Skip to Content

Client Update: Cannabis Act Regulations Revealed

Kevin Landry

Health Canada released the Cannabis Act Regulations (the “Regulations”) at a news conference on June 27, 2018. The Regulations will be published in final form in the July 11, 2018 version of in the Canada Gazette, Part II.

There will be four new sets of regulations in total:

  • Cannabis Regulations;
  • the new Industrial Hemp Regulations;
  • Qualifications for Designation as Analyst Regulations (Cannabis);
  • Cannabis Act (Police Enforcement) Regulations

However, for the purposes of this update we focus solely on the Cannabis Regulations.

On October 17, 2018 cannabis will cease to be governed under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and become governed under the Cannabis Act. Additionally, on that date, both the Access to Cannabis for Medical Purposes Regulations (the “ACMPR”), and the current Industrial Hemp Regulations will be repealed.

The Regulations were initially outlined in the consultation paper titled: Proposed Approach to the Regulation of Cannabis which we discussed in our previous article: Federal Government Desires Feedback on Proposed Cannabis Act Regulations and were amended after feedback was received during the 60-day public consultation launched on November 21, 2017 by Health Canada and republished as a report titled: Proposed Approach to the Regulation of Cannabis: Summary of Comments Received During the Public Consultation summarized in our previous article: Federal Cannabis Act Regulations Taking Shape: Consultation Feedback Revealed.

After the Cannabis Act was approved by Parliament and the Senate after minor amendments, the regulations are the final missing piece to the federal regulatory regime until edibles regulations, which are expected in the year following legalization, are released.

Contents of the Cannabis Regulations

Six classes of licenses

Six classes of license are included in the Regulations, some with sub-classes as set out below. The Regulations also make it clear that license holders can hold multiple licenses subject to some restrictions.

All licenses will require the appointment of key personnel (and optional alternates) such as a “Responsible Person” who can bind the license holder, and all license types except a license for Analytical Testing will have a “Head of Security” (responsible for ensuring security measures are met). Other licenses will have key personnel as described below. As a transitional provision, licensees will have three months from the date the Regulations come into force to appoint persons to these positions.

The Regulations only outline the rights of a license to sell for medical purposes. Adult-use sales are outside the jurisdiction of the Regulations and are the subject of Provincial laws save and except for the sale of medical cannabis.

The Regulations are sparse on the requirements for applications for new licenses under the Regulations, but Health Canada’s website indicates that “Health Canada will launch a new online cannabis tracking and licensing system. It will allow industry to submit and view the progress of applications online. It will also allow industry to submit inventory reports”. There is no timeline for the launch of this service at present.

License Type Permitted Activities Key Personnel Sub Classes
Cultivation May possess or obtain dried cannabis, fresh cannabis, cannabis plants, or seeds by cultivating, propagating or harvesting cannabis.

To sell cannabis to specified license holders or persons authorized to sell under Provincial acts.

Master Grower Micro¹


Standard


Nursery²

Processing May possess or produce (by use of organic solvent, if desired) dried cannabis, oil, fresh cannabis, plants or seeds or accessories that contain cannabis by means other than cultivating, propagating or harvesting it.

To sell cannabis to specified license holders or persons authorized to sell under Provincial acts.

Quality Assurance Person Micro³


Standard

Analytical Testing May possess or obtain cannabis by altering its chemical or physical properties by any means (including the use of organic solvents). Head of Laboratory n/a
Sale May possess and sell cannabis products to the Minister, other specified license holders, or hospital employees. n/a Sale for medical purposes⁴
Research May possess, produce, or transport cannabis for the purpose of research.

May sell plants and seeds specified license holders or the Minister.

n/a n/a
Cannabis Drug License May possess cannabis and produce or sell a drug containing cannabis Senior Person in Charge, Qualified Person in Charge n/a

1. Limited to cultivating up to 200sqm of canopy area
2. Nurseries activities are restricted to cannabis plants or cannabis seeds.
3. Limited to processing up to 600kg of dry cannabis per year, or processing the production from one micro-cultivator operating at the same site.
4. Adult-use sales licenses will fall under provincial laws and in some cases are limited to provincial corporations authorized to sell to adult-use market.

