Skip to content

Bill C-365 calls for plan for implementation of open banking in Canada

By Kevin Landry

On November 9 2023, Bill C-365, An Act respecting the implementation of a consumer-led banking system for Canadians (“C-365”), short titled as the ‘Consumer-led Banking Act’ was read in the House of Commons.

C-365 follows several other recent developments in the fintech and payments space in Canada, namely the release of the Retail Payment Activities Regulations, and the Retail Payments Activities Act.[1] Importantly, it is a push toward implementation of open banking in Canada, which has been moving slowly forward in past years.

C-365 is not a plan for open banking in Canada; it calls for the implementation of a plan for open banking in Canada within 30 days of coming into force (or ten days after the start of the next session of the House). It would also require the Minister of Finance to table a report setting out reasons for any delay in the implementation of a bill on open banking if not tabled within six months of C-365 coming into force.

Background

In March 2022, the Federal Government named Abraham Tachjian as the open banking lead, and was mandated to develop a ‘made in Canada’ regime based on the recommendations in the final report of the Advisory Committee on Open Banking. Although progress on implementation is ongoing, no implementation plan has been released to date.

Open banking is currently in use in Australia and the United Kingdom. There have been several phases to this discussion in Canada, and more information on past activity and future steps is available online.

What is open banking?

Currently in Canada most fintech apps operate via ‘screen scraping’- a user provides their banking log-in information to a third-party application who enters the users online banking, takes applicable data and uses it for purposes of the app. This poses obvious security risks and can give fintech companies access to passwords, transaction information and other sensitive data. Sharing passwords in this fashion can also leave consumers in breach of bank terms of service and at fault for fraudulent activities of nefarious fintech actors.

Open banking is a system that allows ownership of financial data by the user in some form. It would allow banks to securely share users’ financial data with an app on the user’s behalf using a secured online channel. It would no longer be necessary to provide banking passwords and credentials to access fintech products and services.


This update is intended for general information only. If you have questions about the above, please contact the author(s) to discuss your needs for specific legal advice relating to the particular circumstances of your situation.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.


[1] Stewart McKelvey had previously written about these here, here and here

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: Adopting the changes – amendments to the New Brunswick Family Services Act lead to opening of sealed adoption records

June 4, 2018

Vasu Sivapalan and Meg Collins On May 5, 2017, An Act Respecting the Opening of Sealed Adoption Records (“Act”) received royal assent, leading to significant changes for birth parents and adoptees across the province. As…

Read More

Client Update – Protecting the innocent in property insurance: recent amendments to Nova Scotia’s Insurance Act limit “criminal or intentional act” exclusion clauses

May 29, 2018

Jennifer Taylor Recent amendments to the Nova Scotia Insurance Act are designed “to protect the financial interests of an innocent person when the person’s property is damaged by another person with whom that person shares…

Read More

Countdown to Cannabis: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter: The legalization of cannabis: 7 reasons why employers should take notice

May 24, 2018

Brian G. Johnston, QC Cannabis legalization is coming. The legislation is expected to pass by July with legalization becoming effective by September. Employers should take notice because: 1. There is already a lot of cannabis…

Read More

Client Update: Negligence: what is reasonably foreseeable?

May 24, 2018

Janet Clark and Sean Seviour A recent decision from the Supreme Court of Canada clarifies determination of what is “reasonably foreseeable”: Rankin (Rankin’s Garage & Sales) v J.J., 2018 SCC 19.  The case involved two…

Read More

Client Update: Limitation periods & denial of LTD benefits: the NSSC decision in Cameron

May 9, 2018

Jennifer Taylor & Michelle Chai A recent Supreme Court decision tackled two issues that have proven complex in Nova Scotia law: summary judgment and limitation periods. The Plaintiff in Cameron v Nova Scotia Association of…

Read More

Client Update: Medical marijuana found to be undue hardship in safety sensitive positions – the problem of residual impairment

May 1, 2018

Brian G. Johnston, QC The Arbitrator in Lower Churchill Transmission Construction Employers’ Association and IBEW, Local 1620 dismissed a grievance on April 30, 2018 concluding: The Employer did not place the Grievor in employment at…

Read More

Client Update: Benefits plans really do not have to cover the sun, the moon and the stars (and medical cannabis)

April 13, 2018

Rick Dunlop and Richard Jordan Employers, and benefit providers on their behalf, make policy decisions as to what drugs or benefits (including monetary limits) will be covered by benefit plans. The Board of Trustees in…

Read More

Client Update: Court Confirms: Credibility is a Key Factor In Personal Injury Awards (Ryan V. Curlew, 2018 NL SC)

April 10, 2018

Erin Best The decision of Justice Handrigan in Ryan v. Curlew is the first motor vehicle accident personal injury decision to come out of the Newfoundland and Labrador courts in quite some time. The case…

Read More

Client Update: Does your business need a spring privacy tune-up? Breach reporting and Europe’s GDPR are about to hatch

April 6, 2018

Rob Aske The arrival of spring should bring thoughts of renewal… to your privacy practices. Breach reporting under PIPEDA Canada’s federal privacy law known by the acronym PIPEDA (Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act)…

Read More

Client Update: Untenable tenure: discrimination complaint from Indigenous professor dismissed

March 22, 2018

Chad Sullivan Overview An Indigenous law professor filed a human rights complaint against the University of British Columbia claiming the university discriminated against her in failing to consider her less traditional scholarly work as akin…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top