Impending changes to Nova Scotia’s Workers’ Compensation Act – Gradual onset stress
By Mark Tector and Annie Gray
What’s changing?
Currently, workers’ compensation coverage in Nova Scotia applies to only a narrow subset of psychological injuries.
Specifically, in Nova Scotia – as in all Atlantic Provinces – “stress” will only constitute an “accident” for workers’ compensation purposes when it arises as “an acute reaction to a traumatic event.”
However, starting from September 1, 2024, Nova Scotia workers’ compensation coverage will extend to gradual onset stress.
What does this mean for employers?
Details
When these changes come into effect, covered workers in Nova Scotia will be entitled to compensation for stress which:
- arises out of and in the course of their employment; and
- is wholly or predominantly caused by one or more significant work-related stressors or a cumulative series of significant work-related stressors.
While compensation for cumulative workplace stressors marks a significant change, workers will still not be entitled to compensation in respect of stress caused by:
- work-related interpersonal conflicts, unless they constitute workplace harassment or bullying; or
- labour relations decisions (e.g., changes in working conditions, discipline or termination of employment).
Timing
Changes to Nova Scotia’s Workers’ Compensation Act (“WCA”), together with new Workers’ Compensation Board (“WCB”) policy, will come into effect of September 1, 2024.
Employees whose stress-related claims were finally decided by the WCB (and were either not appealed or had their appeals denied by the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Tribunal (“WCAT”)) prior to September 1, 2024 are not permitted to re-file their claims under the new rules.
However, workers who file stress claims on or after September 1, 2024, will have their claims adjudicated under the new rules, regardless of when the stress at issue first occurred (subject to applicable limitation periods under the WCA).
Additionally, stress claims which remain pending before the WCB as of September 1, 2024 will be decided in accordance with the new rules. Similarly, stress claims pending before WCAT as of September 1, 2024 will be referred back to the WCB to be decided in accordance with the new rules.
Broader Implications
In the face of this increased scope of WCB coverage, employers should review and refresh their respectful workplace policies and training, and consider taking additional steps to foster a psychologically safe workplace.
Additionally, employers faced with claims in other venues which include allegations of stress-related injuries are encouraged to reach out to us as early in the process as possible to assess whether such claims may fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of WCB.
Upcoming webinar
Stewart McKelvey will be hosting a webinar on June 18, 2024 titled “Protecting your Workplace: Gradual Onset Stress “.
Please contact Alicia Gordon, Events Coordinator, at acgordon@stewartmckelvey.com for more information.
This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact the authors, or a member of our Labour & Employment Group.
Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.
Archive
Damages for pain and suffering are capped for Nova Scotians who are injured in motor vehicle accidents if their injuries are considered “minor.” The cap was amended for accidents occurring on or after April 28,…
Read MoreGrant Machum & Sean Kelly A recent decision from the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Ly v. British Columbia (Interior Health Authority) 2017 BCSC 42, provides helpful clarification of the law on termination of probationary employees on the basis…
Read MorePerlene Morrison and Hilary Newman The Supreme Court of Canada recently declined to hear an appeal from the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Campbell v Bruce (County), 2016 ONCA 371. The Court of Appeal confirmed the lower court finding…
Read MoreRick Dunlop In my December 15, 2016 article, Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?, I noted the Report’s1 suggestion that there was a lack of research to reliably determine when individuals are impaired…
Read MoreRick Dunlop and Michelle Black On March 14, 2014, CanMar Contracting Limited (“CanMar”) granted a day off to two of its hard working and longer serving employees so they could spend time with their respective families. That…
Read MoreJoe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The doctrine of unconscionability is an equitable remedy available in exceptional circumstances where a bargain between parties, be it a settlement or a release, may be set aside on the basis that…
Read MoreJonathan Coady After more than five years, the Prince Edward Island Information and Privacy Commissioner (the “Privacy Commissioner”) has completed her review into more than sixty records withheld by a local school board on the…
Read MorePeter McLellan, QC & Richard Jordan Introduction On February 21, 2017 the Nova Scotia Government passed Bill 75 – the Teachers’ Professional Agreement and Classroom Improvement (2017) Act. This Bulletin will provide some background to what is, today,…
Read MoreBruce Grant, QC and Justin Hewitt In the recent decision of Scotia Mortgage Corporation v Furlong1 the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador confirmed that where a law firm acts jointly for the borrower and lender in the placement…
Read MoreThe Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Sabean v Portage La Prairie Mutual Insurance Co, 2017 SCC 7 at the end of January, finally answering an insurance policy question that had divided the lower…
Read More