Navigating Canada’s economic sanctions against Russia
By Kim Walsh and Olivia Bungay
Canadian sanctions targeting Russia in relation to Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine were significantly expanded over the past year.
The Special Economic Measures (Russia) Regulations impose sanctions on individuals and entities listed in Schedule 1 (designated persons), most of whom are tied in some way to Russian oil and gas companies, financial institutions, government departments, the Russian central bank, and Russian companies that provide military services to Russia. As recently as April 13, 2023, Canada announced additions to those listed in Schedule 1, which now contains over 1600 individuals and entities.
The sanctions effectively impose an asset freeze on designated persons. It is prohibited to deal in property of any kind that is owned, held or controlled by a designated person, no matter where that property may be located. In addition, individuals and entities in Canada, Canadian citizens when they are outside Canada, and Canadian businesses operating outside Canada are not permitted to:
- enter into transactions with designated persons,
- provide financial and related services to designated persons, or
- make goods available to designated persons.
Sanctions are not limited to dealings with designated persons, and a broad array of Russian industries including financial services, oil and gas, shipping, aviation, mining and manufacturing are targeted. For instance, Canadian businesses are not permitted to export, sell, supply or ship goods for use in oil exploration, wherever situated, to Russia or to any person in Russia. Likewise, Canadian businesses are not permitted to provide to Russia or to any person in Russia any financial, technical or other services related to any good whose export, sale, supply or shipment is intended for use in oil exploration.
Canada has also prohibited trade in luxury goods, the provision of insurance and underwriting services to the Russian aviation industry, and the provision of services like accounting, advertising, engineering, management and technical services to various Russian industries. Further, persons in Canada and Canadians outside Canada are prohibited from knowingly doing anything that causes, facilitates or assists in, or is intended to cause, facilitate or assist in, the activities prohibited by the Regulations.
It is prohibited for ships registered in Russia or used for the benefit of Russia to dock in Canada or pass through Canada, unless the docking or passage is necessary to safeguard human life or to ensure navigational safety. These restrictions are also having an impact on global supply chains.
Some Russian businesses are seeking out alternate means to secure goods and services, and to supply goods to customers, as the scope of sanctions against Russia expand. Notably, this includes the use of shell companies in jurisdictions outside Russia, designed to conceal their involvement. Canadian businesses should therefore exercise a sufficient level of due diligence when transacting business with foreign entities, particularly when the business relationship is new, to reduce the risk of noncompliance with the Regulations.
This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact the author.
Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.
Archive
Vasu Sivapalan and Meg Collins On May 5, 2017, An Act Respecting the Opening of Sealed Adoption Records (“Act”) received royal assent, leading to significant changes for birth parents and adoptees across the province. As…
Read MoreJennifer Taylor Recent amendments to the Nova Scotia Insurance Act are designed “to protect the financial interests of an innocent person when the person’s property is damaged by another person with whom that person shares…
Read MoreBrian G. Johnston, QC Cannabis legalization is coming. The legislation is expected to pass by July with legalization becoming effective by September. Employers should take notice because: 1. There is already a lot of cannabis…
Read MoreJanet Clark and Sean Seviour A recent decision from the Supreme Court of Canada clarifies determination of what is “reasonably foreseeable”: Rankin (Rankin’s Garage & Sales) v J.J., 2018 SCC 19. The case involved two…
Read MoreJennifer Taylor & Michelle Chai A recent Supreme Court decision tackled two issues that have proven complex in Nova Scotia law: summary judgment and limitation periods. The Plaintiff in Cameron v Nova Scotia Association of…
Read MoreBrian G. Johnston, QC The Arbitrator in Lower Churchill Transmission Construction Employers’ Association and IBEW, Local 1620 dismissed a grievance on April 30, 2018 concluding: The Employer did not place the Grievor in employment at…
Read MoreRick Dunlop and Richard Jordan Employers, and benefit providers on their behalf, make policy decisions as to what drugs or benefits (including monetary limits) will be covered by benefit plans. The Board of Trustees in…
Read MoreErin Best The decision of Justice Handrigan in Ryan v. Curlew is the first motor vehicle accident personal injury decision to come out of the Newfoundland and Labrador courts in quite some time. The case…
Read MoreRob Aske The arrival of spring should bring thoughts of renewal… to your privacy practices. Breach reporting under PIPEDA Canada’s federal privacy law known by the acronym PIPEDA (Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act)…
Read MoreChad Sullivan Overview An Indigenous law professor filed a human rights complaint against the University of British Columbia claiming the university discriminated against her in failing to consider her less traditional scholarly work as akin…
Read More