Skip to content

Clean sweep: Federal Government tables legislation for Clean Technology Investment Tax Credit

By Sadira Jan, Dave Randell, Graham Haynes & Tyler Callahan

On November 30, 2023, the Federal Government tabled Bill C-59, entitled An Act to implement certain provisions of the fall economic statement tabled in Parliament on November 21, 2023 and certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 28, 2023 (“Bill C-59”).

Bill C-59 proposes amendments to the Income Tax Act (Canada) which will implement certain “clean economy” priorities discussed in Budget 2023 and the 2023 Fall Economic Statement, including the Clean Technology Investment Tax Credit (the “CTITC”).

The CTITC is one of five new federal “clean economy” tax incentives being introduced[1]. We previously discussed the proposed terms of the CTITC shortly after the 2022 Fall Economic Statement, and in this article provides an update on the changes and clarifications provided by Bill C-59.

Overview

The CTITC is a proposed refundable tax credit which allows “qualifying taxpayers” to claim an income tax credit of up to 30% of the capital cost of “clean technology property”, which they acquired on or after March 29, 2023, and before January 1, 2035.

Applicability 

Bill C-59 expands the definition of qualifying taxpayer to include, besides taxable Canadian corporations and taxable Canadian corporations that are a member of a partnership, mutual funds trusts that are real estate investment trusts.

Eligible Purchases

Bill C-59 defines “clean technology property” to include:

  • equipment used to generate electricity from solar, wind and water energy;
  • stationary electricity storage equipment, excluding any equipment that uses fossil fuels in operation;
  • active solar heating equipment, air-source heat pumps, and ground-source heat pumps;
  • non-road zero-emission vehicles plus related charging or refueling equipment;
  • equipment used to generate electricity and/or heat solely from geothermal energy, excluding any equipment that extracts fossil fuels for sale;
  • concentrated solar equipment; and
  • small modular nuclear reactors.

Notwithstanding the above, Bill C-59 also requires that the clean technology property:

  • be situated in Canada and intended for use exclusively in Canada;
  • be new, or was not acquired or used for any purpose before it was acquired by the taxpayer (based on the available for use rules in the Income Tax Act (Canada)); and
  • if the property is to be leased:
    • the lessee must be a qualifying taxpayer;
    • the property must be leased in the lessor’s ordinary course of carrying on a business in Canada; and
    • the lessor’s principal business must be selling or servicing property of that type, or leasing property, lending money or purchasing financial assets representation all or part of the sale price of merchandise or services or any combination thereof.

Credit Amount

Bill C-59 provides that new clean technology property purchased by an eligible taxpayer after March 28, 2023, and before January 1, 2034, will be eligible for a CTITC of up to 30% of the equipment’s capital cost while such property purchased in the final year of the program, between December 31, 2033, and January 1, 2035, will be eligible for a CTITC of up to 15% of the equipment’s capital cost. New clean technology property purchased by a taxpayer on or after January 1, 2035, will not be eligible for a CTITC.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, there are some limitations on the amount of the CTITC that can be claimed by an eligible taxpayer, and these include the following:

  • Government Assistance: the amount of the CTITC claimed must be reduced by any governmental or non-governmental assistance that can reasonably be considered to be in respect of the clean technology property, provided there is a mechanism for capital cost add-back;
  • Unpaid Amounts: the amount of the CTITC claimed must be reduced by any cost not paid within 180 days of the end of the taxation year in which a CTITC is claimed, provided there is a mechanism for adding-back such amounts to the capital cost of the clean technology property in the event it is repaid (or no longer expected to be received); and
  • Labour Requirements: all applicable credit percentages must be reduced by 10% if the taxpayer does not meet certain labour requirements (detailed below).

Labour Requirements

There are two primary labour requirements set out in Bill C-59 which must be met in order to obtain the full benefit of the CTITC.

First, all workers employed in the preparation or installation of clean technology property must be unionized and compensated pursuant to a collective agreement in accordance with the workers’ skill, experience, and the work required. Workers must be notified of the fact that the work site is subject to the wage requirement in plain language, such that workers will be able to report non-compliance with the wage requirement.

Second, reasonable efforts must be made to ensure that apprentices registered in a Red Seal trade work at least 10% of the total hours worked by Red Seal workers at the site. If the collective agreement does not permit at least 10% of the total hours worked to be completed by apprentices, as many apprentices as permitted by law must be involved with the work being completed.

