2024 New Brunswick election: employer obligations
By John Morse
The New Brunswick provincial election is set to take place on Monday, October 21, 2024, with polling hours between 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.
Under the New Brunswick Elections Act, all employees who are eligible voters (i.e., Canadian citizens aged 18 and older) are entitled to three consecutive hours off work during polling hours to ensure they can cast their vote.
Employers are only required to provide employees time off if the employees’ work schedule does not provide the employee with 3 consecutive hours to vote.
For example, an employee working from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. will have three consecutive hours to vote after work (5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.), and is not entitled to time off to vote. However, an employee working from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. will only have one hour available (7:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.) to vote, and must be provided additional paid time off to provide the employee with at least three consecutive hours to vote.
Employers have the discretion to determine when the three consecutive hours will be granted. Possible options include:
(a) Allowing employees to leave work at 5:00 p.m. to provide three hours (5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.);
(b) Allowing employees to start work later, such as at 1:00pm, enabling them to vote from 10:00 a.m. to 1:00pm; or
(c) Offering three consecutive hours off at any point during the workday while the polls are open.
Employers are prohibited from interfering with an employee’s right to vote. This includes preventing access to the time off for voting, intimidation, or any other form of coercion. Employers are also prohibited from deducting pay or imposing penalties on employees for the time taken off to vote.
This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact the authors, or a member of our Labour & Employment Group.
Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.
Archive
IN THIS ISSUE: Putting Trust in your Estate Planning, by Paul Coxworthy and Michael McGonnell The Risks, for Insurers in Entering Administration Services Only (ASO) Contracts, by Tyana Caplan Angels in Atlantic Canada, by Allison McCarthy, Gavin Stuttard and Adam Bata…
Read MoreBill 31, An Act Respecting Human Rights, came into force on June 24, 2010 replacing the Human Rights Code (the “Code”). For more information, please download a copy of this client update.
Read MoreIN THIS ISSUE Expanded Fines and Penalties for Environmental Offences: The New Federal Environmental Enforcement Act Spam about to be Canned? Preparing a Business for Sale Business Disputes Corner – Place of Arbitration and Selected…
Read MoreThe Nova Scotia Court of Appeal has unanimously upheld the province’s legislative limits on general damage recovery for “minor injuries”. Today’s decision, authored by Chief Justice Michael MacDonald, completely affirms the January 2009 decision of…
Read MoreThe Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) announced helpful administrative positions concerning the new rules under the Fifth Protocol to the Canada-US Income Tax Convention, 1980 which will come into effect on January 1, 2010. The CRA…
Read MoreIN THIS ISSUE Contractor Held Liable for Business Interruption: Heyes v. City of Vancouver, 2009 BCSC 651 When Can a Tendering Authority Walk Away if Bids are Too High? Crown Paving Ltd. v. Newfoundland &…
Read MoreWithholding tax and other issues under the Fifth Protocol The Fifth Protocol to the Canada-US Tax Convention, 1980 introduced significant changes which may affect the use of most unlimited companies and other so-called ULCs. These…
Read MoreIN THIS ISSUE An Eye for an Eye: Alberta Court of Appeal Upholds Finding of Retaliation Liability as a Result of Generosity in Quebec Undue Hardship Established in Scent Case Parents of Twins Get Double…
Read More- « Previous
- 1
- …
- 62
- 63
- 64