Skip to content

Updated employer compliance requirements for employers of foreign workers

This article was updated on May 4, 2023.


By Brendan Sheridan

The Government of Canada has recently taken steps to further protect foreign workers employed in Canada. These efforts by the government have, in some cases, created additional obligations that employers must comply with while strengthening others.

The recent changes came into effect on September 26, 2022 when the amendments to the Immigration, Refugees and Protection Regulations (“IRPR”) were implemented. These amendments are in response to the 2016 report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities (“HUMA”), and aim to address gaps in worker protection, expand existing program policies, and strengthen program integrity.[1] As these amendments do have a significant impact on an employer’s obligations when employing foreign workers, it is vital for employers to update their practices to remain compliant.

Below we summarize the major changes and the impact to employers. Please note that this article only touches on the significant updates and does not discuss all new employer compliance obligations or those that have remained unchanged.

LMIA – New Employer Workplace Abuse Review

The government’s first significant update targets employers who have not employed a foreign worker within the past six years. Specifically, all new employers applying for a Labour Market Impact Assessment Application (“LMIA”) are now subject to a review of their “reasonable efforts” to provide a workplace that is free from abuse. In particular, the review will confirm whether these employers have made proactive efforts to prevent workplace abuse and taken reactive measure to stop abuse.

These employers will also be subject to a review of whether they are an affiliate of an employer that is ineligible for the temporary foreign worker program or in default of an administrative monetary penalty. An affiliate for this purpose includes two employers that are under common control or that are not operated at arm’s length.

Employers who have not employed a foreign worker within the past six years should ensure their workplace harassment policy is updated prior to applying for an LMIA to prepare for this review. While returning employers are not subject to this review, it is nonetheless important for them to maintain an up-to-date policy due to the emphasis the government is placing on ensuring foreign workers are provided with a workplace free of abuse.

Provide Temporary Foreign Workers with Information about their Rights

In an effort to ensure that foreign workers are aware of their rights while in Canada, the government is now requiring that all employers provide their foreign national employees with information regarding their rights. This information must be provided to the foreign workers on or before their first day of work and must be made available to them throughout their employment. The Government of Canada has prepared information packages for the Temporary Foreign Worker Program (“TFWP”) and International Mobility Program (“IMP”) respectively with the necessary rights information:

As a reminder, the TFWP includes all workers working pursuant to LMIA-based work permits, while IMP includes LMIA-exempt work permit categories.

Provide Temporary Foreign Workers with their Employment Contract

While it is already common practice for most businesses, employers are now obligated to provide their foreign workers with copies of their employment contracts before they begin their employment in Canada. The government has implemented this new obligation to ensure that Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada (“IRCC”); Employment and Social Development Canada (“ESDC”); the employer, and the foreign worker all have the same information regarding the worker’s conditions of employment.[2]

To comply with this obligation, the contract provided to the foreign worker must be in their Canadian language of choice (English or French). It must be signed by both the employer and foreign national and must provide for employment in the same occupation and with the same wages and working conditions as set out in the offer of employment that was made as part of the LMIA or LMIA-exempt work permit.

The timing of when the contract must be provided to the foreign worker depends on whether the foreign worker is obtaining a work permit through the TFWP or the IMP. Workers falling under the TFWP must be provided with a copy of their contract on or before their first day of employment. Alternatively, workers under the IMP must be provided with a copy of their contract before the company submits their Online Offer of Employment or Employer Compliance Submission as part of the foreign worker’s work permit application process.

Provide Temporary Foreign Workers with Access to Health Care

As part of the new employer obligations, the government is also ensuring that all foreign workers have access to emergency health care services. This includes requiring that all employers make reasonable efforts to provide access to health care services when a temporary foreign worker is injured or becomes ill at the workplace. This is applicable to all employers, regardless of whether the worker obtained their work permit under the TFWP or the IMP.

The Government of Canada has provided examples of what constitutes “reasonable efforts” such as ensuring there is a telephone available for the foreign worker to use to contact emergency services and / or organizing transportation to a hospital or doctor. While there is an obligation that the employer makes these efforts, there is no requirement under this obligation that the employer pays for the transportation to the hospital or doctor.

Temporarily Provide Temporary Foreign Workers with Private Health Care Coverage

While previously a policy, this requirement has now been added to the IRPR, but it only applies to employers of workers under the TFWP. Specifically, employers under the TFWP must obtain and pay for private health insurance that covers emergency medical care for any period during which a temporary foreign worker is not covered by the applicable provincial or territorial health insurance system. Each province and territory has different health care coverage eligibility requirements, so it is important for employers to be aware of these waiting periods and plan accordingly.

As noted, employers of foreign workers under the IMP are not subject to this requirement.

