Skip to Content

COVID-19 vaccination soon to become mandatory in all federally regulated workplaces in Canada

Brian Johnston, QC and Katharine Mack

COVID-19 vaccination policies have become more prevalent. Public sector employees have been mandated to get vaccinated in a number of jurisdictions, the federal government has mandated vaccinations in the marine and transportation industries, and some provincial governments have required vaccination in other high-risk sectors such as healthcare. Additionally, many private sector employers have voluntarily established vaccination requirements for employees and patrons.

Most recently, the federal government announced that it is developing COVID-19 Vaccination Regulations under the Canada Labour Code, which would come into effect in early 2022. The regulations would require that employees be vaccinated across all federally regulated industries, including banking, broadcasting and telecommunications. Indigenous Governing Bodies and First Nation Band Councils will be exempt in recognition of the right to self-determination and self-government.

If enacted as announced, the COVID-19 Vaccination Regulations will require that federally regulated employers verify vaccination status of all employees – affecting approximately 955,000 employees across Canada. Exemptions would be available to employees for reasons protected by the Canadian Human Rights Act. Employers who do not comply with the vaccination requirement could be subject to administrative monetary penalties.

Last week, there were a few days of consultations with select federal employers and associations. As well a consultation paper has been released.

Concerns have been expressed with this federal initiative including the expected negative impact on industries where labour is already in short supply (e.g. transportation). Some have suggested the Saskatchewan approach as an alternative where employers have the option but are not required to implement mandatory vaccinations. In Saskatchewan, for those employers who opt to implement a policy, legislation and regulations broadly backstops them so long as their actions in implementing and administering the mandatory vaccination policies and other measures are carried out in good faith, whether reasonable or not.

Concerns have also been raised with respect to lack of meaningful engagement, guidance and clarity from the federal government. For example, there have been ongoing challenges for employers in navigating exemption requests on the basis of human rights grounds including disability and religion. While these issues are complex and sometimes emotional, federal employers have been left to respond to these requests in the absence of meaningful guidance from the government nor any promise of a legal backstop to protect employers from legal challenges where they have acted in good faith.

If you have questions, or would like to implement a vaccination policy tailored to your organization, please reach out to a member of our Labour and Employment Group for assistance.


This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Labour and Employment group.

 

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

Archive

DeVenne v. DeVenne (Part II): Breach of Duty

BY Tipper McEwan

By Tipper McEwan This is Part Two of a series discussing a recent case, DeVenne v. DeVenne, 2026 NSSC 61 (CanLII), involving a power of attorney lawsuit in Nova Scotia….

Read More

DeVenne v. DeVenne (Part I): Capacity and Validity

BY Tipper McEwan

By Tipper McEwan The Nova Scotia Supreme Court recently dealt with a case involving the use of a power of attorney in DeVenne v. DeVenne, 2026 NSSC 61 (CanLII).  The…

Read More

Energy Watch 2026

Atlantic Canada’s energy transition is gaining real momentum. From large-scale wind projects and hydrogen development to new regulatory frameworks and grid investments, each province is playing a distinct role in…

Read More

Confirming the coverage analysis: Emond v Trillium Mutual Insurance Co.

By Tipper McEwan, Shelley Wood, K.C., and Jennifer Taylor In an important case for property insurers and their counsel, the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) recently reviewed the principles of…

Read More

Changes and restrictions to New Brunswick’s Atlantic Immigration Program

BY Chiara Nannucci

By Chiara Nannucci New Brunswick has introduced several updates and restrictions to applications under the Atlantic Immigration Program (“AIP”), effective February 3, 2026. These changes affect employers’ participation, applicants’ eligibility,…

Read More

Canada’s new Defence Industrial Strategy

BY Erin Best (she/her) & Robert Bradley

By Erin Best & Robert Bradley On February 17, 2026, the Government of Canada released its Defence Industrial Strategy (the “Strategy”). This follows a series of announcements highlighting the Government’s…

Read More

Timing is not everything – Alberta Human Rights Tribunal finds that termination during medical leave did not amount to discrimination

BY Jacob Zelman

By Jacob Zelman An employer has succeeded before Alberta’s Human Rights Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) in a case arising from the termination of an employee shortly after he requested medical leave,…

Read More

Outlook for 2026 proxy season

BY Andrew Burke & Colleen Keyes, K.C. & David Slipp

By Andrew V. Burke, Colleen P. Keyes, David F. Slipp and Logan G. Walters With proxy season on the horizon, many public companies are once again preparing their annual disclosure documents and shareholder materials for…

Read More

Key trends to watch in workplace investigations in 2026

BY Sheila Mecking & John Morse

By Sheila Mecking and John Morse Upcoming Webinar: Evolving Practices in Workplace Investigations: Key Insights for 2026Join us on February 19, 2026 at 10:00 AM AST for a forward-looking discussion…

Read More

Lawrence Estate (Part II): How does a mistake affect a contract between heirs?

BY Tipper McEwan

By Tipper McEwan Four children made an agreement shortly after their mother’s death to divide any jointly held asset equally.  What none of them knew at the time was that one…

Read More

Search Archive