Skip to content

Nova Scotia to limit medical notes for employee absences

This article was updated on April 19, 2023.


By Mark Tector and Ben Currie

On April 12, 2023 Bill 256: Patient Access to Care Act received Royal Assent. Schedule B of the Bill is the Medical Certificates for Employee Absence Act (“Act”), which will take effect on July 1, 2023. The Act prevents a provincially regulated employer in Nova Scotia from requesting a certificate (i.e. medical note) from an employee related to the employee’s absence from work due to sickness or injury unless one of the following conditions are met:

  1. The absence continues for more than five consecutive working days; or
  2. The employee has had at least two non-consecutive absences of five or fewer working days due to sickness or injury in the prior 12-months.

Despite the name of the Act, the certificate can come from a “qualified health professional” who is providing a diagnosis, treatment or care to the employee with respect to the illness or injury causing the employee’s absence. This includes not only physicians, but any person who holds a license to practice a regulated health profession in Nova Scotia. The qualified health professional must be acting within their scope of practice when issuing the certificate.

Nova Scotia joins the remaining Atlantic provinces, which, through employment standards legislation, restrict the ability of provincially regulated employers from requesting a certificate as follows:

  • New Brunswick: If the employee’s absence is four or more consecutive days, the employer can request a certificate from a physician, nurse practitioner, or midwife.
  • Prince Edward Island: If the employee’s absence is three or more consecutive days, the employer can request a certificate from a physician.
  • Newfoundland and Labrador: If the employee’s absence is three or more consecutive days, the employee shall provide a certificate from a physician or nurse practitioner. This puts the obligation on the employee; however, practically employers may choose to waive the requirement depending on the circumstances.

Nova Scotia’s proposed Act differs from the legislation in the remaining Atlantic provinces in two important ways:

  1. It allows for a second condition whereby the employer may request a certificate for two non-consecutive absences of five or fewer working days within the prior 12-months; and
  2. It allows any regulated health professional in Nova Scotia to issue the certificate, provided they are operating within their scope of practice and treating the employee. This is much broader than the other Atlantic provinces which require the certificate to come from a physician, and in some Atlantic provinces a nurse practitioner or midwife.

This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Labour & Employment group.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Prince Edward Island adopts new Municipal Government Act

December 22, 2016

Perlene Morrison Prince Edward Island’s municipal legislation is being modernized with the implementation of the Municipal Government Act (the “MGA”). The legislation has now received royal assent and will be proclaimed in force at a future date.…

Read More

Land Use Planning in Prince Edward Island: The Year in Review

December 20, 2016

Jonathan Coady and Chera-Lee Gomez It’s that time of year – the moment when we look back at the year that was and chart our course for the year ahead. For many councillors, administrators and planning professionals…

Read More

The Latest in Labour Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Onsite OHS liability: Who is (and who is not) the true constructor?

December 15, 2016

Peter McLellan, QC and Michelle Black In a recent decision, R v McCarthy’s Roofing Limited, Judge Anne Derrick provided some much-needed clarity around what it means to be a “constructor” on a job site. This is critical as…

Read More

Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?

December 15, 2016

Rick Dunlop On December 13, 2016, the Government of Canada released A Framework for the Legalization and Regulation of Cannabis in Canada: The Final Report of the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation (“Report”). The Report’s…

Read More

Canadian employers facing marijuana challenges in the workplace

November 25, 2016

Brian Johnston, QC Canadian employers are already coping with approximately 75,000 Canadians authorized to use medical marijuana. Health Canada expects that this number will increase to about 450,000 by 2024. Employers know that medical marijuana…

Read More

You’ve got mail – Ontario Court of Appeal sends a constitutional message to municipalities about community mailboxes

October 28, 2016

Jonathan Coady With its decision in Canada Post Corporation v. City of Hamilton,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal has confirmed that the placement of community mailboxes by Canada Post is a matter beyond the reach of municipalities…

Read More

A window on interpreting insurance contracts: Top 10 points from Ledcor Construction

September 23, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Thanks to some dirty windows, insurance lawyers have a new go-to Supreme Court case on issues of policy interpretation: Ledcor Construction Ltd v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co, 2016 SCC 37. The insurers in Ledcor Construction had…

Read More

Charter-ing a Different Course? Two decisions on TWU’s proposed law school

August 11, 2016

Jennifer Taylor Introduction Appeal courts in Ontario1 and Nova Scotia2 have now issued decisions about Trinity Western University’s proposed law school (“TWU”) in British Columbia, and at first glance they couldn’t be more different. The Court of Appeal for…

Read More

Restart the Clock!: Confirmation and resetting limitation periods in Tuck v. Supreme Holdings, 2016 NLCA 40

August 11, 2016

Joe Thorne1 and Giles Ayers2 Limitation periods serve a critical function in the civil justice system. They promote the timely resolution of litigation on the basis of reliable evidence, and permit litigants to assess their legal exposure…

Read More

Client Update: SCC issues major decision affecting federal employers: Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited

July 15, 2016

On July 14, 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada issued a significant decision affecting federally regulated employers across Canada. In Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited the Court held that the purpose of the unjust dismissal…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top