Skip to content

CAPSA releases guidelines on Capital Accumulation Plans and Pension Plan Risk Management

Level Chan and Dante Manna

On September 9, 2024, the Canadian Association of Pension Supervisory Authorities (CAPSA) released the long-awaited final revisions to Guideline No. 3 – Guideline for Capital Accumulation Plans (CAPs) and the new Guideline No. 10 – Risk Management for Pension Plans.

Revised CAP Guideline

As we profiled in our prior update on the consultation draft, the draft revised Guideline featured a broadened definition of CAP to include Locked-in Retirement Accounts (LIRAs), Registered Retirement Income Funds (RRIFs), Life Income Funds (LIFs), Pooled Registered Pension Plans (PRPPs), Voluntary Retirement Savings Plans (VRSPs), and Tax-Free Savings Accounts (TFSAs).  The final revised Guideline expanded this definition to additionally include First-Home Savings Accounts (FHSAs).

The revised Guideline categorize CAP sponsors by common plan types – this includes employers sponsoring any of the above plans, who may not previously have been subject to any such Guideline.  To supplement the breakdown in the draft, the final revised Guideline also notes that some common types of plans may be sponsored by financial institutions and trustee boards / pension committees.

While the draft revised Guideline had noted that all CAP sponsors have some level of common law fiduciary responsibility, this was rephrased in the final revised Guideline to reference responsibilities, which may in some instances include fiduciary responsibility.  The list of factors that the draft revised Guideline set out affecting a CAP sponsor’s fiduciary duties was largely removed in the final version.

The final revised CAP Guideline features an enhanced section on a service provider’s responsibilities, including remaining compliant with the Guideline and with applicable laws, clearly communicating to members as to whether the service provider is providing investment advice, and informing the sponsors (and, where appropriate, members) about monetary benefits to the service provider from decisions made by the sponsor or members, beyond the fees disclosed.

Further recommendations for CAP members have also been enunciated, including that they should obtain investment advice from a qualified individual, in addition to using the resources provided by the sponsor.  This reflects the recommendations in the draft revised Guideline that members be provided access to such tools and information.  The final revised Guideline also features a greatly enhanced list of members’ responsibilities, which are recommended to be clearly communicated to members.

Other changes in the draft revised Guideline include setting out recommendations regarding establishing a governance framework, and adding automatic features to the CAP, including default investment options.  Additionally, the final version recommends reasonable advance notice where an automatic feature impacts a member.

New Risk Management Guideline

CAPSA has also simultaneously published its new Risk Management Guideline which consolidates its recommendations on approaches to a number of risks for pension plans under a risk management framework to identify, evaluate, manage and monitor material risks.  Specific risks addressed, which can be supplemented in future updates as risks develop, include:

  • cybersecurity;
  • use of leverage;
  • third-party advisors or service providers;
  • investment governance; and
  • environmental, social and governance (ESG).

Notable changes since the prior draft Guideline include replacing “risk capacity” (e.g. ability to withstand volatility) with “risk limits” (a threshold not to be crossed), as one of three key considerations recommended to inform the plan sponsor’s overall risk assessment.  Further, the final Guideline now includes no guidance on “target pension arrangements” related risk, although that had been part of an earlier draft.

Implementation

Because of the large volume of revisions to the CAP Guideline, including their enhanced scope, CAPs and their plan sponsors are recommended to review policies and practices regarding governance, plan structure, options, communications, record-keeping, and service provider agreements, as well as any applicable laws, in light of the revised recommendations.  Similarly, pension plans should additionally review and incorporate the Risk Management Guidelines recommendations into their risk management frameworks.  Both guidelines recognize that appropriate measures will be proportional with the risks associated with a plan and the approaches to implement such recommendations will depend on the size and sophistication of the plan.  Some key takeaways include:

  • Establish and periodically review a governance and risk management framework with processes and controls that are proportional with the risks associated with the plan;
  • Review requirements with service providers to ensure compliance with applicable laws and reasonableness of fees and expenses;
  • Document risks and controls and review them on an ongoing basis.

In the release announcement, CAPSA seems to suggest that some pension plans will have no issue incorporating the above-noted guidelines as of the date of release. However, where IT system changes or process changes are needed to support the guidelines, CAPSA recommends they be implemented by January 1, 2026.


This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Pensions & Benefits Group.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

Workplace investigation helps avoid costly litigation

July 29, 2024

By Sheila Mecking and Lauren Sorel The British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal (“BCHRT”) recently dismissed a complaint of discrimination in the workplace, stating that the employer’s investigation, and settlement offer, adequately resolved the complaint.1 The …

Read More

Cybersecurity class actions against database defendants persist, but hurdles for plaintiffs remain

July 25, 2024

By Sarah Dever Letson, CIPP/C, Meaghan McCaw and Bertina Lou[1] Two decisions earlier this month from the Court of Appeal for British Columbia left open the question as to whether so-called “database defendants” can be held…

Read More

Let’s talk about batteries: Nova Scotia Power’s latest development in renewable energy

July 18, 2024

In conjunction with our upcoming sponsorship of the Halifax Chamber of Commerce luncheon, featuring the Minister of Energy and Natural Resources the Hon. Jonathan Wilkinson, we are pleased to present a Thought Leadership article highlighting…

Read More

“Sale” away: The SCC’s more flexible approach to exclusion clauses in contracts for the sale of goods

July 9, 2024

By Jennifer Taylor & Marina Luro A recent Supreme Court of Canada decision has clarified how to interpret exclusion clauses in sale of goods contracts. The Court in Earthco Soil Mixtures Inc. v Pine Valley…

Read More

Recent case re-confirms temporary ailment is not a disability

June 24, 2024

By Mark Tector and Tiegan A. Scott Decision On April 3, 2024, the Alberta Court of King’s Bench (“ABKB”) upheld a decision of the Chief of the Commissions and Tribunals (the “CCT Decision”), which held…

Read More

Compensation for expropriation: Fair, but not more than fair

June 17, 2024

By Erin Best, Stephen Penney, Robert Bradley, Megan Kieley1 and Elizabeth Fleet1 Expropriation is a live issue in Canadian courts. The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision to broaden the test for constructive expropriation in Annapolis…

Read More

Changes affecting federally regulated employers

June 10, 2024

By Killian McParland and Sophie Poulos There have been many changes in recent months affecting employers governed by federal labour and employment laws. In September 2024, Stewart McKelvey will be hosting a webinar to review…

Read More

Impending changes to Nova Scotia’s Workers’ Compensation Act – Gradual onset stress

June 4, 2024

By Mark Tector and Annie Gray What’s changing? Currently, workers’ compensation coverage in Nova Scotia applies to only a narrow subset of psychological injuries. Specifically, in Nova Scotia – as in all Atlantic Provinces –…

Read More

Appeal Courts uphold substantial costs awards for regulators

May 22, 2024

By Sean Kelly & Michiko Gartshore Professional regulators can incur substantial costs through discipline processes. These costs are often associated with investigations, hearings as well as committee member expenses and are an unfortunate by-product of…

Read More

Less than two weeks to go … Canada Supply Chain Transparency Reports are due May 31st

May 21, 2024

By Christine Pound, ICD.D., Twila Reid, ICD.D., Sarah Dever Letson, CIPP/C, Sheila Mecking, Hilary Newman, and Daniel Roth Introduction The first reports under the Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act (the…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top