Skip to Content

Impending changes to Nova Scotia’s Workers’ Compensation Act – Gradual onset stress

By Mark Tector and Annie Gray

What’s changing?

Currently, workers’ compensation coverage in Nova Scotia applies to only a narrow subset of psychological injuries.

Specifically, in Nova Scotia – as in all Atlantic Provinces – “stress” will only constitute an “accident” for workers’ compensation purposes when it arises as “an acute reaction to a traumatic event.”

However,  starting from September 1, 2024, Nova Scotia workers’ compensation coverage will extend to gradual onset stress.

What does this mean for employers?

Details

When these changes come into effect, covered workers in Nova Scotia will be entitled to compensation for stress which:

  1. arises out of and in the course of their employment; and
  2. is wholly or predominantly caused by one or more significant work-related stressors or a cumulative series of significant work-related stressors.

While compensation for cumulative workplace stressors marks a significant change, workers will still not be entitled to compensation in respect of stress caused by:

  1. work-related interpersonal conflicts, unless they constitute workplace harassment or bullying; or
  2. labour relations decisions (e.g., changes in working conditions, discipline or termination of employment).

Timing

Changes to Nova Scotia’s Workers’ Compensation Act (“WCA”), together with new Workers’ Compensation Board (“WCB”) policy, will come into effect of September 1, 2024.

Employees whose stress-related claims were finally decided by the WCB (and were either not appealed or had their appeals denied by the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Tribunal (“WCAT”)) prior to September 1, 2024 are not permitted to re-file their claims under the new rules.

However, workers who file stress claims on or after September 1, 2024, will have their claims adjudicated under the new rules, regardless of when the stress at issue first occurred (subject to applicable limitation periods under the WCA).

Additionally, stress claims which remain pending before the WCB as of September 1, 2024 will be decided in accordance with the new rules. Similarly, stress claims pending before WCAT as of September 1, 2024 will be referred back to the WCB to be decided in accordance with the new rules.

Broader Implications

In the face of this increased scope of WCB coverage, employers should review and refresh their respectful workplace policies and training, and consider taking additional steps to foster a psychologically safe workplace.

Additionally, employers faced with claims in other venues which include allegations of stress-related injuries are encouraged to reach out to us as early in the process as possible to assess whether such claims may fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of WCB.

Upcoming webinar

Stewart McKelvey will be hosting a webinar on June 18, 2024 titled “Protecting your Workplace: Gradual Onset Stress “.

Please contact Alicia Gordon, Events Coordinator, at acgordon@stewartmckelvey.com for more information.


This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact the authors, or a member of our Labour & Employment Group.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

Archive

A changing tide: The Ontario Court of Appeal adopts a common-sense approach to interpreting termination clauses and provides much-needed guidance

BY Rick Dunlop & Jennifer Ronalds

By Rick Dunlop and Jennifer Ronalds There has been much uncertainty in recent years with respect to the enforceability of termination clauses in employment contracts. In Baker v. Van Dolder’s…

Read More

Testing the limits: New developments in workplace drug and alcohol testing

BY Killian McParland & Onye Njoku

By Killian McParland and Onye Njoku A recent labour arbitration decision, Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 113 v Toronto Transit Commission, struck down the random drug and alcohol testing program of…

Read More

Deed Transfer Tax not payable on Purchase of Securities – HRM v. Rank Incorporated

BY Robert Grant, K.C. & Sam Ward

Robert Grant, K.C. and Sam Ward In HRM v Rank Incorporated, 2026 NSSC 217, Justice John Keith of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia determined that Deed Transfer Tax was…

Read More

Early court decisions on generative AI: What Canadian businesses need to know

BY Matthew N. Craig

Matthew N. Craig and Sam Schonfeld Regardless of which industry you are a part of, you have likely noticed the adoption of generative artificial intelligence (“GenAI”) all around you. Increasingly,…

Read More

Government of Canada introduces Protecting Privacy and Consumer Data Act

Sarah Dever Letson, CIPP/C, Maria Cummings, and Keeley A. Hussey On June 15, 2026, Bill C-36, An Act to enact the Protecting Privacy and Consumer Data Act, to amend the…

Read More

PEI’s new Employment Standards Act is now in force: What employers need to do now

Murray L. Murphy, K.C., CPHR and Jacob E. Zelman In our earlier update issued in March 2025 (At a glance: Key changes coming to Prince Edward Island’s Employment Standards Act), we flagged…

Read More

More health profession migrations: An update on Nova Scotia’s Regulated Health Professions Act

BY Tyana R. Caplan & Jennifer Taylor

By Tyana Caplan & Jennifer Taylor The midpoint of 2026 provides a timely opportunity to review which health professions in Nova Scotia have now migrated to the Regulated Health Professions…

Read More

A reason to reconsider probate planning in New Brunswick

By Christopher Marr, TEP, Partner with assistance from Brady McKinley, student-at-law Significant increase to New Brunswick probate tax and fees Effective as of June 12, 2026, probate fees and taxes have significantly increased…

Read More

Coverage – Policy Interpretation – Causation

BY Tipper McEwan

By Tipper McEwan In Green Rise Foods Inc. v. N.V. Hagelunie, 2026 ONCA 334 (CanLII),the Court of Appeal for Ontario considered a case involving a series of potential causes for…

Read More

Back to the office? Not without notice: BC Court of Appeal confirms work-from-home can be a binding term of employment

BY Sacha Morisset, K.C.

By Sacha D. Morisset, K.C. The British Columbia Court of Appeal has upheld a finding of constructive dismissal against a Vancouver real estate developer that directed a longtime remote employee…

Read More

Search Archive