Skip to content

Bill C-49 is blowin’ a gale: A significant step in offshore renewable energy legislation

By Sadira Jan, Dave Randell, Nancy Rubin, G. John Samms, Kimberly MacLachlan, and  Jamie Gamblin

Bill C-49 received Royal Assent and will amend the Canada–Newfoundland and Labrador Atlantic Accord Implementation Act and the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Resources Accord Implementation Act to allow for offshore renewable energy development in Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador. The changes are a welcomed addition to Atlantic Canada’s energy landscape.

Introduced in May 2023, Bill C-49 passed through various stages in the House of Commons and the Senate. Nova Scotia recently passed its mirror legislation which has not yet been proclaimed into force in the Advancing Nova Scotia Opportunities Act (Bill 471).  Newfoundland and Labrador have yet to introduce their mirror legislation.

House of Commons Senate
1st Reading – May 30, 2023 1st Reading – May 30, 2024
2nd Reading – October 17, 2023 2nd Reading – June 6, 2024
Committee – April 18, 2024 Committee – September 25, 2024
Report Stage – May 2, 2024 Report Stage – September 26, 2024
3rd Reading – May 29, 2024 3rd Reading – October 1, 2024
Royal Assent – October 3, 2024

 

Expanded regulation

Bill C-49 renames the offshore petroleum energy regulators in Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador (the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board (“CNSOPB“) and the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board (“CNLOPB“)) to the Canada–Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Energy Regulator and the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Energy Regulator to oversee offshore renewable energy projects (the “Regulators“).

  • Bill C-49 defines an offshore renewable energy project as any research or assessment conducted with respect to the exploitation or potential exploitation of renewable energy resources to produce an energy project (unless it is conducted by or on behalf of a government or educational institution) and the actual exploitation, storage, or transmission of an energy product produced from a renewable resource (NS – section 109(3); NL – section 3 (3)).
  • To date, oil and gas activities in the offshore areas of Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador have been regulated through the CNSOPB and CNLOPB including licensing, compliance, exploration and decommissioning. (See June 1, 2023 update.)

Full and fair participation for Canadians

Canadian corporations and residents will have full and fair participation in offshore renewable energy work and projects including in the course of employment and in the supply of goods and services. Bill C-49 focuses on the participation of under-represented groups. The impacts of offshore renewable energy projects on fishing activity will also be considered important in the issuance of submerged land licences (NS – section 98.7; NL – section 96.6).

Submerged land licensing

Bill C-49 establishes the process for issuing submerged land licences and an associated revenue regime for such licences.

  • Submerged land licences may be limited to particular technologies or types of renewable energy resources as defined in the licence (NS – section 91(3); NL – section 88(3)).
  • A submerged land licence will not be required for research, or assessments conducted in relation to the exploitation of a renewable resource that does not require attaching a facility or structure to the seabed (NS – section 91(4); NL – section 88(4)).
  • A submerged land licence in relation to Crown reserve land will not be issued unless a call for bids process is conducted by the Regulators (NS – section 93(1); NL – section 90(1)) or an exception applies (NS – section 97(1); NL – section 94(1)).
  • A submerged land licence (or shares in a submerged land license) may only be held by a “corporation incorporated in Canada” (NS – section 98.6; NL – section 96.5).
  • The consolidation of two or more submerged land licences into one licence (NS – section 98.4(3); NL – section 96.3 (3)) is permitted.

Environmental and health and safety priorities

The environmental protection and occupational health and safety regimes have been expanded to include offshore renewable energy projects.

  • The Regulators may, by order, prohibit work in offshore areas if there is an environmental or social issue of “serious” nature, or dangerous or extreme weather conditions (NS – section 59(1); NL – section 56(1)).
  • The Regulators may make regulations prohibiting an offshore renewable energy project or the issuance of interests if the offshore area is identified as an area for environmental or wildlife conservation or protection (NS – section 59.1; NL – section 56.1).
  • Interest owners may be required to surrender or cancel their interests for environmental or wildlife conservation or protection (NS – section 59.2 (1) and (4); NL – section 56.2(1) and (4)). Compensation may be awarded to an interest owner if an interest is cancelled or surrendered as a result (NS – section 59.3; NL – section 56.3).
  • There is a prohibition on any “debris” being left in offshore areas (NS – section 188.18(1); NL – section 183.18(1)). Debris is defined as any facility or structure that has been abandoned without authorization or any material that has broken away or has been displaced from an abandoned facility (NS – section 188.17(1); NL – section 183.17(1)).
  • The Regulators have the authority to direct public inquiries if a spill, debris, accident, or incident results in death or injury or there is danger to public safety or the environment (NS – section 188.23(1); NL – section 183.23(1)).

Transboundary hydrocarbon management regime

Bill C-49 establishes a transboundary hydrocarbon management regime in an offshore renewable energy context to regulate fields or pools that straddle international and domestic administrative boundaries, new methods of showing hydrocarbon accumulations in geological features, and limits the duration of future significant discovery licences to 25 years. A “significant discovery” is defined as a discovery that demonstrates the existence of hydrocarbons that has the potential for “sustained production.”

