Amendments to the Canada Business Corporations Act affecting registers of individuals with significant control
By Kimberly Bungay and Colton Smith
Since June of 2019, corporations formed under the Canada Business Corporations Act have been required to prepare and maintain a register of individuals with significant control (an “ISC Register”). ISC registers are to contain information on individuals who hold “significant control” over the corporation.
The requirement for ISC Registers was implemented in order to combat money laundering and other financial crimes, and to bring Canada in line with its international partners, in preventing financial crimes.
Who has significant control?
An “individual with significant control” over a company is a person holding “a significant number of shares”, either directly or indirectly, or an individual with direct or indirect influence that, if exercised, would result in control in fact of a company.
A “significant number of shares” means (1) shares that carry 25% or more of the voting rights attached to all of a company’s outstanding voting shares; or (2) that represent 25% or more of all of the company’s outstanding shares as measured by fair market value.
Content of the Register
Currently, for each individual with significant control the ISC Register must include the following information:
- name, date of birth and latest known address;
- jurisdiction of residence for tax purposes;
- the day when the individual became, or ceased to be, an individual with significant control;
- description of how the individual has significant control over a company, including a description of any interests and rights they have in shares of the company;
- description of the steps taken by the company in each financial year to ensure the Register is complete and accurate;
- any other prescribed information required by regulation; and
- a description of the steps taken to determine the information in the ISC Register.
Bill C-42
On June 1, 2023, Bill C-42, An Act to Amend the Canada Business Corporations Act and to Make Consequential and Related Amendments to Other Acts received its second reading in Parliament. Bill C-42, if passed:
- would require the ISC Register to include the residential address, address for service (if any) and the citizenship of each beneficial owner.
- would require corporations to provide their ISC Register to Corporations Canada annually, and/or within 15 days of any changes to the ISC Register.
- would allow Corporations Canada to create a publicly accessible register of certain information contained in an ISC Register, including the names, address for service or residential address and the share ownership of each individual with significant control. The publicly accessible register is planned to include beneficial ownership information collected by the provinces and territories that choose to participate.
- would allow Corporations Canada to share information collected with the Canada Revenue Agency and other investigative bodies.
- would increase the penalties for non-compliance with beneficial ownership reporting rules to a fine of up to $200,000 and/or up to six months imprisonment.
If you would like our assistance in complying with your legislative requirements or preparing your Register, or if you have any questions about the proposed disclosure requirements or would like to be informed if these proposed changes are to be brought into effect, please contact us at compliance@stewartmckelvey.com.
This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact the author.
Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.
Archive
Kathleen Leighton Employers in Canada are obligated to only employ individuals who are legally able to work for them. Individuals who are neither citizens nor permanent residents of Canada, but who wish to work in…
Read MoreTwila Reid, Jennifer Taylor and Richard Jordan The Supreme Court of Canada has revolutionized administrative law (again) with its new standard of review decision, Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov. The decision reflects…
Read MoreJonathan Coady, QC and Michael Fleischmann Once again, the time has come to review the year that was and to chart the course for the year ahead. For municipalities and planning professionals in Prince Edward Island,…
Read MoreWe are pleased to present Beyond the border, a quarterly publication aimed at providing the latest information to clients about new programs and other immigration-related information that may be pertinent to employers of foreign workers…
Read MoreWe are pleased to present the fifth issue of Discovery, our very own legal publication targeted to educational institutions in Atlantic Canada. As the pace around campus turns up as universities and colleges begin a…
Read MoreLevel Chan and Dante Manna On October 31, 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada issued its decision in Threlfall v Carleton University, 2019 SCC 50, dismissing an appeal from the Quebec Court of Appeal. Carleton…
Read MoreAndrew Burke, Colleen Keyes and David Slipp Starting January 1, 2020 “Distributing Corporations” under the Canada Business Corporations Act (“CBCA”) will be subject to new disclosure requirements relating to the diversity of directors and senior…
Read MoreDaniela Bassan Last month, the Supreme Court of Canada released its much-anticipated decision in Keatley Surveying Ltd. v Teranet Inc., 2019 SCC 43. This was a certified class proceeding on behalf of all land surveyors…
Read MoreKillian McParland With the federal election coming up next week on October 21, 2019, it is a good time for a reminder of the employer obligations under the Canada Elections Act. Employees who are eligible…
Read MoreJohn Samms The upcoming federal election is drawing near. You may be thinking about exercising your democratic and constitutional right to vote – you may not be. You may never even consider participating in the…
Read More