New trust reporting and disclosure requirements under the Income Tax Act
2021: The Year of the Overshare
Governments around the world are taking steps to increase transparency at the expense of privacy. In Canada, federal government strategies to combat money laundering and tax evasion coming into effect in 2021 will have a significant impact on trusts and their historically “private” nature. Budget 2018 – Equality and Growth for a Strong Middle Class, announced on February 27, 2018, proposes that trusts in existence during any part of 2021 will be subject to a series of requirements relating to reporting and disclosure under the Income Tax Act (Canada).
Specifically, if brought into force as expected, these changes will require trustees to significantly increase the amount of information disclosed to Canada Revenue Agency, and to file a T3 Trust Income Tax and Information Return (“T3 Return”) for each year in existence going forward, whether or not income is earned within the trust. With the 2021 taxation year beginning in a short few weeks, we provide this reminder of the upcoming changes, and encourage trustees to contact their lawyer or tax preparer to discuss the impact on any existing trust arrangements that might be in place.
Disclosing this level of information may have significant impact on an estate plan – the information discussed below must be collected from all beneficiaries, as well as those individuals involved in the settlement, management, and administration of the trust. This may come as a surprise to persons involved with discretionary family trusts settled several years ago without much activity since settlement. The rules also apply to testamentary trusts, estates that are not graduated rate estates, and other types of inter vivos trusts.
If a trust is in existence at some point during 2021, as mentioned above, these new requirements must be met in 2022 when the T3 Return is due (even if the trust is wound up on January 2, 2021!). It is thus crucial that trustees consider the new rules, and determine whether action is required to mitigate the impact of these changes, in advance of that date. There are exceptions to this, noted below, which include trusts that have been in existence for less than three months at the end of 2021.
New filing requirements
Trustees of trusts created during an estate freeze, or designed to hold specific property, may have never filed T3 Returns if the trust has not earned any income since its settlement. After 2021, express trusts resident in Canada and non-resident trusts will be required to file a T3 Return, regardless of whether income is earned.
This new requirement goes hand-in-hand with the new information disclosure requirements, as it implements a yearly update for the government as to property held by trusts, and for whom, even if those trusts are largely dormant.
New information disclosure requirements
For trusts in existence during any part of the 2021 taxation year, information must be collected on the following persons:
- trustee(s) of the trust;
- beneficiary(ies) (including contingent beneficiaries, or corporations or trusts which are current or potential beneficiaries);
- the settlor of, or any other contributor to, the trust; and
- any person able to exert control over a trustee’s decisions (i.e. a protector).
That information for each person includes:
- legal name;
- date of birth (for individuals);
- jurisdiction of residence; and
- tax identification number (Canadian or foreign).
Trustees will need to work with their tax preparers to collect, store, and manage this information in order to facilitate tax filing in 2022. This information will have to be filed as a schedule to the T3 Return filed in 2022 for the 2021 taxation year, and not separately.
Consequences of failing to meet requirements
If the trustees of a trust that is required to file a T3 Return after 2021 fail to do so, or fail to provide the additional information needed by these new requirements, they will be subject to a penalty. The penalty will be equal to $25 per day of delinquency, with a minimum penalty of $100 and a maximum penalty of $2,500.
If the failure was made knowingly, or due to gross negligence, a penalty of 5% of the maximum value of the property held during the relevant tax year by the trust will be applied. This additional penalty will be a minimum of $2,500, and will be in addition to existing penalties with respect to T3 Returns. This could be very significant if the trust holds valuable assets.
As an example, if your cottage property or common shares of your private company are held in a trust and are worth $500,000, the penalty for knowingly failing to remit a T3 Return, or submit all of the information required for all involved individuals, would be $25,000 (over and above any other penalties which may also apply to that trust).
Exclusions from new requirements
The following types of trusts will not be subject to the updated requirements:
- mutual fund trusts, segregated funds and master trusts;
- trusts governed by registered plans (i.e., deferred profit sharing plans; pooled registered pension plans; registered disability savings plans; registered education savings plans; registered pension plans; registered retirement income funds; registered retirement savings plans; registered supplementary unemployment benefit plans; and tax free savings accounts);
- lawyers’ general trust accounts;
- graduated rate estates and qualified disability trusts;
- trusts that qualify as non-profit organizations or registered charities;
- trusts that have been in existence for less than three months; and
- trusts that hold less than $50,000 throughout the taxation year, if the holdings are limited to bank deposits, government debt obligations, or listed securities only.
Do you have an existing trust which no longer serves a purpose?
If you are the trustee of a trust which no longer serves a purpose within your or someone else’s estate plan, or is sitting empty, we recommend contacting our Estates & Trusts group to discuss next steps. We may be able to effect wind-ups of trusts no longer serving a purpose, to avoid having to file under these new regulations in 2022. Examples of a trust “no longer serving a purpose” include trusts holding property no longer qualifying for the principal residence exemption, trusts created for income splitting with a spouse or others prior to the expansion of the tax on split income rules, or testamentary trusts no longer receiving graduated rates. If any of these circumstances apply, or you have questions about specific trusts within an estate plan, please contact us for advice.
It will be important for trustees to collaborate with their tax preparers and legal counsel to ensure they do not run into challenges with respect to these trusts during the 2021 taxation year. In particular, we encourage trustees to reach out to their tax preparers to determine how the new information will be collected over the coming months.
For those considering incorporating trust structures into their estate plan, these changes add a layer of complexity, depending on the circumstances. For many, these changes may not be of great consequence, particularly for those who envision a small group of related beneficiaries from whom collecting this information will not pose a great challenge. The benefit of knowing these rules prior to settling a trust is being able to collect this information at the outset, as opposed to seeking out settlors from years ago to retrieve their social insurance number.
Until the regulations are finalized, it is unclear how these rules will apply to disclosing information about settlors who are deceased, or classes of beneficiaries not yet in existence. We will keep our clients apprised of updates.
This article is provided for general information only. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Estates & Trusts group.
Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership articles and updates.
Dante Manna As of today, Newfoundland and Labrador has joined several other jurisdictions with financial hardship unlocking provisions. While the new provisions do not allow direct unlocking from pension plans, and unlocking is not available…Read More
Nancy Rubin, QC Nova Scotia has taken a big step forward in recognizing the tort of publication of private facts. The case, Racki v Racki, 2021 NSSC 46 comes hot on the heels of Ontario’s…Read More
Kathleen Leighton Canada is committed to developing Francophone minority communities in the country (outside of Quebec). In furtherance of this goal, there are a number of immigration initiatives in place to attract French speakers. By…Read More
Chad Sullivan and Kathleen Nash Overview The issue of hateful and harassing social media communication has garnered much attention in both the media and, more recently, in the courtroom. In Caplan v Atas,¹ Justice Corbett…Read More
Daniel MacKenzie and James Galsworthy On January 15, 2021, the United Kingdom’s Supreme Court (“Court”) issued a decision which is likely to be viewed as good news for policy holders who have endured business interruption…Read More