  • Transboundary means a pool [or field] that extends beyond the Regulators’ jurisdiction.
  • While transboundary pools are to be exploited as single pools, they can be subject to joint exploitation with a joint exploitation agreement, unit agreement, and unit operating agreement having been entered into and approved (NS – section 188.05(1) and (2)); NL – section 183.05(1) and (2)).
  • With advice from the Regulators, the Federal and Provincial Ministers may enter into joint exploitation agreements with respect to transboundary pools extending into foreign government territory (NS – section 188.06(2); NL – section 183.06(2)).
  • On May 17, 2005, Canada and France signed an agreement relating to the exploration and exploitation of transboundary hydrocarbon fields off the coasts of Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia and the French islands of St. Pierre et Miquelon. While originally for petroleum resources, this agreement will presumably extend to offshore renewable energy projects with these amendments.

Additional changes

Bill C-49 also provides for the following amendments:

  • Adds clarity around the role of the Federal and Provincial Ministers and Regulators with respect to regional and strategic assessments for offshore renewable energy projects. The Regulators may conduct regional and strategic assessments with respect to existing or future offshore renewable energy work (NS – section 142.018(1) and 142.019 (1); NL – section 138.017(1) and 138.018(1)). The Federal and Provincial Ministers may also enter into agreements with jurisdictions authorized under other Federal or Provincial legislation to conduct these assessments (NS – section 142.018(2) and 142.019 (2); NL – section 138.017(2) and 138.018(2)).
  • Allows the Governor in Council to make regulations to regulate offshore infrastructure access (including the enforcement of tolls and tariffs). There is limited information on this at this time and we will continue to monitor.
  • Allows the Crown to rely on the Regulators to consult with the Indigenous peoples of Canada with respect to potential adverse impacts of work or activity in offshore areas on existing Aboriginal and treaty rights (as outlined in the Constitution Act, 1982) and to accommodate those adverse impacts, as appropriate (NS – section 18.1; NL – section 17.1).

This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Energy Group.

Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

SHARE

Archive

Search Archive


 
 

TTC’s Random Testing Decision: A Bright Light for Employers in the Haze of Marijuana Legalization

April 11, 2017

Rick Dunlop In my December 15, 2016 article, Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?, I noted the Report’s1 suggestion that there was a lack of research to reliably determine when individuals are impaired…

Read More

Unionization in the Construction Industry: Vacation Day + Snapshot Rule = Disenfranchisement

April 4, 2017

Rick Dunlop and Michelle Black On March 14, 2014, CanMar Contracting Limited (“CanMar”) granted a day off to two of its hard working and longer serving employees so they could spend time with their respective families. That…

Read More

Sometimes a bad deal is just a bad deal: unconscionability and insurance claim settlements in Downer v Pitcher, 2017 NLCA 13

March 16, 2017

Joe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The doctrine of unconscionability is an equitable remedy available in exceptional circumstances where a bargain between parties, be it a settlement or a release, may be set aside on the basis that…

Read More

Privilege Prevails: Privacy Commissioner protects solicitor-client communications

March 16, 2017

Jonathan Coady After more than five years, the Prince Edward Island Information and Privacy Commissioner (the “Privacy Commissioner”) has completed her review into more than sixty records withheld by a local school board on the…

Read More

The Latest in Labour Law: A Stewart McKelvey Newsletter – Nova Scotia Teachers Union & Government – a synopsis

March 7, 2017

Peter McLellan, QC & Richard Jordan Introduction On February 21, 2017 the Nova Scotia Government passed Bill 75 – the Teachers’ Professional Agreement and Classroom Improvement (2017) Act. This Bulletin will provide some background to what is, today,…

Read More

Scotia Mortgage Corporation v Furlong: The Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador weighs in on the former client rule in commercial transactions

March 1, 2017

Bruce Grant, QC and Justin Hewitt In the recent decision of Scotia Mortgage Corporation v Furlong1 the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador confirmed that where a law firm acts jointly for the borrower and lender in the placement…

Read More

The Ordinary Meaning of Insurance: Client Update on the SCC’s Decision in Sabean

February 21, 2017

The Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Sabean v Portage La Prairie Mutual Insurance Co, 2017 SCC 7 at the end of January, finally answering an insurance policy question that had divided the lower…

Read More

Client Update: Outlook for the 2017 Proxy Season

February 8, 2017

In preparing for the 2017 proxy season, you should be aware of some regulatory changes and institutional investor guidance that may impact disclosure to, and interactions with, your shareholders. This update highlights what is new…

Read More

Client Update: The Future of Planning and Development on Prince Edward Island – Recent Amendments to the Planning Act

January 23, 2017

Perlene Morrison and Hilary Newman During the fall 2016 legislative sitting, the Province of Prince Edward Island passed legislation that results in significant changes to the Planning Act. The amendments received royal assent on December 15, 2016 and…

Read More

Plaintiffs’ medical reports – disclosure obligations in Unifund Assurance Company v. Churchill, 2016 NLCA 73

January 10, 2017

Joe Thorne1 and Justin Hewitt2 In Unifund Assurance Company v Churchill,3  the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal considered the application of our rules of court and the common law as they relate to disclosure of documents produced in…

Read More

Search Archive


Scroll To Top