Skip to content

Navigating Canada’s economic sanctions against Russia

By Kim Walsh and Olivia Bungay

Canadian sanctions targeting Russia in relation to Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine were significantly expanded over the past year.

The Special Economic Measures (Russia) Regulations impose sanctions on individuals and entities listed in Schedule 1 (designated persons), most of whom are tied in some way to Russian oil and gas companies, financial institutions, government departments, the Russian central bank, and Russian companies that provide military services to Russia.  As recently as April 13, 2023, Canada announced additions to those listed in Schedule 1, which now contains over 1600 individuals and entities.

The sanctions effectively impose an asset freeze on designated persons. It is prohibited to deal in property of any kind that is owned, held or controlled by a designated person, no matter where that property may be located.  In addition, individuals and entities in Canada, Canadian citizens when they are outside Canada, and Canadian businesses operating outside Canada are not permitted to:

  • enter into transactions with designated persons,
  • provide financial and related services to designated persons, or
  • make goods available to designated persons.

Sanctions are not limited to dealings with designated persons, and a broad array of Russian industries including financial services, oil and gas, shipping, aviation, mining and manufacturing are targeted. For instance, Canadian businesses are not permitted to export, sell, supply or ship goods for use in oil exploration, wherever situated, to Russia or to any person in Russia. Likewise, Canadian businesses are not permitted to provide to Russia or to any person in Russia any financial, technical or other services related to any good whose export, sale, supply or shipment is intended for use in oil exploration.

Canada has also prohibited trade in luxury goods, the provision of insurance and underwriting services to the Russian aviation industry, and the provision of services like accounting, advertising, engineering, management and technical services to various Russian industries. Further, persons in Canada and Canadians outside Canada are prohibited from knowingly doing anything that causes, facilitates or assists in, or is intended to cause, facilitate or assist in, the activities prohibited by the Regulations.

It is prohibited for ships registered in Russia or used for the benefit of Russia to dock in Canada or pass through Canada, unless the docking or passage is necessary to safeguard human life or to ensure navigational safety. These restrictions are also having an impact on global supply chains.

Some Russian businesses are seeking out alternate means to secure goods and services, and to supply goods to customers, as the scope of sanctions against Russia expand. Notably, this includes the use of shell companies in jurisdictions outside Russia, designed to conceal their involvement.  Canadian businesses should therefore exercise a sufficient level of due diligence when transacting business with foreign entities, particularly when the business relationship is new, to reduce the risk of noncompliance with the Regulations.


This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact the author.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: “Lien”-ing Towards Efficiency: Upcoming Amendments to the Builders’ Lien Act

June 29, 2017

By Brian Tabor, QC and Colin Piercey Bill 81 and Bill 15, receiving Royal Assent in 2013 and 2014 respectively, are due to take effect this month. On June 30, 2017, amendments to the Builders’…

Read More

Weeding Through New Brunswick’s Latest Cannabis Recommendations

June 26, 2017

New Brunswick continues to be a thought leader in the field of regulation of recreational cannabis and provides us with a first look at what the provincial regulation of recreational cannabis might look like. New…

Read More

Client Update: Elk Valley Decision – SCC Finds that Enforcement of “No Free Accident” Rule in Workplace Drug and Alcohol Policy Does Not Violate Human Rights Legislation

June 23, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Richard Jordan In Stewart v. Elk Valley Coal Corporation, 2017 SCC 30, a six-judge majority of the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) confirmed a Tribunal decision which concluded that the dismissal of an…

Read More

Client Update: The Grass is Always Greener in the Other Jurisdiction – Provincial Acts and Regulations under the Cannabis Act

June 22, 2017

By Kevin Landry New Brunswick’s Working Group on the Legalization of Cannabis released an interim report on June 20, 2017. It is a huge step forward in the legalization process and the first official look at how legalization…

Read More

Client Update: Cannabis Act regulations – now we are really getting into the weeds!

June 15, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Kevin Landry As we explained in The Cannabis Act- Getting into the Weeds, the Cannabis Act introduces a regulatory regime for recreational marijuana in Canada. The regime promises to be complex. The details of legalization will be…

Read More

Client Update: Requirement to register as a lobbyist in New Brunswick

June 15, 2017

On April 1, 2017, the New Brunswick Lobbyists’ Registration Act was proclaimed into force (the “Act”), requiring active professional consultant or in-house lobbyists to register and file returns with the Office of the Integrity Commissioner of New…

Read More

How much is too much?: Disclosure in multiple accident litigation in English v House, 2017 NLTD(G) 93

June 14, 2017

Joe Thorne and Jessica Habet How far can an insurer dig into the Plaintiff’s history to defend a claim? And how much information is an insurer entitled to have in order to do so? In English v.…

Read More

Client Update: Court of Appeal confirms accounting firms may take on multiple mandates for the same company

June 14, 2017

Neil Jacobs, QC, Joe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal recently confirmed that accounting/auditing firms may take on several mandates in respect of companies that may or do become insolvent in Wabush Hotel Limited…

Read More

Negligence claims in paper-only independent medical examinations: Rubens v Sansome, 2017 NLCA 32

June 13, 2017

Joe Thorne and Brandon Gillespie An independent medical examination (“IME”) is a useful tool for insurers. An IME is an objective assessment of the claimant’s condition for the purpose of evaluating coverage and compensation. Where a…

Read More

Client Update: Mental injury? Expert diagnosis not required

June 12, 2017

On June 2, 2017 the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, clarifying the evidence needed to establish mental injury. Neither expert evidence nor a diagnosed psychiatric illness…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top