Proposed amendments to Cannabis Regulations make it easier to be green
Kevin Landry and Nikolas Shymko
Health Canada has recently proposed a number of amendments to the Cannabis Regulations and other regulations concerning cannabis research and testing, and cannabis beverages. Until April 25, 2022, Health Canada will be accepting comments on the proposed Regulations Amending Certain Regulations Concerning Cannabis Research and Testing and Cannabis Beverages and Order to Amend Schedule 3 published in Canada Gazette, Part I on March 12, 2022.
The proposed amendments are as follows:
(1) Non-therapeutic research on cannabis permitted
Proposed amendments to the Cannabis Exemption (Food and Drugs Act) Regulations would create an exemption from the application of the Food and Drugs Act for certain non-therapeutic research on cannabis.
Non-therapeutic research on cannabis includes research involving the distribution of cannabis to human participants subject to certain exceptions, including: research related to the diagnosis, treatment, mitigation or prevention of a disease, disorder or abnormal physical state or its symptoms.
Non-therapeutic research would exclude any research involving the participation of young persons.
(2) Reference standards and test kits
Currently, only licensed processors are able to sell reference standards and produce test kits, which potentially limits their availability and variety.
Proposed amendments would authorize analytical testers and government laboratories to produce, distribute, and sell reference standards, as well as to produce test kits.
(3) Head of laboratory
Proposed amendments to the Cannabis Regulations would alter the qualifications required for a person to become head of laboratory. It would expand the eligible credentials to include a diploma, certificate or credential from a Canadian post-secondary educational institution in a field or occupation relevant to the duties of the head of laboratory position. It would also expand the recognition of international credentials for this position. The proposed amendments would permit accepting equivalency assessments issued by organizations or institutions designated by Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada or recognized by a province.
(4) Cannabis beverages
The Cannabis Act currently sets a public possession limit of 30 grams of dried cannabis or its “equivalent” for other forms of cannabis as established pursuant to Schedule 3 of the Cannabis Act.
Proposed amendments will create two new classes of cannabis, namely: cannabis beverages and non-solids containing cannabis, other than beverages. This amendment would increase the equivalency for cannabis beverages to 570 grams, as opposed to the current 70 grams. As a result, the amount of cannabis beverages that an adult could possess in public would be equivalent to 48 standard-sized beverage cans (48 × 355 mL cans).
To reduce the impact of these changes on the industry, the proposed regulations would provide a 12-month transition period allowing all licence holders and persons authorized to distribute or sell edible cannabis products to distribute or sell cannabis beverages that have been packaged and labelled in accordance with the current requirements under the Cannabis Act and Cannabis Regulations. Following the transition period, all cannabis beverages distributed and sold by holders of a licence for processing would be required to include a public possession limit statement that is reflective of this proposed amendment, whilst other authorized persons could continue to sell previously labelled and packaged products to sell or distribute their existing inventory of these products.
This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Cannabis group.
Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.
Archive
In May 2016, the Federal Court of Canada confirmed that copyright does not protect facts, even where a book’s author is clearly inspired by the content of a film (Maltz v. Witterick, 2016 FC 524 (CanLII)).…
Read MoreBy Jennifer Taylor “…firms of notaries or lawyers…must not be turned into archives for the tax authorities”1 So says the Supreme Court of Canada in one of two highly anticipated decisions on solicitor-client privilege, offering lawyers…
Read MoreJoe Thorne1 and Clara Linegar2 As joint owners of a business, what do you do when the business relationship falls apart? And what if one owner undermines the business in the process? In Smith v Hillier,3 Justice Paquette…
Read MoreThe Supreme Court of Canada has dismissed the appeals in Bruce Brine v. Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc.1 (with costs) and Luciano Branco, et al. v. Zurich Life Insurance Company Limited, et al.(without costs). Both of…
Read MoreOn May 4, 2016, the Nova Scotia Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act (“PRPP Act”) was proclaimed in force, and finalized Pooled Registered Pension Plan Regulations were released. While there were no major changes from the previously released draft regulations, the proposed rules…
Read MoreBy Level Chan and Dante Manna Pooled Registered Pension Plans (“PRPPs”) are closer to becoming a reality for Nova Scotian employers. PRPPs were established by the Federal government in an effort to address the lack of retirement savings…
Read MoreIn a case where there is a contributorily negligent plaintiff and two or more negligent defendants, can the plaintiff recover 100% of her damages from any of the defendants? The answer in Nova Scotia is…
Read MoreOn Friday, the Province of New Brunswick announced that it would not proceed at this time with the recently proposed changes to binding interest arbitration. The Province announced that a joint labour management committee will be struck to examine…
Read MoreOn March 29, 2016, the Province of New Brunswick tabled proposed changes to the Industrial Relations Act and the Public Services Labour Relations Act. If passed, these changes would dramatically alter well-established principles of private sector collective bargaining.…
Read MoreBy Jennifer Taylor Why is this case a big deal? It started with two salmon. Now, after several years of litigation, the Nova Scotia Provincial Court in R v Martin, 2016 NSPC 14 has stayed proceedings against…
Read More