Skip to content

Nova Scotia to limit medical notes for employee absences

This article was updated on April 19, 2023.


By Mark Tector and Ben Currie

On April 12, 2023 Bill 256: Patient Access to Care Act received Royal Assent. Schedule B of the Bill is the Medical Certificates for Employee Absence Act (“Act”), which will take effect on July 1, 2023. The Act prevents a provincially regulated employer in Nova Scotia from requesting a certificate (i.e. medical note) from an employee related to the employee’s absence from work due to sickness or injury unless one of the following conditions are met:

  1. The absence continues for more than five consecutive working days; or
  2. The employee has had at least two non-consecutive absences of five or fewer working days due to sickness or injury in the prior 12-months.

Despite the name of the Act, the certificate can come from a “qualified health professional” who is providing a diagnosis, treatment or care to the employee with respect to the illness or injury causing the employee’s absence. This includes not only physicians, but any person who holds a license to practice a regulated health profession in Nova Scotia. The qualified health professional must be acting within their scope of practice when issuing the certificate.

Nova Scotia joins the remaining Atlantic provinces, which, through employment standards legislation, restrict the ability of provincially regulated employers from requesting a certificate as follows:

  • New Brunswick: If the employee’s absence is four or more consecutive days, the employer can request a certificate from a physician, nurse practitioner, or midwife.
  • Prince Edward Island: If the employee’s absence is three or more consecutive days, the employer can request a certificate from a physician.
  • Newfoundland and Labrador: If the employee’s absence is three or more consecutive days, the employee shall provide a certificate from a physician or nurse practitioner. This puts the obligation on the employee; however, practically employers may choose to waive the requirement depending on the circumstances.

Nova Scotia’s proposed Act differs from the legislation in the remaining Atlantic provinces in two important ways:

  1. It allows for a second condition whereby the employer may request a certificate for two non-consecutive absences of five or fewer working days within the prior 12-months; and
  2. It allows any regulated health professional in Nova Scotia to issue the certificate, provided they are operating within their scope of practice and treating the employee. This is much broader than the other Atlantic provinces which require the certificate to come from a physician, and in some Atlantic provinces a nurse practitioner or midwife.

This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Labour & Employment group.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Client Update: “Lien”-ing Towards Efficiency: Upcoming Amendments to the Builders’ Lien Act

June 29, 2017

By Brian Tabor, QC and Colin Piercey Bill 81 and Bill 15, receiving Royal Assent in 2013 and 2014 respectively, are due to take effect this month. On June 30, 2017, amendments to the Builders’…

Read More

Weeding Through New Brunswick’s Latest Cannabis Recommendations

June 26, 2017

New Brunswick continues to be a thought leader in the field of regulation of recreational cannabis and provides us with a first look at what the provincial regulation of recreational cannabis might look like. New…

Read More

Client Update: Elk Valley Decision – SCC Finds that Enforcement of “No Free Accident” Rule in Workplace Drug and Alcohol Policy Does Not Violate Human Rights Legislation

June 23, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Richard Jordan In Stewart v. Elk Valley Coal Corporation, 2017 SCC 30, a six-judge majority of the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) confirmed a Tribunal decision which concluded that the dismissal of an…

Read More

Client Update: The Grass is Always Greener in the Other Jurisdiction – Provincial Acts and Regulations under the Cannabis Act

June 22, 2017

By Kevin Landry New Brunswick’s Working Group on the Legalization of Cannabis released an interim report on June 20, 2017. It is a huge step forward in the legalization process and the first official look at how legalization…

Read More

Client Update: Cannabis Act regulations – now we are really getting into the weeds!

June 15, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Kevin Landry As we explained in The Cannabis Act- Getting into the Weeds, the Cannabis Act introduces a regulatory regime for recreational marijuana in Canada. The regime promises to be complex. The details of legalization will be…

Read More

Client Update: Requirement to register as a lobbyist in New Brunswick

June 15, 2017

On April 1, 2017, the New Brunswick Lobbyists’ Registration Act was proclaimed into force (the “Act”), requiring active professional consultant or in-house lobbyists to register and file returns with the Office of the Integrity Commissioner of New…

Read More

How much is too much?: Disclosure in multiple accident litigation in English v House, 2017 NLTD(G) 93

June 14, 2017

Joe Thorne and Jessica Habet How far can an insurer dig into the Plaintiff’s history to defend a claim? And how much information is an insurer entitled to have in order to do so? In English v.…

Read More

Client Update: Court of Appeal confirms accounting firms may take on multiple mandates for the same company

June 14, 2017

Neil Jacobs, QC, Joe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal recently confirmed that accounting/auditing firms may take on several mandates in respect of companies that may or do become insolvent in Wabush Hotel Limited…

Read More

Negligence claims in paper-only independent medical examinations: Rubens v Sansome, 2017 NLCA 32

June 13, 2017

Joe Thorne and Brandon Gillespie An independent medical examination (“IME”) is a useful tool for insurers. An IME is an objective assessment of the claimant’s condition for the purpose of evaluating coverage and compensation. Where a…

Read More

Client Update: Mental injury? Expert diagnosis not required

June 12, 2017

On June 2, 2017 the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, clarifying the evidence needed to establish mental injury. Neither expert evidence nor a diagnosed psychiatric illness…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top