Bill C-365 calls for plan for implementation of open banking in Canada
By Kevin Landry
On November 9 2023, Bill C-365, An Act respecting the implementation of a consumer-led banking system for Canadians (“C-365”), short titled as the ‘Consumer-led Banking Act’ was read in the House of Commons.
C-365 follows several other recent developments in the fintech and payments space in Canada, namely the release of the Retail Payment Activities Regulations, and the Retail Payments Activities Act.[1] Importantly, it is a push toward implementation of open banking in Canada, which has been moving slowly forward in past years.
C-365 is not a plan for open banking in Canada; it calls for the implementation of a plan for open banking in Canada within 30 days of coming into force (or ten days after the start of the next session of the House). It would also require the Minister of Finance to table a report setting out reasons for any delay in the implementation of a bill on open banking if not tabled within six months of C-365 coming into force.
Background
In March 2022, the Federal Government named Abraham Tachjian as the open banking lead, and was mandated to develop a ‘made in Canada’ regime based on the recommendations in the final report of the Advisory Committee on Open Banking. Although progress on implementation is ongoing, no implementation plan has been released to date.
Open banking is currently in use in Australia and the United Kingdom. There have been several phases to this discussion in Canada, and more information on past activity and future steps is available online.
What is open banking?
Currently in Canada most fintech apps operate via ‘screen scraping’- a user provides their banking log-in information to a third-party application who enters the users online banking, takes applicable data and uses it for purposes of the app. This poses obvious security risks and can give fintech companies access to passwords, transaction information and other sensitive data. Sharing passwords in this fashion can also leave consumers in breach of bank terms of service and at fault for fraudulent activities of nefarious fintech actors.
Open banking is a system that allows ownership of financial data by the user in some form. It would allow banks to securely share users’ financial data with an app on the user’s behalf using a secured online channel. It would no longer be necessary to provide banking passwords and credentials to access fintech products and services.
This update is intended for general information only. If you have questions about the above, please contact the author(s) to discuss your needs for specific legal advice relating to the particular circumstances of your situation.
Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.
[1] Stewart McKelvey had previously written about these here, here and here
Archive
Perlene Morrison Prince Edward Island’s municipal legislation is being modernized with the implementation of the Municipal Government Act (the “MGA”). The legislation has now received royal assent and will be proclaimed in force at a future date.…
Read MoreJonathan Coady and Chera-Lee Gomez It’s that time of year – the moment when we look back at the year that was and chart our course for the year ahead. For many councillors, administrators and planning professionals…
Read MorePeter McLellan, QC and Michelle Black In a recent decision, R v McCarthy’s Roofing Limited, Judge Anne Derrick provided some much-needed clarity around what it means to be a “constructor” on a job site. This is critical as…
Read MoreRick Dunlop On December 13, 2016, the Government of Canada released A Framework for the Legalization and Regulation of Cannabis in Canada: The Final Report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation (“Report”). The Report’s…
Read MoreBrian Johnston, QC Canadian employers are already coping with approximately 75,000 Canadians authorized to use medical marijuana. Health Canada expects that this number will increase to about 450,000 by 2024. Employers know that medical marijuana…
Read MoreJonathan Coady With its decision in Canada Post Corporation v. City of Hamilton,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal has confirmed that the placement of community mailboxes by Canada Post is a matter beyond the reach of municipalities…
Read MoreJennifer Taylor Introduction Thanks to some dirty windows, insurance lawyers have a new go-to Supreme Court case on issues of policy interpretation: Ledcor Construction Ltd v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co, 2016 SCC 37. The insurers in Ledcor Construction had…
Read MoreJennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…
Read MoreJoe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…
Read MoreOn July 14, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a significant decision affecting federally regulated employers across Canada. In Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited the Court held that the purpose of the unjust dismissal…
Read More