2024 New Brunswick election: employer obligations
By John Morse
The New Brunswick provincial election is set to take place on Monday, October 21, 2024, with polling hours between 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.
Under the New Brunswick Elections Act, all employees who are eligible voters (i.e., Canadian citizens aged 18 and older) are entitled to three consecutive hours off work during polling hours to ensure they can cast their vote.
Employers are only required to provide employees time off if the employees’ work schedule does not provide the employee with 3 consecutive hours to vote.
For example, an employee working from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. will have three consecutive hours to vote after work (5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.), and is not entitled to time off to vote. However, an employee working from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. will only have one hour available (7:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.) to vote, and must be provided additional paid time off to provide the employee with at least three consecutive hours to vote.
Employers have the discretion to determine when the three consecutive hours will be granted. Possible options include:
(a) Allowing employees to leave work at 5:00 p.m. to provide three hours (5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.);
(b) Allowing employees to start work later, such as at 1:00pm, enabling them to vote from 10:00 a.m. to 1:00pm; or
(c) Offering three consecutive hours off at any point during the workday while the polls are open.
Employers are prohibited from interfering with an employee’s right to vote. This includes preventing access to the time off for voting, intimidation, or any other form of coercion. Employers are also prohibited from deducting pay or imposing penalties on employees for the time taken off to vote.
This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact the authors, or a member of our Labour & Employment Group.
Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.
Archive
Rick Dunlop In my December 15, 2016 article, Federal Government’s Cannabis Report: What does it mean for employers?, I noted the Report’s1 suggestion that there was a lack of research to reliably determine when individuals are impaired…
Read MoreRick Dunlop and Michelle Black On March 14, 2014, CanMar Contracting Limited (“CanMar”) granted a day off to two of its hard working and longer serving employees so they could spend time with their respective families. That…
Read MoreJoe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The doctrine of unconscionability is an equitable remedy available in exceptional circumstances where a bargain between parties, be it a settlement or a release, may be set aside on the basis that…
Read MoreJonathan Coady After more than five years, the Prince Edward Island Information and Privacy Commissioner (the “Privacy Commissioner”) has completed her review into more than sixty records withheld by a local school board on the…
Read MorePeter McLellan, QC & Richard Jordan Introduction On February 21, 2017 the Nova Scotia Government passed Bill 75 – the Teachers’ Professional Agreement and Classroom Improvement (2017) Act. This Bulletin will provide some background to what is, today,…
Read MoreBruce Grant, QC and Justin Hewitt In the recent decision of Scotia Mortgage Corporation v Furlong1 the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador confirmed that where a law firm acts jointly for the borrower and lender in the placement…
Read MoreThe Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Sabean v Portage La Prairie Mutual Insurance Co, 2017 SCC 7 at the end of January, finally answering an insurance policy question that had divided the lower…
Read MoreIn preparing for the 2017 proxy season, you should be aware of some regulatory changes and institutional investor guidance that may impact disclosure to, and interactions with, your shareholders. This update highlights what is new…
Read MorePerlene Morrison and Hilary Newman During the fall 2016 legislative sitting, the Province of Prince Edward Island passed legislation that results in significant changes to the Planning Act. The amendments received royal assent on December 15, 2016 and…
Read MoreJoe Thorne1 and Justin Hewitt2 In Unifund Assurance Company v Churchill,3 the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal considered the application of our rules of court and the common law as they relate to disclosure of documents produced in…
Read More