Historic human rights ruling: Alberta tribunal sets record with landmark damages award, redefining the rules on compensation and deterrence
John A.C. Morse and Lauren Sorel
The Human Rights Tribunal of Alberta (the “Tribunal”) recently awarded three complainants a total of $273,274.91 in compensation, with $155,000.00 of this amount designated as general damages – a new record in Canadian human rights law. This landmark decision not only raises the bar for compensation but also underscores the importance of deterrence against discriminatory actions, particularly those related to sexual and gender-based discrimination.
Case Overview: Oliva, Pascoe, and Strong v. Gursoy, 2024 AHRC 45
This case involved three female employees (Oliva, Pascoe, and Strong) of TJ Construction Management Ltd. (“TJCM”), each of whom left their positions after being subjected to severe sexual harassment and discrimination based on gender and physical disability by their boss, Gursoy.
- Oliva was employed by TJCM for just over one year. She experienced various instances of sexual harassment and gender-based discrimination due to inappropriate comments, touching, and requests from Gursoy. Additionally, the Tribunal found that Gursoy engaged in discrimination based on physical disability by demanding details of a medical diagnosis that were irrelevant to Olivia’s employment.
- Pascoe worked with TJCM for approximately one month. Her complaint mirrored Oliva’s, involving inappropriate sexual comments, advances, and touching by Gursoy.
- Strong, the third employee, worked for TJCM for approximately eight months. She was also subjected to inappropriate touching and suggestions by Gursoy and faced additional mistreatment, including being berated and demoted due to her pregnancy.
Each of the complaints was upheld despite being untested by the Respondent and based solely on documentary evidence and hearing submissions, as Gursoy was removed from the proceedings for his “refusal to treat the complaints with civility and respect.”
While the general damages were distributed among the complainants, the $75,000.00 awarded to Oliva is the highest individual award of general damages in the human rights context. The substantial award in this case was supported by the finding that Gursoy’s conduct was “deserving of denunciation” and had severe impacts on each complainant, particularly Oliva, who suffered from depression as a result of her employment with TJCM.
In a separate decision, the Tribunal awarded significant costs related to these proceedings, granting each complainant $10,000 despite no evidence of substantial legal fees incurred. The Tribunal deemed a costs award appropriate due to Gursoy’s “constantly egregious behaviour.”
Implications
This decision signifies a shift toward using general damages not only for compensation but also as a punitive measure to deter serious discriminatory behaviour. Employers must now be more vigilant in preventing and addressing such misconduct to avoid substantial penalties. Proactive measures include maintaining a safe work environment, implementing clear anti-discrimination policies, conducting fair investigations, and seeking legal advice early.
This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Labour and Employment Group.
Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.
Archive
DUE DILIGENCE Generally, occupational health and safety legislation in Atlantic Canada, like other jurisdictions, requires employers to take reasonable precautions to ensure the health and safety of workers in their workplace. Read More INCIDENT RESPONSE…
Read MoreThe Cyber-safety Act (“the Act”), excepting Part V (that part amending the Safer Communities and Neighbourhoods Act), was proclaimed August 6, 2013 and is now in effect. As discussed in our May 17, 2013 Client Update and our HRLaw blog The business case…
Read MoreThe Supreme Court of Canada has now released the much anticipated decision in the case of Marine Services International Ltd. v Ryan Estate, 2013 SCC 44. In doing so, the high court has signaled, at least…
Read MoreIn Wood v. Wood et al, 2013 PESC 11, a motion pursuant to Rule 7.08 of the Rules of Civil Procedure for court approval of a settlement involving a minor, Mr. Justice John K. Mitchell approved the settlement among the…
Read MoreClients who sit on boards of corporate employers should take note of recent amendments made to New Brunswick’s Employment Standards Act (the “ESA”) which could increase their exposure to personal liability in connection with claims advanced by…
Read MoreSignificant changes may be coming to the standard automobile policy in PEI, including increases to the accident benefits available under Section B and an increase to the so-called “cap” applicable to claims for minor personal…
Read MoreOn June 17, 2013, pursuant to the recently amended Section 70 of the Labour Relations Act for Newfoundland and Labrador (“NL”), the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador issued three Special Project Orders (“SPOs”) in respect of the…
Read MoreOn June 14, 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada (“the Court”) released the decision that employers across the country were waiting for. In CEP Local 30 v. Irving Pulp & Paper Ltd., 2013 SCC 34, a…
Read MoreThe Government of Newfoundland and Labrador (“NL”) has recently released its “Aboriginal Consultation Policy on Land and Resource Development Decisions” (the “Policy”). A copy of the Policy can be accessed here. This new Policy is the…
Read MoreThe following is a province-by-province update of legislation from a busy 2013 spring session in Atlantic Canada. Watching these developments, we know the new legislation that has passed or could soon pass, will impact our…
Read More