Skip to content

Retail Payments Activities Regulations released and open for comment

By Kevin Landry and Colton Smith

The Retail Payment Activities Regulations have been released in the Canada Gazette Part 1 for comment. Interested persons may make representations concerning the proposed regulations for a period of 45 days.

The regulations provide further detail about the governance structure being imposed by the Retail Payments Activities Act, which we have previously written about here and here.

The Retail Payments Activities Act was enacted by the federal government in June 2021 with the objective of regulating retail payment providers in Canada.

What Will the Retail Payments Activities Regulations Do?

Certain Parties Excluded

The proposed Retail Payment Activities Regulations provide further specifics on parties who are excluded from the application of the Retail Payments Activities Act.

Regarding securities transactions, the Retail Payments Activities Act states that electronic funds transfers are excluded from the Act if they are made “for the purpose of giving effect to a prescribed transaction in relation to securities”. The Retail Payment Activities Regulations elaborate on this exemption, defining these prescribed transactions as those that are performed by an individual or entity under Canadian securities legislation. These transactions are excluded as they are not for the purpose of retail payments and are already captured by provincial securities regulators.

The Retail Payment Activities Regulations also exclude the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication global messaging network (SWIFT) from the application of the Retail Payments Activities Act, as it is already subject to supervision by major central banks (including the Bank of Canada).

Finally, the Retail Payment Activities Regulations will further exclude retail payment activities that are performed as a service or business activity which is incidental to other services or business activities that are not a payment function.

Safeguarding of End User Funds

The proposed Retail Payment Activities Regulations also provides clarity on the steps payment service providers are to take to safeguard end-user funds. These regulations are intended to protect the funds of consumers and businesses from financial loss in the event that a payment service provider becomes insolvent. To achieve this objective, the Retail Payment Activities Regulations requires that payment service providers must either:

  • hold funds in trust in a trust account; or
  • hold funds in a segregated account while also holding insurance or a guarantee with respect to the funds.

The Retail Payment Activities Regulations would also require that accounts that are used to hold end-user funds must be held at regulated financial institutions, such as banks, provincial credit unions, or foreign financial institutions. Additionally, if payment service providers choose to insure or guarantee end-user funds, the insurance or guarantee must also be from a regulated financial institution that is not an affiliate of the payment service provider. Furthermore, any insurance or guarantee proceeds are required to be payable to end user as soon as possible following insolvency, and must not form a part of the general estate of the payment service provider.

Under the Retail Payment Activities Regulations, payment service providers will also have to implement a “Fund Safeguarding Framework” that will ensure that funds make their way to end users without delay upon bankruptcy. This written framework must describe the “systems, policies, processes, procedures, controls and other means” to meet the objective of safe-guarding end user funds. This will require payment service providers to make use of liquidity arrangements to hold end-user funds in secure and liquid assets, as well as keeping accurate records of end users as well as the amount of funds currently held.

Safeguarding measures taken by payment service providers will be reviewed annually, and biennially by independent parties. Payment service providers will also be required to evaluate if end-user funds were not properly safeguarded in the year prior, and to implement steps to prevent these circumstances from occurring.

Registration

Under the Retail Payment Activities Regulations, applicants will be required to pay a one-time registration fee of $2,500 (to be adjusted for inflation). This does not include the separate annual assessment fee to be paid by payment service providers. The Retail Payment Activities Regulations also provides further details on the information that is required to be included within an application under the Retail Payment Activities Act.

The Bank of Canada will maintain a registry of all registered payment service providers, and may refuse or revoke applications if a payment service provider is behind on assessment fees, or if the Retail Payment Activities Act no longer applies to the payment service provider. Under the Retail Payment Activities Regulations, the registry will contain information regarding the registration status of the payment service provider, their business contact information, and the payment functions they perform.

Additionally, new applications will be required to be filed if an individual or entity wishes to acquire control of a payment service provider. Control is defined within the Retail Payment Activities Regulations and would include acquiring direct or indirectly more than one-third of the votes that may be cast to elect the directors of the payment service provider or acquiring control of an entity that controls the payment service provider.

Reporting

Under the Retail Payments Activities Act, payment service providers must establish, implement and maintain an operational risk management and incident response framework and implement certain measures to safeguard end-user funds, if applicable.