Employers should be aware that a stakeholder who attempts to claim the full amount of a CTITC without complying with the labour requirements may be subject to tax penalties.

Looking Forward

As with all Federal legislation, the Act must go through a first, second, and third reading before Parliament and the Senate before receiving Royal Assent and officially becoming law. As of the date of this publication, Bill C-59 has completed its first reading before Parliament. If Bill C-59 receives Royal Assent, the CTITC provisions summarized in this article will be effective as of March 28, 2023.

Atlantic Canadian businesses will be able to benefit from both the CTITC and the existing Atlantic Investment Tax Credit on certain capital expenditures. The Atlantic Investment Tax Credit, for reference, was established in March, 2012, and provides a refundable credit of up to 10% of the value of new qualified property purchased in the Atlantic Provinces and the Gaspé Peninsula which includes, among other things, energy generation and conservation property.


This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Tax Group or our Energy Group.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

[1] The others include: the carbon capture, utilization, and storage investment tax credit, the clean electricity investment tax credit, the clean hydrogen investment tax credit, and the clean technology manufacturing tax credit.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: Adopting the changes – amendments to the New Brunswick Family Services Act lead to opening of sealed adoption records

June 4, 2018

Vasu Sivapalan and Meg Collins On May 5, 2017, An Act Respecting the Opening of Sealed Adoption Records (“Act”) received royal assent, leading to significant changes for birth parents and adoptees across the province. As…

Read More

Client Update – Protecting the innocent in property insurance: recent amendments to Nova Scotia’s Insurance Act limit “criminal or intentional act” exclusion clauses

May 29, 2018

Jennifer Taylor Recent amendments to the Nova Scotia Insurance Act are designed “to protect the financial interests of an innocent person when the person’s property is damaged by another person with whom that person shares…

Read More

Countdown to Cannabis: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter: The legalization of cannabis: 7 reasons why employers should take notice

May 24, 2018

Brian G. Johnston, QC Cannabis legalization is coming. The legislation is expected to pass by July with legalization becoming effective by September. Employers should take notice because: 1. There is already a lot of cannabis…

Read More

Client Update: Negligence: what is reasonably foreseeable?

May 24, 2018

Janet Clark and Sean Seviour A recent decision from the Supreme Court of Canada clarifies determination of what is “reasonably foreseeable”: Rankin (Rankin’s Garage & Sales) v J.J., 2018 SCC 19.  The case involved two…

Read More

Client Update: Limitation periods & denial of LTD benefits: the NSSC decision in Cameron

May 9, 2018

Jennifer Taylor & Michelle Chai A recent Supreme Court decision tackled two issues that have proven complex in Nova Scotia law: summary judgment and limitation periods. The Plaintiff in Cameron v Nova Scotia Association of…

Read More

Client Update: Medical marijuana found to be undue hardship in safety sensitive positions – the problem of residual impairment

May 1, 2018

Brian G. Johnston, QC The Arbitrator in Lower Churchill Transmission Construction Employers’ Association and IBEW, Local 1620 dismissed a grievance on April 30, 2018 concluding: The Employer did not place the Grievor in employment at…

Read More

Client Update: Benefits plans really do not have to cover the sun, the moon and the stars (and medical cannabis)

April 13, 2018

Rick Dunlop and Richard Jordan Employers, and benefit providers on their behalf, make policy decisions as to what drugs or benefits (including monetary limits) will be covered by benefit plans. The Board of Trustees in…

Read More

Client Update: Court Confirms: Credibility is a Key Factor In Personal Injury Awards (Ryan V. Curlew, 2018 NL SC)

April 10, 2018

Erin Best The decision of Justice Handrigan in Ryan v. Curlew is the first motor vehicle accident personal injury decision to come out of the Newfoundland and Labrador courts in quite some time. The case…

Read More

Client Update: Does your business need a spring privacy tune-up? Breach reporting and Europe’s GDPR are about to hatch

April 6, 2018

Rob Aske The arrival of spring should bring thoughts of renewal… to your privacy practices. Breach reporting under PIPEDA Canada’s federal privacy law known by the acronym PIPEDA (Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act)…

Read More

Client Update: Untenable tenure: discrimination complaint from Indigenous professor dismissed

March 22, 2018

Chad Sullivan Overview An Indigenous law professor filed a human rights complaint against the University of British Columbia claiming the university discriminated against her in failing to consider her less traditional scholarly work as akin…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top