Amendments to the Canada Business Corporations Act affecting registers of individuals with significant control
By Kimberly Bungay and Colton Smith
Since June of 2019, corporations formed under the Canada Business Corporations Act have been required to prepare and maintain a register of individuals with significant control (an “ISC Register”). ISC registers are to contain information on individuals who hold “significant control” over the corporation.
The requirement for ISC Registers was implemented in order to combat money laundering and other financial crimes, and to bring Canada in line with its international partners, in preventing financial crimes.
Who has significant control?
An “individual with significant control” over a company is a person holding “a significant number of shares”, either directly or indirectly, or an individual with direct or indirect influence that, if exercised, would result in control in fact of a company.
A “significant number of shares” means (1) shares that carry 25% or more of the voting rights attached to all of a company’s outstanding voting shares; or (2) that represent 25% or more of all of the company’s outstanding shares as measured by fair market value.
Content of the Register
Currently, for each individual with significant control the ISC Register must include the following information:
- name, date of birth and latest known address;
- jurisdiction of residence for tax purposes;
- the day when the individual became, or ceased to be, an individual with significant control;
- description of how the individual has significant control over a company, including a description of any interests and rights they have in shares of the company;
- description of the steps taken by the company in each financial year to ensure the Register is complete and accurate;
- any other prescribed information required by regulation; and
- a description of the steps taken to determine the information in the ISC Register.
Bill C-42
On June 1, 2023, Bill C-42, An Act to Amend the Canada Business Corporations Act and to Make Consequential and Related Amendments to Other Acts received its second reading in Parliament. Bill C-42, if passed:
- would require the ISC Register to include the residential address, address for service (if any) and the citizenship of each beneficial owner.
- would require corporations to provide their ISC Register to Corporations Canada annually, and/or within 15 days of any changes to the ISC Register.
- would allow Corporations Canada to create a publicly accessible register of certain information contained in an ISC Register, including the names, address for service or residential address and the share ownership of each individual with significant control. The publicly accessible register is planned to include beneficial ownership information collected by the provinces and territories that choose to participate.
- would allow Corporations Canada to share information collected with the Canada Revenue Agency and other investigative bodies.
- would increase the penalties for non-compliance with beneficial ownership reporting rules to a fine of up to $200,000 and/or up to six months imprisonment.
If you would like our assistance in complying with your legislative requirements or preparing your Register, or if you have any questions about the proposed disclosure requirements or would like to be informed if these proposed changes are to be brought into effect, please contact us at compliance@stewartmckelvey.com.
This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact the author.
Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.
Archive
Kevin Landry and Emily Murray On March 8, 2021, Health Canada released draft guidance on personal production of cannabis for medical purposes (“Guidance Document”). At present, the Guidance Document is being circulated for public comment for…
Read MoreJennifer Taylor The Supreme Court of Nova Scotia has finally provided clarity on the limitation period for third party claims, in Sears v Top O’ the Mountain Apartments Limited, 2021 NSSC 80. This is…
Read MoreBrendan Sheridan Canada has continually claimed to be one of the countries with the toughest COVID-19 related travel and quarantine requirements. In response to the new COVID-19 variants emerging in the UK and South Africa,…
Read MoreDante Manna As of today, Newfoundland and Labrador has joined several other jurisdictions with financial hardship unlocking provisions. While the new provisions do not allow direct unlocking from pension plans, and unlocking is not available…
Read MoreNancy Rubin, QC Nova Scotia has taken a big step forward in recognizing the tort of publication of private facts. The case, Racki v Racki, 2021 NSSC 46 comes hot on the heels of Ontario’s…
Read MoreKathleen Leighton Canada is committed to developing Francophone minority communities in the country (outside of Quebec). In furtherance of this goal, there are a number of immigration initiatives in place to attract French speakers. By…
Read MoreAndrew Burke and Divya Subramanian The year 2020 was nothing short of unusual. With COVID-19 impacting every aspect of business and life, shareholder meetings also transitioned to a virtual medium. For more on how the…
Read MoreChad Sullivan and Kathleen Nash Overview The issue of hateful and harassing social media communication has garnered much attention in both the media and, more recently, in the courtroom. In Caplan v Atas,¹ Justice Corbett…
Read MoreDaniel MacKenzie and James Galsworthy On January 15, 2021, the United Kingdom’s Supreme Court (“Court”) issued a decision which is likely to be viewed as good news for policy holders who have endured business interruption…
Read MoreGrant Machum, ICD.D and Mark Tector 2020 was a challenging year for many people and businesses. And while we are all happy to have 2020 in the rearview mirror, we anticipate that there will continue to…
Read More