Skip to Content

Bill C-49 is blowin’ a gale: A significant step in offshore renewable energy legislation

By Sadira Jan, Dave Randell, Nancy Rubin, G. John Samms, Kimberly MacLachlan, and  Jamie Gamblin

Bill C-49 received Royal Assent and will amend the Canada–Newfoundland and Labrador Atlantic Accord Implementation Act and the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Resources Accord Implementation Act to allow for offshore renewable energy development in Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador. The changes are a welcomed addition to Atlantic Canada’s energy landscape.

Introduced in May 2023, Bill C-49 passed through various stages in the House of Commons and the Senate. Nova Scotia recently passed its mirror legislation which has not yet been proclaimed into force in the Advancing Nova Scotia Opportunities Act (Bill 471).  Newfoundland and Labrador have yet to introduce their mirror legislation.

House of CommonsSenate
1st Reading – May 30, 20231st Reading – May 30, 2024
2nd Reading – October 17, 20232nd Reading – June 6, 2024
Committee – April 18, 2024Committee – September 25, 2024
Report Stage – May 2, 2024Report Stage – September 26, 2024
3rd Reading – May 29, 20243rd Reading – October 1, 2024
 Royal Assent – October 3, 2024

Bill C-49 renames the offshore petroleum energy regulators in Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador (the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board (“CNSOPB“) and the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board (“CNLOPB“)) to the Canada–Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Energy Regulator and the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Energy Regulator to oversee offshore renewable energy projects (the “Regulators“).

  • Bill C-49 defines an offshore renewable energy project as any research or assessment conducted with respect to the exploitation or potential exploitation of renewable energy resources to produce an energy project (unless it is conducted by or on behalf of a government or educational institution) and the actual exploitation, storage, or transmission of an energy product produced from a renewable resource (NS – section 109(3); NL – section 3 (3)).
  • To date, oil and gas activities in the offshore areas of Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador have been regulated through the CNSOPB and CNLOPB including licensing, compliance, exploration and decommissioning. (See June 1, 2023 update.)

Canadian corporations and residents will have full and fair participation in offshore renewable energy work and projects including in the course of employment and in the supply of goods and services. Bill C-49 focuses on the participation of under-represented groups. The impacts of offshore renewable energy projects on fishing activity will also be considered important in the issuance of submerged land licences (NS – section 98.7; NL – section 96.6).

Bill C-49 establishes the process for issuing submerged land licences and an associated revenue regime for such licences.

  • Submerged land licences may be limited to particular technologies or types of renewable energy resources as defined in the licence (NS – section 91(3); NL – section 88(3)).
  • A submerged land licence will not be required for research, or assessments conducted in relation to the exploitation of a renewable resource that does not require attaching a facility or structure to the seabed (NS – section 91(4); NL – section 88(4)).
  • A submerged land licence in relation to Crown reserve land will not be issued unless a call for bids process is conducted by the Regulators (NS – section 93(1); NL – section 90(1)) or an exception applies (NS – section 97(1); NL – section 94(1)).
  • A submerged land licence (or shares in a submerged land license) may only be held by a “corporation incorporated in Canada” (NS – section 98.6; NL – section 96.5).
  • The consolidation of two or more submerged land licences into one licence (NS – section 98.4(3); NL – section 96.3 (3)) is permitted.

The environmental protection and occupational health and safety regimes have been expanded to include offshore renewable energy projects.

  • The Regulators may, by order, prohibit work in offshore areas if there is an environmental or social issue of “serious” nature, or dangerous or extreme weather conditions (NS – section 59(1); NL – section 56(1)).
  • The Regulators may make regulations prohibiting an offshore renewable energy project or the issuance of interests if the offshore area is identified as an area for environmental or wildlife conservation or protection (NS – section 59.1; NL – section 56.1).
  • Interest owners may be required to surrender or cancel their interests for environmental or wildlife conservation or protection (NS – section 59.2 (1) and (4); NL – section 56.2(1) and (4)). Compensation may be awarded to an interest owner if an interest is cancelled or surrendered as a result (NS – section 59.3; NL – section 56.3).
  • There is a prohibition on any “debris” being left in offshore areas (NS – section 188.18(1); NL – section 183.18(1)). Debris is defined as any facility or structure that has been abandoned without authorization or any material that has broken away or has been displaced from an abandoned facility (NS – section 188.17(1); NL – section 183.17(1)).
  • The Regulators have the authority to direct public inquiries if a spill, debris, accident, or incident results in death or injury or there is danger to public safety or the environment (NS – section 188.23(1); NL – section 183.23(1)).

Bill C-49 establishes a transboundary hydrocarbon management regime in an offshore renewable energy context to regulate fields or pools that straddle international and domestic administrative boundaries, new methods of showing hydrocarbon accumulations in geological features, and limits the duration of future significant discovery licences to 25 years. A “significant discovery” is defined as a discovery that demonstrates the existence of hydrocarbons that has the potential for “sustained production.”

