Skip to content

The Winds of Change (Part 7): Paying the Piper: New Newfoundland and Labrador Fiscal Framework expects billions in revenues from wind to hydrogen projects

By Dave Randell, G. John Samms, and Stuart Wallace

With the deadline for bids on crown lands available for wind energy projects extended to noon on March 23rd, the latest development in our Winds of Change series looks at the recently announced fiscal framework of Wind-Hydrogen projects in Newfoundland & Labrador

On February 23, 2023, the Newfoundland and Labrador Department of Industry, Energy and Technology announced further information on the fiscal framework of Wind-Hydrogen projects. This article sets out to provide a basic outline the specifics of the framework.

Principles

Predictability and transparency are the intended principles on which the fiscal framework has been developed. This is intended allow investors to make informed decisions. The framework attempts to balance the risk of investment with the use of provincial resources.

Payment Components

For a singular project over a 30-year period, the government of Newfoundland and Labrador expects $3.5B in taxes, royalties and fees.[1]

Payments will occur early in the project, and throughout the operation phase. These payments can be broken into three components: Land, Wind, and Water.

Land

  • Crown Land Reserve Fee: Annual charge of 3.5% of the market value of reserved lands. Payments begin upon award of exclusive right to pursue projects on lands.
  • Crown Land Lease Fee: Annual charge of 7% of market value of land. Payments begin upon issuance of Crown Land lease.

Wind

  • Wind Electricity Tax: Annual charge of $4,000 per megawatt on installed capacity. Payments begin when the turbines are “in-service”, and applicable to all wind-hydrogen projects (≥ 5 megawatts) producing electricity for the purposes of producing hydrogen.

Water

  • Water Use Fee: Annual charge of $500 per 1000m3 of water licensed and used, and $50 per 1000m3 of water licensed but not used. Payments begin when permit is issued, and are applicable to all hydrogen facilities.
  • Water Royalty: Payable based on the calculated residual value of the water. Rates are tiered and linked to cost recovery. These terms can be modified via agreements with the Province. Further details about calculation in document.
    • Tier 1: Rate of 10% applied after 1x cost recovery.
    • Tier 2: Rate of 20% applied after 2x cost recovery.
    • Tier 3: Rate of 25% applied after 3x cost recovery.

Taxes

Taxes will be applicable to all wind projects producing electricity for the purposes of producing hydrogen. For more information on how Atlantic Canada is poised to benefit from clean energy tax credits, check out part 5 of this series.

Bids

Deadline for submitting bids has been extended to March 23, 2023.

Successful Bidders will be awarded the exclusive right to pursue their project through the Crown Lands and Environmental Assessment processes.


This update is intended for general information only. If you have any questions on the above we would invite you to contact the authors or any other member of our Energy Group.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.


[1] Using a base case of a 1000 MW Windfarm and a 500 MW Hydrogen (Ammonia) Facility with capital costs of $3.5 billion with an annual production of 60k tonnes of hydrogen converted to 344k tonnes of ammonia.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Let’s talk about batteries: Nova Scotia Power’s latest development in renewable energy

July 18, 2024

In conjunction with our upcoming sponsorship of the Halifax Chamber of Commerce luncheon, featuring the Minister of Energy and Natural Resources the Hon. Jonathan Wilkinson, we are pleased to present a Thought Leadership article highlighting…

Read More

“Sale” away: The SCC’s more flexible approach to exclusion clauses in contracts for the sale of goods

July 9, 2024

By Jennifer Taylor & Marina Luro A recent Supreme Court of Canada decision has clarified how to interpret exclusion clauses in sale of goods contracts. The Court in Earthco Soil Mixtures Inc. v Pine Valley…

Read More

Recent case re-confirms temporary ailment is not a disability

June 24, 2024

By Mark Tector and Tiegan A. Scott Decision On April 3, 2024, the Alberta Court of King’s Bench (“ABKB”) upheld a decision of the Chief of the Commissions and Tribunals (the “CCT Decision”), which held…

Read More

Compensation for expropriation: Fair, but not more than fair

June 17, 2024

By Erin Best, Stephen Penney, Robert Bradley, Megan Kieley1 and Elizabeth Fleet1 Expropriation is a live issue in Canadian courts. The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision to broaden the test for constructive expropriation in Annapolis…

Read More

Changes affecting federally regulated employers

June 10, 2024

By Killian McParland and Sophie Poulos There have been many changes in recent months affecting employers governed by federal labour and employment laws. In September 2024, Stewart McKelvey will be hosting a webinar to review…

Read More

Impending changes to Nova Scotia’s Workers’ Compensation Act – Gradual onset stress

June 4, 2024

By Mark Tector and Annie Gray What’s changing? Currently, workers’ compensation coverage in Nova Scotia applies to only a narrow subset of psychological injuries. Specifically, in Nova Scotia – as in all Atlantic Provinces –…

Read More

Appeal Courts uphold substantial costs awards for regulators

May 22, 2024

By Sean Kelly & Michiko Gartshore Professional regulators can incur substantial costs through discipline processes. These costs are often associated with investigations, hearings as well as committee member expenses and are an unfortunate by-product of…

Read More

Less than two weeks to go … Canada Supply Chain Transparency Reports are due May 31st

May 21, 2024

By Christine Pound, ICD.D., Twila Reid, ICD.D., Sarah Dever Letson, CIPP/C, Sheila Mecking, Hilary Newman, and Daniel Roth Introduction The first reports under the Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act (the…

Read More

Court upheld municipality’s refusal to disclose investigation report

May 1, 2024

By Sheila Mecking and Sarah Dever Letson A recent decision out of the Court of King’s Bench of New Brunswick,[1] upheld the Municipality of Tantramar’s decision to withhold a Workplace Assessment Report under section 20(1)…

Read More

Occupational Health and Safety sentencing decision – Nova Scotia

April 29, 2024

By Sean Kelly & Tiegan Scott Earlier this month, the Provincial Court of Nova Scotia issued its sentencing decision in R v The Brick Warehouse LP, 2024 NSPC 26, imposing a monetary penalty of $143,750 (i.e.,…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top