Skip to Content

New rules allowing Nova Scotia private sector employers to join Public Service Superannuation Plan take effect

By Dante Manna and Noah Archibald

The Provincial Government recently proclaimed the Private Sector Pension Plan Transfer Act (the “Transfer Act”) and newly released regulations on February 4, 2025. The Private Sector Pension Plan Transfer Regulations (the “Regulations”) further detail how private employers can transfer private sector pension plans to the Nova Scotia Public Service Superannuation Plan (the “Plan” or “PSSP”). We previously provided an overview of the Transfer Act in our earlier update, Nova Scotia offers new pension option to private sector employers.

With these developments, private sector employers now have access to a defined benefit pension plan option. This option uses a prescribed funding policy and an employer’s responsibilities are limited to those required by the Plan, which is administered by a non-profit corporation with pension expertise.

With the Transfer Act proclaimed, the PSSP is now available to employers in the private sector. Previously, the Plan was restricted to only certain employers, including Nova Scotia universities, municipalities, and public-sector employers. Private sector employers can now participate in the PSSP.

The Transfer Act sets out the process for transferring an existing pension plan into the PSSP. Employers can transfer assets and liabilities from private sector plans or may join the PSSP on a go-forward basis. To transfer an existing plan to PSSP, there are additional formalizing agreements and steps to consider, which include (1) a transfer agreement between the PSSP trustee and the transferring employer, (2) approval by the Superintendent of Pensions, (3) notice to and a vote by members, and (4) potentially a group agreement with a union or employee association.

If a new private sector employer wishes to apply to join the PSSP on a go-forward basis only, the Transfer Act process is not necessary.

The Regulations set out in greater detail the process for approving the transfer of a private-sector employer pension plan into the Plan. In particular, pension transfers must be completed within 120 days of the Superintendent of Pensions consenting to a transfer to the PSSP. Filings relating to the transfer are required within 210 days after the transfer was completed. The Superintendent of Pensions has discretion to extend these time limits, upon written request.

The Regulations also set out conditions under which the Superintendent of Pensions will consent to a transfer into the PSSP:

  • The transferring employer has made reasonable efforts to provide notice to (i) members eligible for benefits under the transferring plan, and (ii) any union or advisory committee that represents them.
  • A vote of active members, and a vote of deferred members, retirees and other beneficiaries under the transferring plan, were held and no more that 1/3 of the group objected in either vote.
  • The transferring employer has provided the Superintendent of Pensions with all information regarding the transfer required by the Regulations.
  • Pension entitlements of each individual transferring non-retired or retired member under the PSSP are no less than their pension entitlements under the transferring pension plan.
  • If a transfer or partial transfer is made from a defined benefit plan, the transfer ratio of that plan on the transfer date is no less than what it would have been on that date if the transfer had not occurred.

The Regulations set out in detail the content that employers must provide as notice to members eligible for benefits and to any union or advisory committee that represents them. Unions representing current members of a plan may vote on their behalf in this process.

The above procedures loosely correlate to those applicable to transfers between private sector plans under the Pension Benefits Regulations.

The PSSP Plan Text was also amended in December 2024, including the addition of new section 11 (“Private Sector Employers”) which came into force as of proclamation.  This section addresses the terms and conditions of participation particular to private sector employers, including a requirement to post a bond guaranteeing payment of the total estimated contributions by the employer and its employees for a minimum of 4 biweekly pay periods.  The PSSP Administrator is required to realize the bond in certain circumstances of failure to remit contributions, and to suspend accrual of pensionable service until the employer is compliant and replenishes the bond.

The PSSP Plan Text amendments are also consistent with the PSSP VANTAGE program announced in September 2024. To enable broader participation in the PSSP, this program allows employers to participate at reduced contribution rates, which correspond to equivalent pension accrual rates. Employers can participate with contribution and benefit accrual rates which are 80 percent or 60 percent of the standard rates. 

