Skip to content

New reporting requirements for beneficial ownership of Nova Scotia companies

By Kimberly Bungay

On April 1, 2023, the Nova Scotia government will proclaim into force Bill 226, which amends the Companies Act (the “Act”) to require companies formed under the Act to create and maintain a register of individuals with significant control over the company.

We want to ensure that you are aware of these new requirements for Nova Scotia companies, and have the opportunity to comply with them.  Non-compliance can result in significant fines for a company, its shareholders, directors and officers, or potential imprisonment, for shareholders, directors and other relevant persons.

All companies formed under the Act, aside from public corporations, will be required to maintain a register of individuals with significant control (the “Register”).

Who has significant control?

An “individual with significant control” over a company is a person holding “a significant number of shares”, either directly or indirectly, or an individual with direct or indirect influence that, if exercised, would result in control in fact of a company.

Under the amendments, a “significant number of shares” means (1) shares that carry 25% or more of the voting rights attached to all of a company’s outstanding voting shares; or (2) that represent 25% or more of all of the company’s outstanding shares as measured by fair market value.

Content of the Register

For each individual with significant control the Register must include the following information:

  • name, date of birth and last known address;
  • jurisdiction of residence for tax purposes;
  • the day when the individual became, or ceased to be, an individual with significant control;
  • description of how the individual has significant control over a company, including a description of any interests and rights they have in shares of the company;
  • description of the steps taken by the company in each financial year to ensure the Register is complete and accurate; and
  • any other prescribed information required by regulation.

At least once in each of its financial years, the company must take reasonable steps to ensure that it has identified all individuals with significant control, and ensure that the information in the Register is accurate, complete and up to date, and must also update any information which has changed once it becomes aware of such change, within fifteen days.

Compliance and penalties

Companies may be fined up to $5,000 for failing to maintain a Register, or for failing to comply with a request for information from an investigative body.  Directors and officers can be fined up to $200,000 or imprisoned for up to six months for failing to maintain the Register, failing to respond to a request from an investigative body or allowing false or misleading information to be recorded in the Register.  Shareholders will also face imprisonment for up to six months and fines of up to $200,000 for failure to meet their obligations to provide information for the Register.

If you would like our assistance in complying with these legislative changes and preparing your Register, or if you have any questions about the new disclosure requirements, please contact us at compliance@stewartmckelvey.com.


Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Labour and Employment webinar – Mandatory vaccinations: Calling the shots

September 3, 2021

Employers are navigating uncharted territory when it comes to COVID-19 vaccines, from employee health and safety, to workplace policies, privacy and human rights concerns, a panel of Firm lawyers sit down and explore the complicated…

Read More

Final report of advisory committee on open banking

August 26, 2021

Kevin Landry and Annelise Harnanan (summer student) Recently, the Advisory Committee on Open Banking released the Final Report of the Advisory Committee on Open Banking, (“Report”) confirming its intention to implement a broader, more modernized…

Read More

Termination for just cause: do employers need to investigate? McCallum v Saputo, 2021 MBCA 62

August 25, 2021

Kathleen Nash In a recent decision, McCallum v Saputo,¹ the Manitoba Court of Appeal confirmed that an employer does not have a “free-standing, actionable duty” to investigate an employee’s conduct prior to dismissal.² The Court of Appeal held…

Read More

Canadian border re-opening: phased approach for fully vaccinated travellers

August 25, 2021

Brendan Sheridan The Government of Canada is undertaking a phased approach to re-opening the international border. While the government has had limited exemptions to the travel prohibitions throughout the pandemic, the loosening of the restrictions…

Read More

IIROC and MFDA merging into one singular self-regulated organization

August 13, 2021

Kevin Landry On August 3, 2021 the Canadian Securities Administrators (“CSA”) announced plans to combine the Investment Industry Regulation Organization of Canada (“IIROC”) with the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada (“MFDA”). This move will…

Read More

Right time to strike – Courts less reticent to strike pleadings in Newfoundland and Labrador

August 12, 2021

John Samms, with the assistance of Olivia Bungay (summer student) In a recent decision, S.D. v Eastern Regional Integrated Health Authority, 2021 NLSC 100, the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador denied the Plaintiff’s application…

Read More

What employers and employees need to know about election day in Nova Scotia

August 12, 2021

Richard Jordan and Folu Adesanya The 2021 Nova Scotia general election will be held on August 17, 2021. With the election looming, many Nova Scotians will be wondering the same question: “Am I entitled to…

Read More

Labour & Employment podcast episode #2: “The Federal Pay Equity Act and Regulations”

August 3, 2021

In the second episode of our labour and employment podcast, Workplace Issues in Atlantic Canada: A Legal Perspective, host and practice group leader Rick Dunlop speaks with Annie Gray and Dante Manna about the Federal…

Read More

Volleyball coach reinstated after recruiting student athlete charged with sexual assault

July 30, 2021

Included in Discovery: Atlantic Education & the Law – Issue 08 Clarence Bennett It is increasingly difficult to reconcile the rights of a student charged with sexual assault, with the rights of the victim, along…

Read More

In the strictest confidence: reviewing confidentiality clauses with a view to fostering engagement and limiting risk

July 28, 2021

Included in Discovery: Atlantic Education & the Law – Issue 08 Jacob Zelman Striking the proper balance Public discourse around instances of sexual violence is at an all-time high. In the wake of the #MeToo…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top