The Winds of Change (Part 7): Paying the Piper: New Newfoundland and Labrador Fiscal Framework expects billions in revenues from wind to hydrogen projects
By Dave Randell, G. John Samms, and Stuart Wallace
With the deadline for bids on crown lands available for wind energy projects extended to noon on March 23rd, the latest development in our Winds of Change series looks at the recently announced fiscal framework of Wind-Hydrogen projects in Newfoundland & Labrador
On February 23, 2023, the Newfoundland and Labrador Department of Industry, Energy and Technology announced further information on the fiscal framework of Wind-Hydrogen projects. This article sets out to provide a basic outline the specifics of the framework.
Principles
Predictability and transparency are the intended principles on which the fiscal framework has been developed. This is intended allow investors to make informed decisions. The framework attempts to balance the risk of investment with the use of provincial resources.
Payment Components
For a singular project over a 30-year period, the government of Newfoundland and Labrador expects $3.5B in taxes, royalties and fees.[1]
Payments will occur early in the project, and throughout the operation phase. These payments can be broken into three components: Land, Wind, and Water.
Land
- Crown Land Reserve Fee: Annual charge of 3.5% of the market value of reserved lands. Payments begin upon award of exclusive right to pursue projects on lands.
- Crown Land Lease Fee: Annual charge of 7% of market value of land. Payments begin upon issuance of Crown Land lease.
Wind
- Wind Electricity Tax: Annual charge of $4,000 per megawatt on installed capacity. Payments begin when the turbines are “in-service”, and applicable to all wind-hydrogen projects (≥ 5 megawatts) producing electricity for the purposes of producing hydrogen.
Water
- Water Use Fee: Annual charge of $500 per 1000m3 of water licensed and used, and $50 per 1000m3 of water licensed but not used. Payments begin when permit is issued, and are applicable to all hydrogen facilities.
- Water Royalty: Payable based on the calculated residual value of the water. Rates are tiered and linked to cost recovery. These terms can be modified via agreements with the Province. Further details about calculation in document.
- Tier 1: Rate of 10% applied after 1x cost recovery.
- Tier 2: Rate of 20% applied after 2x cost recovery.
- Tier 3: Rate of 25% applied after 3x cost recovery.
Taxes
Taxes will be applicable to all wind projects producing electricity for the purposes of producing hydrogen. For more information on how Atlantic Canada is poised to benefit from clean energy tax credits, check out part 5 of this series.
Bids
Deadline for submitting bids has been extended to March 23, 2023.
Successful Bidders will be awarded the exclusive right to pursue their project through the Crown Lands and Environmental Assessment processes.
This update is intended for general information only. If you have any questions on the above we would invite you to contact the authors or any other member of our Energy Group.
Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.
[1] Using a base case of a 1000 MW Windfarm and a 500 MW Hydrogen (Ammonia) Facility with capital costs of $3.5 billion with an annual production of 60k tonnes of hydrogen converted to 344k tonnes of ammonia.
Archive
Vasu Sivapalan and Meg Collins On May 5, 2017, An Act Respecting the Opening of Sealed Adoption Records (“Act”) received royal assent, leading to significant changes for birth parents and adoptees across the province. As…
Read MoreJennifer Taylor Recent amendments to the Nova Scotia Insurance Act are designed “to protect the financial interests of an innocent person when the person’s property is damaged by another person with whom that person shares…
Read MoreBrian G. Johnston, QC Cannabis legalization is coming. The legislation is expected to pass by July with legalization becoming effective by September. Employers should take notice because: 1. There is already a lot of cannabis…
Read MoreJanet Clark and Sean Seviour A recent decision from the Supreme Court of Canada clarifies determination of what is “reasonably foreseeable”: Rankin (Rankin’s Garage & Sales) v J.J., 2018 SCC 19. The case involved two…
Read MoreJennifer Taylor & Michelle Chai A recent Supreme Court decision tackled two issues that have proven complex in Nova Scotia law: summary judgment and limitation periods. The Plaintiff in Cameron v Nova Scotia Association of…
Read MoreBrian G. Johnston, QC The Arbitrator in Lower Churchill Transmission Construction Employers’ Association and IBEW, Local 1620 dismissed a grievance on April 30, 2018 concluding: The Employer did not place the Grievor in employment at…
Read MoreRick Dunlop and Richard Jordan Employers, and benefit providers on their behalf, make policy decisions as to what drugs or benefits (including monetary limits) will be covered by benefit plans. The Board of Trustees in…
Read MoreErin Best The decision of Justice Handrigan in Ryan v. Curlew is the first motor vehicle accident personal injury decision to come out of the Newfoundland and Labrador courts in quite some time. The case…
Read MoreRob Aske The arrival of spring should bring thoughts of renewal… to your privacy practices. Breach reporting under PIPEDA Canada’s federal privacy law known by the acronym PIPEDA (Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act)…
Read MoreChad Sullivan Overview An Indigenous law professor filed a human rights complaint against the University of British Columbia claiming the university discriminated against her in failing to consider her less traditional scholarly work as akin…
Read More