Bank of Canada Announces Supervisory Framework for Retail Payments Activities Act
By Kevin Landry and Colton Smith
The Bank of Canada (“BoC”) has announced the supervisory framework (the “Framework”) it will use to oversee payment service providers under the Retail Payments Activities Act.
The Retail Payments Activities Act was enacted by the federal government in June 2021 with the objective of regulating retail payment providers in Canada. See our previous update about it here.
The Role of the Bank of Canada
Under the Retail Payments Activities Act, the BoC has been provided a supervisory authority over payment service providers performing retail payment activities. The BoC’s objectives pursuant to the legislation are to (a) supervise payment service providers to determine their compliance with the Retail Payments Activities Act (b) promote the adoption by payment service providers of policies and procedures intended to ensure compliance, and (c) monitor and evaluate developments and issues in the world of retail payment activities.
How the Bank of Canada’s Supervisory Framework is Outlined
The Framework focuses on three activities: (1) registration, (2) risk monitoring, and (3) enforcement. Supervisory expectations will be informed by the Retail Payments Activities Act, its regulations, and additional guidance that is expected to be published by the BoC to help payment services providers understand their obligations.
(1) Registration
Certain individuals or entities will be required to register with the BoC by submitting an application along with a registration fee. Information regarding the BoC’s approach to fees can be found here.
Under the Framework, the criteria for registration are:
- Be a payment service provider;
- Perform a retail payment activity;
- Meet a certain geographic scope; and
- Perform payment functions that are not excluded from the Retail Payments Activities Act and associated regulations.
Under the geographic scope criteria, an individual or entity must either have a place of business in Canada or perform retail payment activities for an end user in Canada and direct retail payment activities at individuals or entities that are in Canada.
Individuals and entities excluded from registration include banks and authorized foreign banks (under the Bank Act), credit unions, insurance companies, trust and loan companies, provincially regulated loan companies, payment service providers agents and mandataries and Payments Canada. Transactions involving automatic teller machines and internal transactions between affiliated entities are also excluded activities under the Retail Payments Activities Act.
The BoC is currently developing a web application allowing payment service providers to register, pay fees, update information, and comply with legislated reporting requirements. Registration decisions will be posted on the BoC website, including those where registration is refused or revoked and the reasons why.
Applicant information of individuals and entities who meet the criteria for registration will be shared with the Department of Finance Canada to conduct a national security review and with Financial Transaction and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC).
Applicants will be responsible for responding to requests for information during the applications process as well as keeping their information up to date. Once registered, payment service providers are required to comply with the Retail Payments Activities Act and pay an annual assessment fee.
(2) Risk Monitoring
Under the Retail Payments Activities Act, payment service providers must establish, implement and maintain an operational risk management and incident response framework. Additionally, payment service providers have an obligation to implement certain measures to safeguard end-user funds, if applicable.
The BoC will monitor and assess registered payment service providers performance of the above noted obligations. To do so, payment service providers will be required to submit annual reports, significant change or new activity reports, and incident reports. The BoC will use these reports, along with responses to requests submitted to payment service providers, to assess a payment service providers compliance. Assessment may include, desk reviews, on-site visits, or a special audit, each being more onerous than the last.
(3) Enforcement
The BoC will use a variety of tools to address non-compliance with the Retail Payments Activities Act. These include:
- A compliance agreement with a payment service provider to rectify non-compliance;
- A notice of violation accompanied with a monetary penalty;
- A notice of violation accompanied with an offer to enter into a compliance agreement (which would cut the monetary penalty in half);
- A compliance order, ordering a payment service provider to stop an action, refrain from taking an action, or to remedy the situation.
The BoC may also apply for a court order requiring a payment service provider to: 1) stop an action that violates the Retail Payments Activities Act, 2) comply with a provision of the Retail Payments Activities Act, or 3) comply with the terms of a compliance order. If a payment service provider disagrees with a notice of refusal of registration, notice of intent to revoke registration, a notice of violation or a notice of default, the payment service provider may appeal the decision to the Governor. If the Governor upholds the decision, a payment service provider may then appeal to the Federal court.
Anticipated Developments
The BoC notes that it may update the supervisor framework before or after the Retail Payments Activities Act comes into force in order to respond to regulations published by the Department of Finance Canada, changes in the retail payments sector, and to respond to lessons learned through the implementation of the Framework. Draft regulations and further guidance are expected to be published by the Department of Finance Canada in 2023.
This update is intended for general information only. If you have questions about the above, please contact the author(s) to discuss your needs for specific legal advice relating to the particular circumstances of your situation.
Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership
Archive
Stephen Penney and Megan Kieley1 The Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Index Investments Inc v Paradise (Town)2 is a significant decision for municipalities. The Court of Appeal endorsed the Newfoundland and…
Read MoreBy Kathleen Leighton & Brittany Trafford The Temporary Foreign Worker Program (“TFWP”) and International Mobility Program (“IMP”) provide Canadian employers the opportunity to hire foreign workers to address their labour needs, particularly when qualified Canadians…
Read MoreThis is the second in a two-part Thought Leadership series on a recent life insurance case out of Alberta, and the implications for life insurers. Michelle Chai and Liz Campbell1 Part I of this two-part series…
Read MoreBy Deanne MacLeod, K.C., Burtley G. Francis, K.C., and David F. Slipp On June 20, 2024 the Fall Economic Statement Implementation Act, 2023 (the “Economic Statement”) received Royal Assent and became law. The Economic Statement…
Read MoreThis is the first in a two-part Thought Leadership series on a recent life insurance case out of Alberta, and the implications for life insurers. By Michelle Chai and Liz Campbell1 The Supreme Court of…
Read MoreThis articles follows our recent Thought Leadership piece on the Federal Government’s announcement of significant investment through the Smart Renewables and Electrification Pathways Program in Nova Scotia clean energy projects. By Dave Randell, Sadira Jan,…
Read MoreBy David Randell, Sadira E. Jan, Daniel Mowat-Rose, and Marina Luro1 Natural Resources Canada has released two important announcements relating to Nova Scotia’s transition to a green economy: Collaboration framework for a sustainable future Canada’s…
Read MoreBy Sheila Mecking and Lauren Sorel The British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal (“BCHRT”) recently dismissed a complaint of discrimination in the workplace, stating that the employer’s investigation, and settlement offer, adequately resolved the complaint.1 The …
Read MoreBy Sarah Dever Letson, CIPP/C, Meaghan McCaw and Bertina Lou[1] Two decisions earlier this month from the Court of Appeal for British Columbia left open the question as to whether so-called “database defendants” can be held…
Read MoreIn conjunction with our upcoming sponsorship of the Halifax Chamber of Commerce luncheon, featuring the Minister of Energy and Natural Resources the Hon. Jonathan Wilkinson, we are pleased to present a Thought Leadership article highlighting…
Read More