Transition of ACMPR and Narcotics Control Regulations Licenses

Holders of licenses issued under the “former Access to Cannabis for Medical Purposes Regulations“, as the Regulations call it, will be deemed to have licenses under the Regulations as follows:

Former License New License Class Possible Subclass (if conditions of Regs met)
Licence authorizing the production of fresh or dried marihuana, or marihuana plants or seeds Licence for cultivation Licence for standard cultivation

Licence for micro-cultivation

Licence for a nursery

Licence authorizing the production of cannabis oil or cannabis resin Licence for processing Licence for standard processing

Licence for micro-processing

Licence authorizing sale or provision of cannabis to medical practitioners or registered persons Licence for sale Licence for sale for medical purposes

Similarly, licenses issued under the Narcotics Control Regulations will be deemed to be licenses under the Regulations:

Former License New License Class Possible Subclass (if conditions of Regs met)
Licence issued under section 9.2 authorizing the cultivation of marihuana for scientific purposes Licence for research n/a
Licence issued under section 9.2 authorizing the obtaining of extracts from samples of cannabis for the analysis of cannabinoids Licence for analytical testing n/a
Licence issued under section 9.2 authorizing the production, making or assembly of a test kit containing Cannabis Licence for processing Licence for standard processing

Licence for micro-processing

Licence issued under section 9.2 authorizing the production of cannabis for the purpose of conducting testing to determine its chemical characterization Licence for processing Licence for standard processing

Licence for micro-processing

Licence issued under section 9.2 authorizing the possession, sale or distribution of a drug containing Cannabis Cannabis drug licence n/a
Licence issued under section 67 authorizing the cultivation, gathering or production of cannabis for scientific purposes Licence for research n/a

Increased security clearance requirements

Security clearance requirements have been expanded from those in the ACMPR for the new classes of licenses contemplated. These changes fix what was seen as a large hole in the security requirements in that key shareholders of license holders were not previously vetted by Health Canada.

In addition to the license holder (and directors, officers and key personnel, as applicable) being required to pass a security clearance, key shareholders are now required to pass security clearances as well. This includes:

  • any “responsible person”, “head of security”, master grower”, “quality assurance person”, or alternates for these positions;
  • any partners of a partnership that holds a license;
  • any individuals who exercise, or are in a position to exercise, direct control over a corporate, or cooperative license holder. This includes:
    o directors and officers of the individual, if a corporation;
    o partners of the individual, if a partnership; and,
    o directors and officers of the individual if it is a corporate partner in a
    partnership.

As a transitional provision, licensees will have three months from the date the Regulations come into force to provide the Minister with names of additional persons requiring security clearances, and have those persons submit a security clearance application.

Recording of Key Investors

Although Parliament rejected the Senate’s suggestion to create a registry of shareholders of cannabis companies due to “significant operational challenges and privacy concerns” there will still be record-keeping requirements in the Regulations. These will require reporting a variety of metrics relating to Key Investors to the Minister yearly including: a description of the means by which a Key Investor exercises, or is in a position to exercise, control; details of the transaction by virtue of which the Key Investor became such an investor; details about the benefits the Key Investor receives by virtue of their position; and details about instances where money was paid by, or returned to Key Investors.

These records are to be updated and maintained by licensees even after a Key Investor ceases to be such an investor. There are limited exceptions to providing some of this information for Key Investors who invested before the license was issued, before the Regulations came into force (for licenses transferring from the ACMPR or NCR).

Ability to introduce new genetics

The Regulations allow for holders of cultivation licences to obtain and possess cannabis plants and seeds which were not obtained under the ACMPR provided a declaration from the applicant in prescribed form is provided. Currently, Licensed Producers under the ACMPR can only purchase cannabis genetics from other Licensed Producers, which has restricted variation in strains.

Outdoor cultivation

The Regulations provide that “cannabis may be obtained by cultivating, propagating or harvesting it outdoors”. The cannabis produced outdoors would still need to hold up to testing requirements for microbial and chemical contaminants and be secured in accordance with the Regulations.