Must not Charge or Recover any Fees or Costs from the Temporary Foreign Worker

While this employer compliance requirement has been a policy in place for quite a while at the federal level and included in some provincial labour standards legislation, it has now been added to the IRPR. This regulation prohibits any employer or any person who recruited the foreign national from directly or indirectly charging that worker, or recovering from that worker, any fees associated with their hiring or recruitment. These fees include fees for LMIA applications, employer compliance fees, and fees related to recruitment. Employers can, however, require their foreign workers to pay the fees related to any temporary visa, temporary resident permit, or work permit applications.

While this has been a long-standing policy and is unlikely to result in any significant adjustments to employer requirements, it is still important to note that this is now included as part of the IRPR.

ESDC and IRCC Granted Authority to Obtain Documents from Third Parties

Lastly, these amendments have also granted authority to IRCC and ESDC to require, without the consent of the employer or worker, that third parties provide any document in their possession that relates to the employer’s compliance with regulatory conditions. While not an employer compliance obligation directly, employers should be aware that the government can obtain documents from third parties such as banks and payroll companies to verify their compliance with their obligations.

Conclusion

The government’s recent amendments to the IRPR have created and extended several employer compliance obligations. The intent of these changes is to protect foreign workers and strengthen the program’s integrity. As a result, employers must now take additional proactive steps to remain compliant.


This update is intended for general information only. If you have further questions about these programs or are an employer seeking to support your workers, please contact a member of our Immigration Group.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

[1] https://canadagazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2022/2022-07-06/html/sor-dors142-eng.html
[2] https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/news/2022/09/new-amendments-to-the-immigration-and-refugee-protection-regulations-temporary-foreign-workers.html

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Bill C-365 calls for plan for implementation of open banking in Canada

November 17, 2023

By Kevin Landry On November 9 2023, Bill C-365, An Act respecting the implementation of a consumer-led banking system for Canadians (“C-365”), short titled as the ‘Consumer-led Banking Act’ was read in the House of…

Read More

More limits: NSCA tightens the test for disallowing a limitations defence

November 15, 2023

By Jennifer Taylor The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal (“NSCA”) has issued an important decision clarifying the test to disallow a limitations defence. The decision, Halifax (Regional Municipality) v Carvery (“Carvery”), has real implications for personal…

Read More

Anticipating changes to the Competition Act: what businesses need to know

November 1, 2023

By Deanne MacLeod, K.C., Burtley Francis & David Slipp On September 21, 2023, the Federal Government introduced Bill C-56: An Act to amend the Excise Tax Act and the Competition Act (“Bill C-56”), with the…

Read More

Powering the future: Green choice program regulations

September 22, 2023

By Nancy Rubin, K.C. and Lauren Agnew The long-awaited Green Choice Program Regulations (N.S. Reg. 155/2023) were released by the provincial government on September 8, 2023, offering some clarity into the practical implementation of Nova…

Read More

Privilege protected: Court of Appeal rules NL’s Information and Privacy Commissioner barred from reviewing solicitor-client privileged information

September 20, 2023

By Koren Thomson, John Samms, and Matthew Raske The Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal has held that the Information and Privacy Commissioner for this province (the “Commissioner”) does not have the authority to order…

Read More

Amendments required for Prince Edward Island code of conduct bylaws

September 18, 2023

By Perlene Morrison, K.C. Municipalities are required to pass code of conduct bylaws in accordance with section 107 of the Municipal Government Act (the “MGA”). Subsection 107(1) of the MGA specifically states that a municipality’s…

Read More

Professionally speaking: Ontario Superior Court upholds professional regulators’ right to moderate speech

September 14, 2023

By Sheila Mecking and Kathleen Starke On August 23, 2023, the Ontario Superior Court (“ONSC”) upheld a complaints decision which ordered a psychologist to complete a continuing education or remedial program regarding professionalism in public…

Read More

One-year reminder for federal employers: Pay equity plans due September 3, 2024

September 5, 2023

By Dante Manna As we advised in a previous podcast, all federal employers with at least ten employees[1] have been subject to the Pay Equity Act [2] (“PEA”) and Pay Equity Regulations [3] (“Regulations”) since…

Read More

Charging to net-zero: Government releases draft Clean Electricity Regulations

August 23, 2023

By Nancy Rubin, K.C. Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) recently published a draft of the Clean Electricity Regulations (CER). The proposed Regulations work toward achieving a net-zero electricity-generating sector, helping Canada become a net-zero…

Read More

Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador rejects developer’s constructive expropriation claim

August 18, 2023

By Stephen Penney & Matthew Raske In the recent decision Index Investment Inc. v. Paradise (Town), 2023 NLSC 112, the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador validated the Town of Paradise’s decision to rezone lands…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top