Skip to content

Client Update: Requirement to register as a mortgage brokerage and mortgage administrator in New Brunswick

On April 1, 2016 New Brunswick’s Mortgage Brokers Act came into force, requiring businesses acting as mortgage brokerages or as mortgage administrators in New Brunswick to be licensed.

A mortgage brokerage is a business that on behalf of another person solicits third parties to obtain mortgage loans or to make an investment in a mortgage. Businesses that negotiate mortgage loans or investments on behalf of others, or that provide advice in regards to mortgage loans or investments, also acts as a mortgage brokerages. The individual mortgage brokers and associates who act on behalf of mortgage brokerages must also be licensed.

Mortgage administrators are businesses that receive payments from a borrower and remit those payments to investors, monitor the performance of a borrower or enforce a mortgage.

Licence application process 

Licences are granted and administered by New Brunswick’s Financial and Consumer Services Commission. Applications are completed online. The application fee for a mortgage brokerage and mortgage administrator is $600. In addition, there is an annual fee of $600 to maintain either licence. The application fee for a mortgage broker and mortgage associate is $300, with an annual fee of $300 to maintain either licence. Additional financial security may also be required for a licence, which is determined on a case by case basis.

The application for a mortgage administrator licence also requires the following from applicants:

  1. A trust account maintained in New Brunswick for funds received under administered mortgages;
  2. A minimum of $25,000 in working capital, or such higher amount determined to be necessary;
  3. Registration as a New Brunswick corporation or extra-provincial corporation;
  4. Disclosure forms from its officers and directors concerning previous disciplinary actions, criminal convictions, bankruptcies, judgments and civil proceedings against them;
  5. A director or officer who has been appointed to serve as principal administrator, responsible for reviewing policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the Mortgage Brokers Act;
  6. Proof of a policy of errors and omission insurance that provides for extended coverage for losses from fraudulent acts, at a minimum coverage of $500,000 with respect to a single occurrence, and $1,000,000 with respect to all occurrences involving the mortgage administrator in a one year period; and
  7. Completion of a disclosure as to whether the applicant has been previously licensed or registered anywhere in any capacity to deal with the public, whether any such registration or licencing was refused, restricted, suspended, revoked or cancelled; whether it has been disciplined by a regulatory body or is currently the subject of an investigation conducted by such a body anywhere, and whether or not there are any unsatisfied judgments against it, or any current legal proceedings pending against it.

The application for a mortgage brokerage licence requires all items listed for mortgage administrators plus the following from applicants:

  1. The individual who will be acting as principal broker:
    (a) If the applicant is a corporation, this individual must be a director         or officer;(b) If the applicant is a partnership, this individual must be a partner;
    (c) If the applicant is a limited partnership, this individual must be a         general partner or a director/officer of the corporation that is the
    general partner; or
    (d) If the applicant is a sole proprietorship, the sole proprietor must          act as the principal broker.
  2. Disclosure of the particular business activities the applicant intends to undertake as a mortgage brokerage.

The application for a mortgage broker or associate requires the following:

  1. The name of the brokerage firm the applicant will be working for;
  2. Details of prior mortgage related work experience as well as all prior employment history;
  3. Completion of a disclosure as to whether the applicant has been previously licensed or registered anywhere in any capacity to deal with the public, whether any such registration or licensing was refused, restricted, suspended, revoked or cancelled; and whether the applicant has been disciplined by a regulatory body or is currently the subject of an investigation conducted by such a body anywhere;
  4. Disclosure of any judgments, civil proceedings, criminal convictions, or bankruptcies against the applicant;
  5. Disclosure of any dismissals for cause;
  6. Proof of completion of the educational requirements; and
  7. A Criminal Records Check report.

Failure to obtain a licence

If a corporation, partnership, or limited partnership acts as a mortgage brokerage without first obtaining a licence it is liable to pay a fine that will not exceed $1,000,000 for each occurrence. Similarly if a corporation were to act as a mortgage administrator without first obtaining a licence it is liable to pay a fine that will not exceed $1,000,000 for each occurrence.

If a sole proprietor acts as a mortgage brokerage without first obtaining a licence they are liable to pay a fine that will not exceed $500,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year, for each occurrence. Similarly if an individual were to act as a mortgage broker or mortgage associate without first obtaining a licence, they would liable to pay a fine that will not exceed $500,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year, for each occurrence.

It should also be noted that the Mortgage Brokers Act does not provide for any grace period, during which a business could act as a mortgage brokerage or mortgage administrator without a licence. A licence must be obtained prior to acting as a mortgage brokerage or mortgage administrator.

Should you have any questions about this legislation or the application process, please contact James Murphy or Christopher Marr.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Top five employment law issues going into 2021

January 15, 2021

Grant Machum, ICD.D and Mark Tector 2020 was a challenging year for many people and businesses. And while we are all happy to have 2020 in the rearview mirror, we anticipate that there will continue to…

Read More

Canada’s carbon tax – an increase and a refresher

January 14, 2021

Kevin Landry and William Wojcik On December 11, 2020, the federal government announced Canada’s strengthened climate plan in a document titled A Healthy Environment and a Healthy Economy (“Plan”). The Plan proposes to increase the carbon…

Read More

The end of the Mechanics’ Lien Act

January 13, 2021

Kenneth McCullogh, QC and Conor O’Neil, P.Eng. On December 18, 2020, the Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick passed the Construction Remedies Act. The new legislation will not take effect until a date to be named…

Read More

Communication breakdown: Offensive comments can constitute cause under Canada Labour Code

January 13, 2021

Mark Tector In a recent decision, an adjudicator upheld the dismissal of an employee/complainant who made inappropriate and offensive remarks on a call with a customer (Crawford v Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce). The complainant…

Read More

2020 Year in Review: Atlantic Canada Labour & Employment Law Developments

January 11, 2021

2020 brought us all challenges that have been unprecedented in our time. The COVID-19 global pandemic has impacted us in ways that were unimaginable. As Atlantic Canada navigated the challenges of changing worlds, and workplaces,…

Read More

New pre-boarding COVID-19 testing requirements

January 7, 2021

Kathleen Leighton On December 31, 2020, the Honourable Marc Garneau, Minister of Transport, announced new pre-boarding COVID-19 testing requirements that would be coming into effect in short order. In particular, as of January 6, 2021…

Read More

La Dolce Vita and design: Italian Court confirms copyright of concept store

January 6, 2021

Daniela Bassan, QC, has published an article in volume 36 of the Canadian Intellectual Property Review. She comments on an Italian case granting copyright protection for a retail store in the cosmetics industry, and considers…

Read More

Duty of honest performance in termination of commercial contracts – the Supreme Court of Canada elaborates in Callow v. Zollinger, 2020 SCC 45

January 4, 2021

Rob Aske In late December 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) issued a key decision elaborating on the duty of honesty in relation to termination of a commercial contract. This duty was primarily established…

Read More

Ongoing flexibility for international students due to COVID-19

December 29, 2020

Included in Discovery: Atlantic Education & the Law – Issue 07 Kathleen Leighton Educational institutions and their students continue to face challenges as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and international students are particularly impacted…

Read More

Institutional responsibility to prepare for COVID-19 cases on campus

December 23, 2020

Included in Discovery: Atlantic Education & the Law – Issue 07 Kate Jurgens Since returning to class in September amidst the uncertainty of the COVID-19 global pandemic, students and faculty alike in classrooms, on campus,…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top