Any standard cultivation or processing site, including one where growth takes place outdoors, must be designed in a manner that prevents unauthorized access, and which has a perimeter that is visually monitored at all times by recording devices which can detect any attempted or actual unauthorized access to the site.

The grow area- the part of the site where cannabis is cultivated, harvested, or propagated- will need to be surrounded by a physical barrier that prevents unauthorized access and would require monitoring only at the entry and exit points. Similarly, Micro-processors, Micro-cultivators, and nurseries all require physical barriers surrounding the site and any storage areas.

Even more stringent packaging requirements

In addition to the limits laid out in our last update, more restrictions on packaging were introduced:

  • No hidden features designed to change appearance or surface area;
  • Packaging cannot emit or produce scent or sound;
  • Packaging cannot have no cut-out window;
  • Barcodes must be rectangular and contain no image or design;
  • Packaging must not have branding, or images on the interior of the package;
  • Covering of any cannabis container must be transparent and colourless.

 


This update is intended for general information only. If you have questions about the above information, please contact Kevin Landry.

Archive

Lawrence Estate (Part II): How does a mistake affect a contract between heirs?

BY Tipper McEwan

By Tipper McEwan Four children made an agreement shortly after their mother’s death to divide any jointly held asset equally.  What none of them knew at the time was that one…

Read More

Employment law insights from Gbongbor v Multicultural Association of Fredericton

By Clarence Bennett, K.C., ICD.D, Mark Heighton, and Emma-Jean Griffin The recent decision in Gbongbor v Multicultural Association of Fredericton (“Gbongbor”)[1] from the New Brunswick Court of King’s Bench offered…

Read More

Lawrence Estate (Part I): When is a gift a gift?

BY Tipper McEwan

By Tipper McEwan The Nova Scotia Supreme Court recently heard a case that involved a gift from a parent to an adult child in Lawrence Estate v. Lawrence, 2025 NSSC…

Read More

Making 2025 changes real in 2026: A practical guide for employers

BY John Morse & Emma Jean Griffin

By John Morse and Emma Jean Griffin 2025 brought significant changes to Canadian workplace law, with courts and legislators prioritizing fairness, safety, and accountability. Employers now face new obligations around…

Read More

Nova Scotia Court upholds executor’s discretion to refuse an interim distribution from an estate

BY Tipper McEwan

By Tipper McEwan In a first for Nova Scotia, Foster Estate gives guidance on when the Court will, or will not, order an executor to make an interim distribution from…

Read More

Overview of labour and employment implications of the proposed Federal Budget 2025 – the “Canada Strong Budget”

BY Marina Luro & Sophie Poulos

By Marina Luro and Sophie Poulos Introduction The Canadian government has recently tabled their “Canada Strong Budget 2025” (Budget 2025)[1] – an ambitious plan to increase efficiency and cut “wasteful spending”. In large part,…

Read More

Lost in the weeds: Drafting clarity, fire losses, and marijuana exclusion clauses

BY Tipper McEwan

By Tipper McEwan The British Columbia Court of Appeal recently dealt with a marijuana exclusion in Busato v. Gore Mutual Insurance Company, 2025 BCCA 79.  Mr. Busato had a license…

Read More

Proceed with caution: Supreme Court confirms framework for assessing “Material Changes” requiring timely disclosure in Lundin Mining Corp. v Markowich

By Andrew V. Burke, Jason W.J. Woycheshyn, David F. Slipp, and Noah Archibald Take note all public companies – not all operational surprises can be quietly managed. The Supreme Court…

Read More

Building Canada Act – An Act respecting national interest projects

BY Kim Walsh & Michael O'Keefe

By Kim Walsh and Michael O’Keefe Overview The Government of Canada introduced Bill C-5, the One Canadian Economy Act, just over one month after the 2025 federal election. With Bill…

Read More

Concurrent jurisdiction: New Brunswick Court clarifies intersection of labour and human rights disputes

BY Sheila Mecking & John Morse

By Sheila Mecking and John Morse Historically, unions and employees in New Brunswick have sought to enforce an employee’s human rights through both grievance arbitration and by filing complaints with…

Read More

Search Archive