The Bank of Canada is tasked with monitoring and assessing registered payment service providers performance of the above noted obligations. To do so, payment service providers will be required to submit three kinds of reports:

  • Annual reports will be required to contain a risk management framework that includes a description of operational risks and the human and financial resources used to implement the framework. Annual reports will also be required to contain a description of their fund safeguarding framework, which must include a description of the methods used to safeguard funds, a description of the Fund Safeguarding Framework, information on account providers, and independent reviews that were conducted in the year prior. Finally, the annual report will be required to include information on the total value of end-user funds held, the volume and value of electronic fund transfers related to the performance of a retail payment activity, the number of end users, and the number of payment service providers that services are provided to.
  • Significant change reports require notices to be filed at least 5 days prior to making a significant change. Additionally, the contents of the report will be required to include information regarding the reason for the change, and the payment service providers evaluation of the changes effect on operational risks or fund safeguarding, as well as any new policies introduced due to the change.
  • Incident reports, which contain a description of incidents that have a “Material Impact” on end users, payment service providers, and certain financial market infrastructure. These reports will outline the incidents and its impact on individuals/entities affected, as well as the actions taken by the payment service provider to respond to the incident.

The Bank of Canada will use these reports, along with responses to requests submitted to payment service providers, to assess a payment service providers compliance. Assessment may include desk reviews, on-site visits, or a special audit.

Finally, the Retail Payment Activities Regulations would provide for a standard period of 15 days to respond to information requests from the Bank of Canada, unless they are related to ongoing events that may have a significant adverse impact, in which case the response time would be required within 24 hours.

Penalties and Enforcement

The proposed Retail Payment Activities Regulations establish a wide-ranging set of penalties for serious to very serious violations of the Retail Payment Activities Act. These include penalties of up to $1,000,000 per violation for “serious violations” and up to $10,000,000 per violation for “very serious” violations. Enforcement will be up to the Bank of Canada. Further information on enforcement, as well as the Bank of Canada’s supervisory role under the Retail Payment Activities Regulations can be found here.


This update is intended for general information only. If you have questions about the above, please contact the author(s) to discuss your needs for specific legal advice relating to the particular circumstances of your situation.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Nova Scotia unveils changes to financial hardship unlocking – financial institutions to receive applications starting July 1, 2021

June 11, 2021

Dante Manna with the assistance of Kali Robertson (summer student) The Nova Scotia Government recently released regulations reassigning the authority for administering financial hardship unlocking in the province. Effective July 1, 2021, individuals will apply directly…

Read More

Reuniting with family: who can come to Canada despite COVID-19 restrictions?

June 10, 2021

Brittany Trafford The Canadian borders have been restricted for over a year now and many families have struggled with being separated. Throughout 2020 and early 2021 restrictions have fluctuated as the federal government tried to…

Read More

Unifor Local 64 v Corner Brook Pulp and Paper Limited: citing statutory duty to provide safe workplace as justification to demand drug test

June 7, 2021

Harold Smith, QC with the assistance of Matthew Raske (summer student) A recent labour arbitration decision, Unifor Local 64 and Corner Brook Pulp and Paper Limited, shows how the permissibility of drug and alcohol testing continues…

Read More

Planning for re-opening: what might an international border opening look like in Canada?

June 2, 2021

Brittany Trafford Last week the Maritime provinces announced various re-opening plans based on vaccine trajectories, with Newfoundland and Labrador making an announcement today¹. These plans address, among other things, who will be able to enter…

Read More

COVID-19 immigration update

May 31, 2021

*Last updated: May 31, 2021 (Originally published April 1, 2020) Kathleen Leighton Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there are various implications for the immigration world, including for those already in Canada, as well as those…

Read More

Nova Scotia unveils reopening plan

May 28, 2021

Katharine Mack Premier Ian Rankin and Chief Medical Officer of Health Dr. Robert Strang provided details on Nova Scotia’s reopening plan this afternoon. The Province’s plan has a total of 5 phases. Phase 1, which focuses…

Read More

Khan v. CBC – the expanding role of privacy law in labour arbitrations

May 27, 2021

Chad Sullivan A recent labour arbitration decision (Canadian Broadcasting Corp. and Canadian Media Guild (Khan), Re, 2021 CanLII 761) provides another example of how privacy law continues to evolve and can directly impact the outcome…

Read More

The Retail Payment Activities Act: the federal government’s proposed regulation of retail payments for FinTech

May 27, 2021

Kevin Landry and Annelise Harnanan (summer student) In April 2021, the federal government introduced the draft Retail Payments Activities Act (“RPAA”) as part of Bill C-30, the Act to implement the 2021 federal budget. Under…

Read More

New Brunswick regulator seeks input on revised proposed rule under Unclaimed Property Act

May 25, 2021

Christopher Marr, TEP and Level Chan with the assistance of Annelise Harnanan (summer student) On May 20, 2021, the New Brunswick Financial and Consumer Services Commission (“FCNB”) released a revised version of one of its…

Read More

Nova Scotia Court of Appeal unwilling to affirm Charter right to testamentary freedom

May 21, 2021

Jennifer Taylor and Bhreagh Ross   The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal has overturned a decision that found a Charter right to testamentary freedom. Nova Scotia (Attorney General) v Lawen Estate¹ involved an appeal by…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top