Skip to Content

Nova Scotia Court upholds executor’s discretion to refuse an interim distribution from an estate

By Tipper McEwan

In a first for Nova Scotia, Foster Estate gives guidance on when the Court will, or will not, order an executor to make an interim distribution from an estate. 

A key take away is that the Court will not interfere with an executor’s discretion if it is exercised reasonably.

In Foster Estate v. Foster, 2025 NSSC 317 the Nova Scotia Probate Court heard an application for an interim distribution from an estate. The beneficiaries under the will were three siblings, one of whom was the executor. The executor had made interim distributions of $150,000 to each beneficiary in August 2024 and $50,000 in January 2025. The two other beneficiaries filed an application with the Court seeking a further interim distribution of $75,000. 

The Court ruled that it had the power to order an interim distribution under Section 8(1)(c) of the Probate Act, which gave the Court the power to “hear and determine all questions, matters and things in relation thereto necessary for” the judicial administration of the estates. 

The will gave the executor absolute discretion on the timing of the distribution of the estate’s assets. The Court ruled that it could only intervene with the executor’s discretion if:

  • the executor’s decision was so unreasonable that no honest or fair-dealing trustee could have come to that decision;
  • the executor considered matters which were irrelevant to the discretionary decision; or
  • the executor did nothing and could not show that he properly considered the exercise of the discretion granted by the will.

The Court held that the executor had exercised his discretion in making the two earlier interim distributions. The Court also considered these factors:

  • neither of the other beneficiaries had shown that they needed the money;
  • the time between the grant of probate and the application to pass accounts;
  • that the application to pass accounts was only five weeks away;
  • how much would remain in the estate; and
  • the estate’s potential expenses in the ongoing litigation over the executor’s accounts.

Considering all of these factors the Court dismissed the motion for a further interim distribution.

The full text of this case can be found here: Foster Estate v. Foster, 2025 NSSC 317 (CanLII).


This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact the author, Tipper McEwan. Tipper is a partner in Stewart McKelvey’s advocacy group who practices in the areas of estate litigation, insurance, and commercial litigation.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

Archive

Early court decisions on generative AI: What Canadian businesses need to know

BY Matthew N. Craig

Matthew N. Craig and Sam Schonfeld Regardless of which industry you are a part of, you have likely noticed the adoption of generative artificial intelligence (“GenAI”) all around you. Increasingly,…

Read More

Government of Canada introduces Protecting Privacy and Consumer Data Act

Sarah Dever Letson, CIPP/C, Maria Cummings, and Keeley A. Hussey On June 15, 2026, Bill C-36, An Act to enact the Protecting Privacy and Consumer Data Act, to amend the…

Read More

PEI’s new Employment Standards Act is now in force: What employers need to do now

Murray L. Murphy, K.C., CPHR and Jacob E. Zelman In our earlier update issued in March 2025 (At a glance: Key changes coming to Prince Edward Island’s Employment Standards Act), we flagged…

Read More

More health profession migrations: An update on Nova Scotia’s Regulated Health Professions Act

BY Tyana R. Caplan & Jennifer Taylor

By Tyana Caplan & Jennifer Taylor The midpoint of 2026 provides a timely opportunity to review which health professions in Nova Scotia have now migrated to the Regulated Health Professions…

Read More

A reason to reconsider probate planning in New Brunswick

By Christopher Marr, TEP, Partner with assistance from Brady McKinley, student-at-law Significant increase to New Brunswick probate tax and fees Effective as of June 12, 2026, probate fees and taxes have significantly increased…

Read More

Coverage – Policy Interpretation – Causation

BY Tipper McEwan

By Tipper McEwan In Green Rise Foods Inc. v. N.V. Hagelunie, 2026 ONCA 334 (CanLII),the Court of Appeal for Ontario considered a case involving a series of potential causes for…

Read More

Back to the office? Not without notice: BC Court of Appeal confirms work-from-home can be a binding term of employment

BY Sacha Morisset, K.C.

By Sacha D. Morisset, K.C. The British Columbia Court of Appeal has upheld a finding of constructive dismissal against a Vancouver real estate developer that directed a longtime remote employee…

Read More

The In-Canada Workers Initiative: Hope and Disappointment

By Brittany Trafford and Brendan Sheridan On May 4, 2026, Canada’s Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship announced further details on the federal government’s one-time initiative to accelerate permanent residence…

Read More

DeVenne v. DeVenne (Part III): Liability and Remedies

BY Tipper McEwan

By Tipper McEwan In Part One of this three-part series on a recent case involving a power of attorney lawsuit in Nova Scotia, DeVenne v. DeVenne, 2026 NSSC 61 (CanLII),…

Read More

DeVenne v. DeVenne (Part II): Breach of Duty

BY Tipper McEwan

By Tipper McEwan This is Part Two of a series discussing a recent case, DeVenne v. DeVenne, 2026 NSSC 61 (CanLII), involving a power of attorney lawsuit in Nova Scotia….

Read More

Search Archive