Skip to content

The Winds of Change (Part 7): Paying the Piper: New Newfoundland and Labrador Fiscal Framework expects billions in revenues from wind to hydrogen projects

By Dave Randell, G. John Samms, and Stuart Wallace

With the deadline for bids on crown lands available for wind energy projects extended to noon on March 23rd, the latest development in our Winds of Change series looks at the recently announced fiscal framework of Wind-Hydrogen projects in Newfoundland & Labrador

On February 23, 2023, the Newfoundland and Labrador Department of Industry, Energy and Technology announced further information on the fiscal framework of Wind-Hydrogen projects. This article sets out to provide a basic outline the specifics of the framework.

Principles

Predictability and transparency are the intended principles on which the fiscal framework has been developed. This is intended allow investors to make informed decisions. The framework attempts to balance the risk of investment with the use of provincial resources.

Payment Components

For a singular project over a 30-year period, the government of Newfoundland and Labrador expects $3.5B in taxes, royalties and fees.[1]

Payments will occur early in the project, and throughout the operation phase. These payments can be broken into three components: Land, Wind, and Water.

Land

  • Crown Land Reserve Fee: Annual charge of 3.5% of the market value of reserved lands. Payments begin upon award of exclusive right to pursue projects on lands.
  • Crown Land Lease Fee: Annual charge of 7% of market value of land. Payments begin upon issuance of Crown Land lease.

Wind

  • Wind Electricity Tax: Annual charge of $4,000 per megawatt on installed capacity. Payments begin when the turbines are “in-service”, and applicable to all wind-hydrogen projects (≥ 5 megawatts) producing electricity for the purposes of producing hydrogen.

Water

  • Water Use Fee: Annual charge of $500 per 1000m3 of water licensed and used, and $50 per 1000m3 of water licensed but not used. Payments begin when permit is issued, and are applicable to all hydrogen facilities.
  • Water Royalty: Payable based on the calculated residual value of the water. Rates are tiered and linked to cost recovery. These terms can be modified via agreements with the Province. Further details about calculation in document.
    • Tier 1: Rate of 10% applied after 1x cost recovery.
    • Tier 2: Rate of 20% applied after 2x cost recovery.
    • Tier 3: Rate of 25% applied after 3x cost recovery.

Taxes

Taxes will be applicable to all wind projects producing electricity for the purposes of producing hydrogen. For more information on how Atlantic Canada is poised to benefit from clean energy tax credits, check out part 5 of this series.

Bids

Deadline for submitting bids has been extended to March 23, 2023.

Successful Bidders will be awarded the exclusive right to pursue their project through the Crown Lands and Environmental Assessment processes.


This update is intended for general information only. If you have any questions on the above we would invite you to contact the authors or any other member of our Energy Group.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.


[1] Using a base case of a 1000 MW Windfarm and a 500 MW Hydrogen (Ammonia) Facility with capital costs of $3.5 billion with an annual production of 60k tonnes of hydrogen converted to 344k tonnes of ammonia.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Prince Edward Island adopts new Municipal Government Act

December 22, 2016

Perlene Morrison Prince Edward Island’s municipal legislation is being modernized with the implementation of the Municipal Government Act (the “MGA”). The legislation has now received royal assent and will be proclaimed in force at a future date.…

Read More

Land Use Planning in Prince Edward Island: The Year in Review

December 20, 2016

Jonathan Coady and Chera-Lee Gomez It’s that time of year – the moment when we look back at the year that was and chart our course for the year ahead. For many councillors, administrators and planning professionals…

Read More

The Latest in Labour Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Onsite OHS liability: Who is (and who is not) the true constructor?

December 15, 2016

Peter McLellan, QC and Michelle Black In a recent decision, R v McCarthy’s Roofing Limited, Judge Anne Derrick provided some much-needed clarity around what it means to be a “constructor” on a job site. This is critical as…

Read More

Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?

December 15, 2016

Rick Dunlop On December 13, 2016, the Government of Canada released A Framework for the Legalization and Regulation of Cannabis in Canada: The Final Report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation (“Report”). The Report’s…

Read More

Canadian employers facing marijuana challenges in the workplace

November 25, 2016

Brian Johnston, QC Canadian employers are already coping with approximately 75,000 Canadians authorized to use medical marijuana. Health Canada expects that this number will increase to about 450,000 by 2024. Employers know that medical marijuana…

Read More

You’ve got mail – Ontario Court of Appeal sends a constitutional message to municipalities about community mailboxes

October 28, 2016

Jonathan Coady With its decision in Canada Post Corporation v. City of Hamilton,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal has confirmed that the placement of community mailboxes by Canada Post is a matter beyond the reach of municipalities…

Read More

A window on interpreting insurance contracts: Top 10 points from Ledcor Construction

September 23, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Thanks to some dirty windows, insurance lawyers have a new go-to Supreme Court case on issues of policy interpretation: Ledcor Construction Ltd v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co, 2016 SCC 37. The insurers in Ledcor Construction had…

Read More

Charter-ing a Different Course? Two decisions on TWU’s proposed law school

August 11, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…

Read More

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40

August 11, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…

Read More

Client Update: SCC issues major decision affecting federal employers: Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited

July 15, 2016

On July 14, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a significant decision affecting federally regulated employers across Canada. In Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited the Court held that the purpose of the unjust dismissal…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top