Skip to Content

Obligations for service providers: New Powers of Attorney and Personal Directives Act

By Zach Geldert

New legislation, the Powers of Attorney and Personal Directives Act, will come into force in Prince Edward Island on November 1, 2025 (the “New Act”). Along with other changes discussed in a previous article, the New Act imposes obligations on third parties who interact with Attorneys (under a power of attorney) and Agents (under a personal directive). Third parties are now expected to confirm the identity of the Attorney or Agent and, to a certain extent, confirm the qualification, in accordance with sections 11 and 25 of the New Act, of the Attorney or Agent to give directions or obtain services.[1]

The New Act imposes obligations on a “service provider”. “Service provider” is defined in the New Act as:

“a person who carries on a business or profession that provides, or is employed to provide, a financial service or personal service, as the case may be”.[2]

“Financial service” is not defined in the New Act. However, the plain meaning of this phrase would likely capture every day services offered by professionals in the legal, accounting, and financial services sectors.

Likewise, a nursing or community care facility would likely be a “service provider” with respect to a “personal service”. A “personal service” is defined in relation to the definition of a “personal matter” which includes:

  • where a person lives, permanently or temporarily;
  • a person’s basic nutrition, clothing and personal care needs; and
  • a person’s social activities.[3]

Corporations and professionals offering services in the above industries should consider how the New Act will impact their interactions with Attorneys and Agents.

The New Act requires a “service provider” to “make a reasonable effort” to verify the identity of the person purporting to act as an Attorney or as an Agent and to confirm the Attorney’s or Agent’s authority to make the decision.[4]

“Reasonable effort” is defined in the New Act with reference to the magnitude of the decision to be made:

“…the reasonable effort required shall be no more onerous than is appropriate to the circumstances and the nature of the decision”.[5]

This definition involves a contextual analysis. It suggests that the level of effort that is required is based on the significance of the decision to be made. For example, a decision to pay a routine bill may require less scrutiny by a “service provider” as compared to a decision that may more significantly impact a principal’s financial or personal wellbeing.

The New Act presents a significant change in the obligations of “service providers”. The previous Powers of Attorney Act,[6] was silent on the requirements for a third party to verify the qualification and identity of an Attorney. As discussed, the New Act states the statutory obligations with which a “service provider” must now comply. Policies and processes of “service providers” may need to change to reflect the new circumstances.

Since the New Act does not offer a more detailed rubric for assessing the circumstances and nature of the decision to be made, it is imperative that “service providers” work with their legal advisors to review and/or develop strong and detailed internal policies to protect against future claims.

This article is for information purposes only. Determining the applicability of the sections of the New Act discussed in this article will require consultation with a lawyer.




Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

[1] Powers of Attorney and Personal Directives Act, R.S.P.E.I. 1988, c. 16.1, ss. 18, 29.
[2] Powers of Attorney and Personal Directives Act, R.S.P.E.I. 1988, c. 16.1, s. 1(1)(s).
[3] Powers of Attorney and Personal Directives Act, R.S.P.E.I. 1988, c. 16.1, s. 1(1)(l).
[4] Powers of Attorney and Personal Directives Act, R.S.P.E.I. 1988, c. 16.1, ss. 18(1), 29(1).
[5] Ibid, ss. 18(2), 29(2).
[6] Powers of Attorney Act, R.S.P.E.I. 1988, c. P-16

Archive

The In-Canada Workers Initiative: Hope and Disappointment

By Brittany Trafford and Brendan Sheridan On May 4, 2026, Canada’s Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship announced further details on the federal government’s one-time initiative to accelerate permanent residence…

Read More

DeVenne v. DeVenne (Part III): Liability and Remedies

BY Tipper McEwan

By Tipper McEwan In Part One of this three-part series on a recent case involving a power of attorney lawsuit in Nova Scotia, DeVenne v. DeVenne, 2026 NSSC 61 (CanLII),…

Read More

DeVenne v. DeVenne (Part II): Breach of Duty

BY Tipper McEwan

By Tipper McEwan This is Part Two of a series discussing a recent case, DeVenne v. DeVenne, 2026 NSSC 61 (CanLII), involving a power of attorney lawsuit in Nova Scotia….

Read More

DeVenne v. DeVenne (Part I): Capacity and Validity

BY Tipper McEwan

By Tipper McEwan The Nova Scotia Supreme Court recently dealt with a case involving the use of a power of attorney in DeVenne v. DeVenne, 2026 NSSC 61 (CanLII).  The…

Read More

Energy Watch 2026

Atlantic Canada’s energy transition is gaining real momentum. From large-scale wind projects and hydrogen development to new regulatory frameworks and grid investments, each province is playing a distinct role in…

Read More

Confirming the coverage analysis: Emond v Trillium Mutual Insurance Co.

By Tipper McEwan, Shelley Wood, K.C., and Jennifer Taylor In an important case for property insurers and their counsel, the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) recently reviewed the principles of…

Read More

Changes and restrictions to New Brunswick’s Atlantic Immigration Program

BY Chiara Nannucci

By Chiara Nannucci New Brunswick has introduced several updates and restrictions to applications under the Atlantic Immigration Program (“AIP”), effective February 3, 2026. These changes affect employers’ participation, applicants’ eligibility,…

Read More

Canada’s new Defence Industrial Strategy

BY Erin Best (she/her) & Robert Bradley

By Erin Best & Robert Bradley On February 17, 2026, the Government of Canada released its Defence Industrial Strategy (the “Strategy”). This follows a series of announcements highlighting the Government’s…

Read More

Timing is not everything – Alberta Human Rights Tribunal finds that termination during medical leave did not amount to discrimination

BY Jacob Zelman

By Jacob Zelman An employer has succeeded before Alberta’s Human Rights Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) in a case arising from the termination of an employee shortly after he requested medical leave,…

Read More

Outlook for 2026 proxy season

BY Andrew Burke & Colleen Keyes, K.C. & David Slipp

By Andrew V. Burke, Colleen P. Keyes, David F. Slipp and Logan G. Walters With proxy season on the horizon, many public companies are once again preparing their annual disclosure documents and shareholder materials for…

Read More

Search Archive