Skip to content

IRCC expands authorization for foreign workers to study without a study permit: Four things you need to know

By Sara Espinal Henao

Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (“IRCC”) has announced a promising new temporary measure that allows foreign workers to study for a longer duration without a study permit, opening the door for career advancement through education.

Prior to the introduction of this policy, foreign workers were only able to study while working if their study program was six months or less in duration. Otherwise, a separate application for a study permit was required.

The new three-year policy now applies to foreign workers in Canada who hold a valid work permit issued on or before June 7, 2023 or who are on maintained status (i.e. those who have applied for a new work permit to extend their work authorization) and have a work authorization letter that was issued on or before June 7, 2023. Foreign workers in Quebec are also able to study without a study permit and are exempt from the requirement to obtain a Quebec Acceptance Certificate (CAQ) to complete educational programs in the province.

How it works

Foreign workers hoping to benefit from this policy do not need to make new applications. Instead, they can simply provide the learning institution they will be attending with a copy of their valid work permit or work authorization letter, depending on their specific case, as well as the government correspondence they would receive indicating they qualify for the policy.

To keep in mind

This measure is a welcome development for foreign workers seeking educational programs for professional advancement, but it must be applied with care. Importantly, workers must be mindful of several nuances:

  1. How long you can study: A foreign worker’s authorization to study full time while working would only apply throughout the validity of work permit, or until the public measure expires on June 27, 2026, whichever comes first. Foreign workers benefiting from the policy while on maintained status must have their work permit approved in order to continue studying; otherwise, they would lose the authorization to study from the date of refusal of their work permit application – and their ability to study will again be the earliest of the new work permit expiry date or June 27, 2026.
    Moreover, this measure is intended to temporarily benefit those whose primary purpose in Canada is to work; it is not designed to operate as a blanket study permit exemption for temporary residents with foreign worker history. Those who wish to register for a program or continue studying past the duration of their current permit or the public measure’s expiry would still need to apply for a study permit moving forward.
  2. Adhering to work permit terms and conditions: Additionally, foreign workers on employer and occupation-specific work permits must still abide by the terms of their work permits while benefiting from the policy. As such, if an educational program would require a reduction in the number of work hours or a change in location that conflicts with the worker’s specific work permit, the worker will be responsible for applying to change the conditions of their permit to authorize those new terms of employment. Failure to do this can lead to non-compliance and inadmissibility issues for both the worker and their employer.
  3. Post-Graduation Work Permit eligibility: International students are often able to apply for an open Post-Graduation Work Permit upon graduation from a Canadian study program. However, the individual must hold a study permit to be eligible (and meet all other eligibility requirements) to obtain this type of work permit. Individuals studying under this temporary public policy will not be eligible for a Post-Graduation Work Permit, as they will not have obtained a study permit.
  4. Permanent residence prospects: Lastly, while this policy certainly goes a long way in expanding the range of authorized activities for workers in Canada, it can have a negative impact on their prospects for permanent residence. Foreign workers considering going back to school under the policy must be aware that any Canadian work experience gained during a period of full-time study will not count toward eligibility for the Canadian Experience Class. Similarly, students will not earn Express Entry Comprehensive Ranking System (“CRS”) points for this experience. Therefore, foreign workers contemplating permanent residence and relying on their Canadian work experience to that end might want to consider part-time study to not jeopardize their permanent resident eligibility down the road. It is important to also address the possible benefits of studying under this policy for permanent residence opportunities down the line. For example, if a foreign worker is able to achieve a higher level of education while studying under this policy, that may boost their CRS points for express entry. Similarly, studying in Canada may improve the foreign worker’s English or French language ability, allowing them to perform better on a language test and again achieve a higher CRS score as a result.

This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Immigration Group.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Prince Edward Island adopts new Municipal Government Act

December 22, 2016

Perlene Morrison Prince Edward Island’s municipal legislation is being modernized with the implementation of the Municipal Government Act (the “MGA”). The legislation has now received royal assent and will be proclaimed in force at a future date.…

Read More

Land Use Planning in Prince Edward Island: The Year in Review

December 20, 2016

Jonathan Coady and Chera-Lee Gomez It’s that time of year – the moment when we look back at the year that was and chart our course for the year ahead. For many councillors, administrators and planning professionals…

Read More

The Latest in Labour Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Onsite OHS liability: Who is (and who is not) the true constructor?

December 15, 2016

Peter McLellan, QC and Michelle Black In a recent decision, R v McCarthy’s Roofing Limited, Judge Anne Derrick provided some much-needed clarity around what it means to be a “constructor” on a job site. This is critical as…

Read More

Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?

December 15, 2016

Rick Dunlop On December 13, 2016, the Government of Canada released A Framework for the Legalization and Regulation of Cannabis in Canada: The Final Report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation (“Report”). The Report’s…

Read More

Canadian employers facing marijuana challenges in the workplace

November 25, 2016

Brian Johnston, QC Canadian employers are already coping with approximately 75,000 Canadians authorized to use medical marijuana. Health Canada expects that this number will increase to about 450,000 by 2024. Employers know that medical marijuana…

Read More

You’ve got mail – Ontario Court of Appeal sends a constitutional message to municipalities about community mailboxes

October 28, 2016

Jonathan Coady With its decision in Canada Post Corporation v. City of Hamilton,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal has confirmed that the placement of community mailboxes by Canada Post is a matter beyond the reach of municipalities…

Read More

A window on interpreting insurance contracts: Top 10 points from Ledcor Construction

September 23, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Thanks to some dirty windows, insurance lawyers have a new go-to Supreme Court case on issues of policy interpretation: Ledcor Construction Ltd v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co, 2016 SCC 37. The insurers in Ledcor Construction had…

Read More

Charter-ing a Different Course? Two decisions on TWU’s proposed law school

August 11, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…

Read More

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40

August 11, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…

Read More

Client Update: SCC issues major decision affecting federal employers: Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited

July 15, 2016

On July 14, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a significant decision affecting federally regulated employers across Canada. In Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited the Court held that the purpose of the unjust dismissal…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top