Skip to Content

More health profession migrations: An update on Nova Scotia’s Regulated Health Professions Act

By Tyana Caplan & Jennifer Taylor

The midpoint of 2026 provides a timely opportunity to review which health professions in Nova Scotia have now migrated to the Regulated Health Professions Act (“RHPA”) regime.

This update follows our original overview of the RHPA from January 6, 2025, and our 2025 mid-year review, both of which are available here.

By way of background, the RHPA is a Nova Scotia statute establishing a shared regulatory framework that will eventually apply to all health professions and health professionals in Nova Scotia. Since the RHPA was enacted in 2023, health professions have been transitioning to the new regime in phases. The migration is expected to be complete within the next year.

One key change is that regulators formerly known as “Colleges” (or, sometimes, “boards” or “councils”) will, once migrated, be called “Regulators.” Beyond the title change, migration to the RHPA regime will mean new bylaws, regulations, and committee names and processes for each health profession, as well as the potential for increased ministerial oversight. These changes will affect regulators and regulated health professionals alike, touching everything from day-to-day governance to registration, licensing, and reinstatement; complaints and professional conduct (disciplinary) procedures; and fitness-to-practice programs.

Nursing and midwifery are the latest professions to migrate, as of June 30, 2026. Midwives and nurses (including Licensed Practical Nurses, Nurse Practitioners, Registered Nurses, and Registered Psychiatric Nurses) are now regulated by the same regulatory body, the Nova Scotia Nursing and Midwifery Regulator, and are subject to the new Nursing and Midwifery Regulations.

The following professionals had previously migrated to the new regime:

Migration is expected later in 2026, or early in 2027, for:

  • Counselling Therapists;
  • Dispensing Opticians and Optometrists;
  • Physicians, Surgeons, and Podiatrists; and
  • Social Workers (the most recent professionals to be made subject to the RHPA).

This update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific guidance on how the Regulated Health Professions Act may affect you or your organization, please contact the authors, or a member of our Health Group.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

Archive

Early court decisions on generative AI: What Canadian businesses need to know

BY Matthew N. Craig

Matthew N. Craig and Sam Schonfeld Regardless of which industry you are a part of, you have likely noticed the adoption of generative artificial intelligence (“GenAI”) all around you. Increasingly,…

Read More

Government of Canada introduces Protecting Privacy and Consumer Data Act

Sarah Dever Letson, CIPP/C, Maria Cummings, and Keeley A. Hussey On June 15, 2026, Bill C-36, An Act to enact the Protecting Privacy and Consumer Data Act, to amend the…

Read More

PEI’s new Employment Standards Act is now in force: What employers need to do now

Murray L. Murphy, K.C., CPHR and Jacob E. Zelman In our earlier update issued in March 2025 (At a glance: Key changes coming to Prince Edward Island’s Employment Standards Act), we flagged…

Read More

More health profession migrations: An update on Nova Scotia’s Regulated Health Professions Act

BY Tyana R. Caplan & Jennifer Taylor

By Tyana Caplan & Jennifer Taylor The midpoint of 2026 provides a timely opportunity to review which health professions in Nova Scotia have now migrated to the Regulated Health Professions…

Read More

A reason to reconsider probate planning in New Brunswick

By Christopher Marr, TEP, Partner with assistance from Brady McKinley, student-at-law Significant increase to New Brunswick probate tax and fees Effective as of June 12, 2026, probate fees and taxes have significantly increased…

Read More

Coverage – Policy Interpretation – Causation

BY Tipper McEwan

By Tipper McEwan In Green Rise Foods Inc. v. N.V. Hagelunie, 2026 ONCA 334 (CanLII),the Court of Appeal for Ontario considered a case involving a series of potential causes for…

Read More

Back to the office? Not without notice: BC Court of Appeal confirms work-from-home can be a binding term of employment

BY Sacha Morisset, K.C.

By Sacha D. Morisset, K.C. The British Columbia Court of Appeal has upheld a finding of constructive dismissal against a Vancouver real estate developer that directed a longtime remote employee…

Read More

The In-Canada Workers Initiative: Hope and Disappointment

By Brittany Trafford and Brendan Sheridan On May 4, 2026, Canada’s Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship announced further details on the federal government’s one-time initiative to accelerate permanent residence…

Read More

DeVenne v. DeVenne (Part III): Liability and Remedies

BY Tipper McEwan

By Tipper McEwan In Part One of this three-part series on a recent case involving a power of attorney lawsuit in Nova Scotia, DeVenne v. DeVenne, 2026 NSSC 61 (CanLII),…

Read More

DeVenne v. DeVenne (Part II): Breach of Duty

BY Tipper McEwan

By Tipper McEwan This is Part Two of a series discussing a recent case, DeVenne v. DeVenne, 2026 NSSC 61 (CanLII), involving a power of attorney lawsuit in Nova Scotia….

Read More

Search Archive