CAPSA releases guidelines on Capital Accumulation Plans and Pension Plan Risk Management
On September 9, 2024, the Canadian Association of Pension Supervisory Authorities (CAPSA) released the long-awaited final revisions to Guideline No. 3 – Guideline for Capital Accumulation Plans (CAPs) and the new Guideline No. 10 – Risk Management for Pension Plans.
Revised CAP Guideline
As we profiled in our prior update on the consultation draft, the draft revised Guideline featured a broadened definition of CAP to include Locked-in Retirement Accounts (LIRAs), Registered Retirement Income Funds (RRIFs), Life Income Funds (LIFs), Pooled Registered Pension Plans (PRPPs), Voluntary Retirement Savings Plans (VRSPs), and Tax-Free Savings Accounts (TFSAs). The final revised Guideline expanded this definition to additionally include First-Home Savings Accounts (FHSAs).
The revised Guideline categorize CAP sponsors by common plan types – this includes employers sponsoring any of the above plans, who may not previously have been subject to any such Guideline. To supplement the breakdown in the draft, the final revised Guideline also notes that some common types of plans may be sponsored by financial institutions and trustee boards / pension committees.
While the draft revised Guideline had noted that all CAP sponsors have some level of common law fiduciary responsibility, this was rephrased in the final revised Guideline to reference responsibilities, which may in some instances include fiduciary responsibility. The list of factors that the draft revised Guideline set out affecting a CAP sponsor’s fiduciary duties was largely removed in the final version.
The final revised CAP Guideline features an enhanced section on a service provider’s responsibilities, including remaining compliant with the Guideline and with applicable laws, clearly communicating to members as to whether the service provider is providing investment advice, and informing the sponsors (and, where appropriate, members) about monetary benefits to the service provider from decisions made by the sponsor or members, beyond the fees disclosed.
Further recommendations for CAP members have also been enunciated, including that they should obtain investment advice from a qualified individual, in addition to using the resources provided by the sponsor. This reflects the recommendations in the draft revised Guideline that members be provided access to such tools and information. The final revised Guideline also features a greatly enhanced list of members’ responsibilities, which are recommended to be clearly communicated to members.
Other changes in the draft revised Guideline include setting out recommendations regarding establishing a governance framework, and adding automatic features to the CAP, including default investment options. Additionally, the final version recommends reasonable advance notice where an automatic feature impacts a member.
New Risk Management Guideline
CAPSA has also simultaneously published its new Risk Management Guideline which consolidates its recommendations on approaches to a number of risks for pension plans under a risk management framework to identify, evaluate, manage and monitor material risks. Specific risks addressed, which can be supplemented in future updates as risks develop, include:
- cybersecurity;
- use of leverage;
- third-party advisors or service providers;
- investment governance; and
- environmental, social and governance (ESG).
Notable changes since the prior draft Guideline include replacing “risk capacity” (e.g. ability to withstand volatility) with “risk limits” (a threshold not to be crossed), as one of three key considerations recommended to inform the plan sponsor’s overall risk assessment. Further, the final Guideline now includes no guidance on “target pension arrangements” related risk, although that had been part of an earlier draft.
Implementation
Because of the large volume of revisions to the CAP Guideline, including their enhanced scope, CAPs and their plan sponsors are recommended to review policies and practices regarding governance, plan structure, options, communications, record-keeping, and service provider agreements, as well as any applicable laws, in light of the revised recommendations. Similarly, pension plans should additionally review and incorporate the Risk Management Guidelines recommendations into their risk management frameworks. Both guidelines recognize that appropriate measures will be proportional with the risks associated with a plan and the approaches to implement such recommendations will depend on the size and sophistication of the plan. Some key takeaways include:
- Establish and periodically review a governance and risk management framework with processes and controls that are proportional with the risks associated with the plan;
- Review requirements with service providers to ensure compliance with applicable laws and reasonableness of fees and expenses;
- Document risks and controls and review them on an ongoing basis.
In the release announcement, CAPSA seems to suggest that some pension plans will have no issue incorporating the above-noted guidelines as of the date of release. However, where IT system changes or process changes are needed to support the guidelines, CAPSA recommends they be implemented by January 1, 2026.
This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Pensions & Benefits Group.
Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.
Archive
Employers are navigating uncharted territory when it comes to COVID-19 vaccines, from employee health and safety, to workplace policies, privacy and human rights concerns, a panel of Firm lawyers sit down and explore the complicated…
Read MoreKevin Landry and Annelise Harnanan (summer student) Recently, the Advisory Committee on Open Banking released the Final Report of the Advisory Committee on Open Banking, (“Report”) confirming its intention to implement a broader, more modernized…
Read MoreKathleen Nash In a recent decision, McCallum v Saputo,¹ the Manitoba Court of Appeal confirmed that an employer does not have a “free-standing, actionable duty” to investigate an employee’s conduct prior to dismissal.² The Court of Appeal held…
Read MoreBrendan Sheridan The Government of Canada is undertaking a phased approach to re-opening the international border. While the government has had limited exemptions to the travel prohibitions throughout the pandemic, the loosening of the restrictions…
Read MoreKevin Landry On August 3, 2021 the Canadian Securities Administrators (“CSA”) announced plans to combine the Investment Industry Regulation Organization of Canada (“IIROC”) with the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada (“MFDA”). This move will…
Read MoreJohn Samms, with the assistance of Olivia Bungay (summer student) In a recent decision, S.D. v Eastern Regional Integrated Health Authority, 2021 NLSC 100, the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador denied the Plaintiff’s application…
Read MoreRichard Jordan and Folu Adesanya The 2021 Nova Scotia general election will be held on August 17, 2021. With the election looming, many Nova Scotians will be wondering the same question: “Am I entitled to…
Read MoreIn the second episode of our labour and employment podcast, Workplace Issues in Atlantic Canada: A Legal Perspective, host and practice group leader Rick Dunlop speaks with Annie Gray and Dante Manna about the Federal…
Read MoreIncluded in Discovery: Atlantic Education & the Law – Issue 08 Clarence Bennett It is increasingly difficult to reconcile the rights of a student charged with sexual assault, with the rights of the victim, along…
Read MoreIncluded in Discovery: Atlantic Education & the Law – Issue 08 Jacob Zelman Striking the proper balance Public discourse around instances of sexual violence is at an all-time high. In the wake of the #MeToo…
Read More