  • Transboundary means a pool [or field] that extends beyond the Regulators’ jurisdiction.
  • While transboundary pools are to be exploited as single pools, they can be subject to joint exploitation with a joint exploitation agreement, unit agreement, and unit operating agreement having been entered into and approved (NS – section 188.05(1) and (2)); NL – section 183.05(1) and (2)).
  • With advice from the Regulators, the Federal and Provincial Ministers may enter into joint exploitation agreements with respect to transboundary pools extending into foreign government territory (NS – section 188.06(2); NL – section 183.06(2)).
  • On May 17, 2005, Canada and France signed an agreement relating to the exploration and exploitation of transboundary hydrocarbon fields off the coasts of Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia and the French islands of St. Pierre et Miquelon. While originally for petroleum resources, this agreement will presumably extend to offshore renewable energy projects with these amendments.

Bill C-49 also provides for the following amendments:

  • Adds clarity around the role of the Federal and Provincial Ministers and Regulators with respect to regional and strategic assessments for offshore renewable energy projects. The Regulators may conduct regional and strategic assessments with respect to existing or future offshore renewable energy work (NS – section 142.018(1) and 142.019 (1); NL – section 138.017(1) and 138.018(1)). The Federal and Provincial Ministers may also enter into agreements with jurisdictions authorized under other Federal or Provincial legislation to conduct these assessments (NS – section 142.018(2) and 142.019 (2); NL – section 138.017(2) and 138.018(2)).
  • Allows the Governor in Council to make regulations to regulate offshore infrastructure access (including the enforcement of tolls and tariffs). There is limited information on this at this time and we will continue to monitor.
  • Allows the Crown to rely on the Regulators to consult with the Indigenous peoples of Canada with respect to potential adverse impacts of work or activity in offshore areas on existing Aboriginal and treaty rights (as outlined in the Constitution Act, 1982) and to accommodate those adverse impacts, as appropriate (NS – section 18.1; NL – section 17.1).

This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact a member of our Energy Group.

Click hereto subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.

Archive

A changing tide: The Ontario Court of Appeal adopts a common-sense approach to interpreting termination clauses and provides much-needed guidance

BY Rick Dunlop & Jennifer Ronalds

By Rick Dunlop and Jennifer Ronalds There has been much uncertainty in recent years with respect to the enforceability of termination clauses in employment contracts. In Baker v. Van Dolder’s…

Read More

Testing the limits: New developments in workplace drug and alcohol testing

BY Killian McParland & Onye Njoku

By Killian McParland and Onye Njoku A recent labour arbitration decision, Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 113 v Toronto Transit Commission, struck down the random drug and alcohol testing program of…

Read More

Deed Transfer Tax not payable on Purchase of Securities – HRM v. Rank Incorporated

BY Robert Grant, K.C. & Sam Ward

Robert Grant, K.C. and Sam Ward In HRM v Rank Incorporated, 2026 NSSC 217, Justice John Keith of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia determined that Deed Transfer Tax was…

Read More

Early court decisions on generative AI: What Canadian businesses need to know

BY Matthew N. Craig

Matthew N. Craig and Sam Schonfeld Regardless of which industry you are a part of, you have likely noticed the adoption of generative artificial intelligence (“GenAI”) all around you. Increasingly,…

Read More

Government of Canada introduces Protecting Privacy and Consumer Data Act

Sarah Dever Letson, CIPP/C, Maria Cummings, and Keeley A. Hussey On June 15, 2026, Bill C-36, An Act to enact the Protecting Privacy and Consumer Data Act, to amend the…

Read More

PEI’s new Employment Standards Act is now in force: What employers need to do now

Murray L. Murphy, K.C., CPHR and Jacob E. Zelman In our earlier update issued in March 2025 (At a glance: Key changes coming to Prince Edward Island’s Employment Standards Act), we flagged…

Read More

More health profession migrations: An update on Nova Scotia’s Regulated Health Professions Act

BY Tyana R. Caplan & Jennifer Taylor

By Tyana Caplan & Jennifer Taylor The midpoint of 2026 provides a timely opportunity to review which health professions in Nova Scotia have now migrated to the Regulated Health Professions…

Read More

A reason to reconsider probate planning in New Brunswick

By Christopher Marr, TEP, Partner with assistance from Brady McKinley, student-at-law Significant increase to New Brunswick probate tax and fees Effective as of June 12, 2026, probate fees and taxes have significantly increased…

Read More

Coverage – Policy Interpretation – Causation

BY Tipper McEwan

By Tipper McEwan In Green Rise Foods Inc. v. N.V. Hagelunie, 2026 ONCA 334 (CanLII),the Court of Appeal for Ontario considered a case involving a series of potential causes for…

Read More

Back to the office? Not without notice: BC Court of Appeal confirms work-from-home can be a binding term of employment

BY Sacha Morisset, K.C.

By Sacha D. Morisset, K.C. The British Columbia Court of Appeal has upheld a finding of constructive dismissal against a Vancouver real estate developer that directed a longtime remote employee…

Read More

Search Archive