According to the amended PSSP Plan Text, the lowest such contribution rates (corresponding to 60 percent participation level) are currently:  5.04% of salary up to the year’s maximum pensionable earnings (“YMPE”), and 6.54% above YMPE.  The Plan Text permits an employer to enrol different employee groups at different participation levels, or the same employee may be enrolled at different participation levels at different times.

As a result, use of the PSSP may be of value to employers who wish to offer, or continue to offer, a defined benefit pension plan for employees while controlling cost.  Although defined contribution pension plans have become increasingly popular, use of the PSSP provides an additional option, of a defined benefit pension benefit with potential for indexing, to employers that decide to pursue this process.

Please contact the authors for additional guidance on the new options available to private sector employers.


This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact the authors, or a member of our Pensions and Benefits Group.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

Archive

Employment law insights from Gbongbor v Multicultural Association of Fredericton

By Clarence Bennett, K.C., ICD.D, Mark Heighton, and Emma-Jean Griffin The recent decision in Gbongbor v Multicultural Association of Fredericton (“Gbongbor”)[1] from the New Brunswick Court of King’s Bench offered…

Read More

Lawrence Estate (Part I): When is a gift a gift?

BY Tipper McEwan

By Tipper McEwan The Nova Scotia Supreme Court recently heard a case that involved a gift from a parent to an adult child in Lawrence Estate v. Lawrence, 2025 NSSC…

Read More

Making 2025 changes real in 2026: A practical guide for employers

BY John Morse & Emma Jean Griffin

By John Morse and Emma Jean Griffin 2025 brought significant changes to Canadian workplace law, with courts and legislators prioritizing fairness, safety, and accountability. Employers now face new obligations around…

Read More

Nova Scotia Court upholds executor’s discretion to refuse an interim distribution from an estate

BY Tipper McEwan

By Tipper McEwan In a first for Nova Scotia, Foster Estate gives guidance on when the Court will, or will not, order an executor to make an interim distribution from…

Read More

Overview of labour and employment implications of the proposed Federal Budget 2025 – the “Canada Strong Budget”

BY Marina Luro & Sophie Poulos

By Marina Luro and Sophie Poulos Introduction The Canadian government has recently tabled their “Canada Strong Budget 2025” (Budget 2025)[1] – an ambitious plan to increase efficiency and cut “wasteful spending”. In large part,…

Read More

Lost in the weeds: Drafting clarity, fire losses, and marijuana exclusion clauses

BY Tipper McEwan

By Tipper McEwan The British Columbia Court of Appeal recently dealt with a marijuana exclusion in Busato v. Gore Mutual Insurance Company, 2025 BCCA 79.  Mr. Busato had a license…

Read More

Proceed with caution: Supreme Court confirms framework for assessing “Material Changes” requiring timely disclosure in Lundin Mining Corp. v Markowich

By Andrew V. Burke, Jason W.J. Woycheshyn, David F. Slipp, and Noah Archibald Take note all public companies – not all operational surprises can be quietly managed. The Supreme Court…

Read More

Building Canada Act – An Act respecting national interest projects

BY Kim Walsh & Michael O'Keefe

By Kim Walsh and Michael O’Keefe Overview The Government of Canada introduced Bill C-5, the One Canadian Economy Act, just over one month after the 2025 federal election. With Bill…

Read More

Concurrent jurisdiction: New Brunswick Court clarifies intersection of labour and human rights disputes

BY Sheila Mecking & John Morse

By Sheila Mecking and John Morse Historically, unions and employees in New Brunswick have sought to enforce an employee’s human rights through both grievance arbitration and by filing complaints with…

Read More

Canada’s 2025–2027 Immigration Plan: Initial impacts

BY Chiara Nannucci

By Chiara Nannucci On October 21, 2025, the Government of Canada released a report[1] evaluating the effectiveness of its 2025-2027 Immigration Levels Plan (the “2025 Plan”).[2] The 2025 Plan was…

Read More

Search Archive