CAPSA releases guidelines on Capital Accumulation Plans and Pension Plan Risk Management
On September 9, 2024, the Canadian Association of Pension Supervisory Authorities (CAPSA) released the long-awaited final revisions to Guideline No. 3 – Guideline for Capital Accumulation Plans (CAPs) and the new Guideline No. 10 – Risk Management for Pension Plans.
Revised CAP Guideline
As we profiled in our prior update on the consultation draft, the draft revised Guideline featured a broadened definition of CAP to include Locked-in Retirement Accounts (LIRAs), Registered Retirement Income Funds (RRIFs), Life Income Funds (LIFs), Pooled Registered Pension Plans (PRPPs), Voluntary Retirement Savings Plans (VRSPs), and Tax-Free Savings Accounts (TFSAs). The final revised Guideline expanded this definition to additionally include First-Home Savings Accounts (FHSAs).
The revised Guideline categorize CAP sponsors by common plan types – this includes employers sponsoring any of the above plans, who may not previously have been subject to any such Guideline. To supplement the breakdown in the draft, the final revised Guideline also notes that some common types of plans may be sponsored by financial institutions and trustee boards / pension committees.
While the draft revised Guideline had noted that all CAP sponsors have some level of common law fiduciary responsibility, this was rephrased in the final revised Guideline to reference responsibilities, which may in some instances include fiduciary responsibility. The list of factors that the draft revised Guideline set out affecting a CAP sponsor’s fiduciary duties was largely removed in the final version.
The final revised CAP Guideline features an enhanced section on a service provider’s responsibilities, including remaining compliant with the Guideline and with applicable laws, clearly communicating to members as to whether the service provider is providing investment advice, and informing the sponsors (and, where appropriate, members) about monetary benefits to the service provider from decisions made by the sponsor or members, beyond the fees disclosed.
Further recommendations for CAP members have also been enunciated, including that they should obtain investment advice from a qualified individual, in addition to using the resources provided by the sponsor. This reflects the recommendations in the draft revised Guideline that members be provided access to such tools and information. The final revised Guideline also features a greatly enhanced list of members’ responsibilities, which are recommended to be clearly communicated to members.
Other changes in the draft revised Guideline include setting out recommendations regarding establishing a governance framework, and adding automatic features to the CAP, including default investment options. Additionally, the final version recommends reasonable advance notice where an automatic feature impacts a member.
New Risk Management Guideline
CAPSA has also simultaneously published its new Risk Management Guideline which consolidates its recommendations on approaches to a number of risks for pension plans under a risk management framework to identify, evaluate, manage and monitor material risks. Specific risks addressed, which can be supplemented in future updates as risks develop, include:
- cybersecurity;
- use of leverage;
- third-party advisors or service providers;
- investment governance; and
- environmental, social and governance (ESG).
Notable changes since the prior draft Guideline include replacing “risk capacity” (e.g. ability to withstand volatility) with “risk limits” (a threshold not to be crossed), as one of three key considerations recommended to inform the plan sponsor’s overall risk assessment. Further, the final Guideline now includes no guidance on “target pension arrangements” related risk, although that had been part of an earlier draft.
Implementation
Because of the large volume of revisions to the CAP Guideline, including their enhanced scope, CAPs and their plan sponsors are recommended to review policies and practices regarding governance, plan structure, options, communications, record-keeping, and service provider agreements, as well as any applicable laws, in light of the revised recommendations. Similarly, pension plans should additionally review and incorporate the Risk Management Guidelines recommendations into their risk management frameworks. Both guidelines recognize that appropriate measures will be proportional with the risks associated with a plan and the approaches to implement such recommendations will depend on the size and sophistication of the plan. Some key takeaways include:
- Establish and periodically review a governance and risk management framework with processes and controls that are proportional with the risks associated with the plan;
- Review requirements with service providers to ensure compliance with applicable laws and reasonableness of fees and expenses;
- Document risks and controls and review them on an ongoing basis.
In the release announcement, CAPSA seems to suggest that some pension plans will have no issue incorporating the above-noted guidelines as of the date of release. However, where IT system changes or process changes are needed to support the guidelines, CAPSA recommends they be implemented by January 1, 2026.
This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Pensions & Benefits Group.
Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.
Archive
Dante Manna with the assistance of Kali Robertson (summer student) The Nova Scotia Government recently released regulations reassigning the authority for administering financial hardship unlocking in the province. Effective July 1, 2021, individuals will apply directly…
Read MoreBrittany Trafford The Canadian borders have been restricted for over a year now and many families have struggled with being separated. Throughout 2020 and early 2021 restrictions have fluctuated as the federal government tried to…
Read MoreHarold Smith, QC with the assistance of Matthew Raske (summer student) A recent labour arbitration decision, Unifor Local 64 and Corner Brook Pulp and Paper Limited, shows how the permissibility of drug and alcohol testing continues…
Read MoreBrittany Trafford Last week the Maritime provinces announced various re-opening plans based on vaccine trajectories, with Newfoundland and Labrador making an announcement today¹. These plans address, among other things, who will be able to enter…
Read More*Last updated: May 31, 2021 (Originally published April 1, 2020) Kathleen Leighton Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there are various implications for the immigration world, including for those already in Canada, as well as those…
Read MoreKatharine Mack Premier Ian Rankin and Chief Medical Officer of Health Dr. Robert Strang provided details on Nova Scotia’s reopening plan this afternoon. The Province’s plan has a total of 5 phases. Phase 1, which focuses…
Read MoreChad Sullivan A recent labour arbitration decision (Canadian Broadcasting Corp. and Canadian Media Guild (Khan), Re, 2021 CanLII 761) provides another example of how privacy law continues to evolve and can directly impact the outcome…
Read MoreKevin Landry and Annelise Harnanan (summer student) In April 2021, the federal government introduced the draft Retail Payments Activities Act (“RPAA”) as part of Bill C-30, the Act to implement the 2021 federal budget. Under…
Read MoreChristopher Marr, TEP and Level Chan with the assistance of Annelise Harnanan (summer student) On May 20, 2021, the New Brunswick Financial and Consumer Services Commission (“FCNB”) released a revised version of one of its…
Read MoreJennifer Taylor and Bhreagh Ross The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal has overturned a decision that found a Charter right to testamentary freedom. Nova Scotia (Attorney General) v Lawen Estate¹ involved an appeal by…
Read More