Skip to content

Pay Transparency: Recent Changes to PEI’s Employment Standards Act

Murray Murphy and Kate Profit

Changes to Prince Edward Island’s Employment Standards Act (“ESA”) regarding pay transparency received royal assent on November 17, 2021 and has recently come into force as of June 1, 2022.

 

Pay History

 

Under these amendments, employers are prevented from seeking pay history information from applicants, whether directly or indirectly. This does not prevent an applicant from voluntarily disclosing their pay history information without prompting from the employer. When such information is provided by an applicant, an employer is entitled to rely on such information when determining pay for the applicant.

 

Employers are still able to seek information about pay ranges or aggregate pay provided for comparable positions for which the applicant is applying.

 

Pay Range Information

 

Employer’s who publicly advertise a job to the general public must include information about the expected pay or pay range for the posted position. “Publicly advertised job positing” is defined as:

 

an external job posting for a specific job that an employer advertises to the general public in any manner, but for greater certainty does not include recruitment campaigns, general help wanted signs or positions that are only advertised to existing employees of the employer

 

Anti-Reprisal

 

The amendments provide safeguards to allow employees to seek information from the employer and share pay information in the workplace without fear of reprisal. Specifically, employers are prevented from intimidating, dismissing, or otherwise penalizing an employee (or threatening to do so) when an employee:

 

  • Makes inquiries about pay or requests information on the employer’s pay policies;
  • Discloses pay information to another employee;
  • Provides information regarding the employer’s compliance or non-compliance; or
  • Asks the employer to comply with pay history, pay transparency, or anti-reprisal provisions.

 

Application

 

These changes will apply to all non-unionized workplaces. However, some changes will not apply to those governed by a collective agreement.

 

Subsection 2(4) of the ESA sets out that only certain provisions of the ESA are applicable to employees whose terms and conditions are established by a collective agreement pursuant to the Labour Act R.S.P.E.I. 1988, Cap. L-1.

 

Pay transparency provisions span sections 5.8 (pay history), 5.9 (pay range information), and 5.10 (anti-reprisal) of the ESA, however, it is only section 5.10 that will apply to unionized workplaces.

 

Key Takeaways

 

Pay transparency amendments will likely result in changes to employer’s hiring practices, including what questions they ask and what information is offered to the applicant. Namely, these changes will require many employers to share pay information (being either expected pay or a pay range) when jobs are posted publicly.

 


This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Labour and Employment group.

 

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: “Lien”-ing Towards Efficiency: Upcoming Amendments to the Builders’ Lien Act

June 29, 2017

By Brian Tabor, QC and Colin Piercey Bill 81 and Bill 15, receiving Royal Assent in 2013 and 2014 respectively, are due to take effect this month. On June 30, 2017, amendments to the Builders’…

Read More

Weeding Through New Brunswick’s Latest Cannabis Recommendations

June 26, 2017

New Brunswick continues to be a thought leader in the field of regulation of recreational cannabis and provides us with a first look at what the provincial regulation of recreational cannabis might look like. New…

Read More

Client Update: Elk Valley Decision – SCC Finds that Enforcement of “No Free Accident” Rule in Workplace Drug and Alcohol Policy Does Not Violate Human Rights Legislation

June 23, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Richard Jordan In Stewart v. Elk Valley Coal Corporation, 2017 SCC 30, a six-judge majority of the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) confirmed a Tribunal decision which concluded that the dismissal of an…

Read More

Client Update: The Grass is Always Greener in the Other Jurisdiction – Provincial Acts and Regulations under the Cannabis Act

June 22, 2017

By Kevin Landry New Brunswick’s Working Group on the Legalization of Cannabis released an interim report on June 20, 2017. It is a huge step forward in the legalization process and the first official look at how legalization…

Read More

Client Update: Cannabis Act regulations – now we are really getting into the weeds!

June 15, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Kevin Landry As we explained in The Cannabis Act- Getting into the Weeds, the Cannabis Act introduces a regulatory regime for recreational marijuana in Canada. The regime promises to be complex. The details of legalization will be…

Read More

Client Update: Requirement to register as a lobbyist in New Brunswick

June 15, 2017

On April 1, 2017, the New Brunswick Lobbyists’ Registration Act was proclaimed into force (the “Act”), requiring active professional consultant or in-house lobbyists to register and file returns with the Office of the Integrity Commissioner of New…

Read More

How much is too much?: Disclosure in multiple accident litigation in English v House, 2017 NLTD(G) 93

June 14, 2017

Joe Thorne and Jessica Habet How far can an insurer dig into the Plaintiff’s history to defend a claim? And how much information is an insurer entitled to have in order to do so? In English v.…

Read More

Client Update: Court of Appeal confirms accounting firms may take on multiple mandates for the same company

June 14, 2017

Neil Jacobs, QC, Joe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal recently confirmed that accounting/auditing firms may take on several mandates in respect of companies that may or do become insolvent in Wabush Hotel Limited…

Read More

Negligence claims in paper-only independent medical examinations: Rubens v Sansome, 2017 NLCA 32

June 13, 2017

Joe Thorne and Brandon Gillespie An independent medical examination (“IME”) is a useful tool for insurers. An IME is an objective assessment of the claimant’s condition for the purpose of evaluating coverage and compensation. Where a…

Read More

Client Update: Mental injury? Expert diagnosis not required

June 12, 2017

On June 2, 2017 the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, clarifying the evidence needed to establish mental injury. Neither expert evidence nor a diagnosed psychiatric illness…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top