2024 New Brunswick election: employer obligations
By John Morse
The New Brunswick provincial election is set to take place on Monday, October 21, 2024, with polling hours between 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.
Under the New Brunswick Elections Act, all employees who are eligible voters (i.e., Canadian citizens aged 18 and older) are entitled to three consecutive hours off work during polling hours to ensure they can cast their vote.
Employers are only required to provide employees time off if the employees’ work schedule does not provide the employee with 3 consecutive hours to vote.
For example, an employee working from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. will have three consecutive hours to vote after work (5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.), and is not entitled to time off to vote. However, an employee working from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. will only have one hour available (7:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.) to vote, and must be provided additional paid time off to provide the employee with at least three consecutive hours to vote.
Employers have the discretion to determine when the three consecutive hours will be granted. Possible options include:
(a) Allowing employees to leave work at 5:00 p.m. to provide three hours (5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.);
(b) Allowing employees to start work later, such as at 1:00pm, enabling them to vote from 10:00 a.m. to 1:00pm; or
(c) Offering three consecutive hours off at any point during the workday while the polls are open.
Employers are prohibited from interfering with an employee’s right to vote. This includes preventing access to the time off for voting, intimidation, or any other form of coercion. Employers are also prohibited from deducting pay or imposing penalties on employees for the time taken off to vote.
This client update is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have any questions about the above, please contact the authors, or a member of our Labour & Employment Group.
Click here to subscribe to Stewart McKelvey Thought Leadership.
Archive
By Brian Tabor, QC and Colin Piercey Bill 81 and Bill 15, receiving Royal Assent in 2013 and 2014 respectively, are due to take effect this month. On June 30, 2017, amendments to the Builders’…
Read MoreNew Brunswick continues to be a thought leader in the field of regulation of recreational cannabis and provides us with a first look at what the provincial regulation of recreational cannabis might look like. New…
Read MoreRick Dunlop and Richard Jordan In Stewart v. Elk Valley Coal Corporation, 2017 SCC 30, a six-judge majority of the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) confirmed a Tribunal decision which concluded that the dismissal of an…
Read MoreBy Kevin Landry New Brunswick’s Working Group on the Legalization of Cannabis released an interim report on June 20, 2017. It is a huge step forward in the legalization process and the first official look at how legalization…
Read MoreRick Dunlop and Kevin Landry As we explained in The Cannabis Act- Getting into the Weeds, the Cannabis Act introduces a regulatory regime for recreational marijuana in Canada. The regime promises to be complex. The details of legalization will be…
Read MoreOn April 1, 2017, the New Brunswick Lobbyists’ Registration Act was proclaimed into force (the “Act”), requiring active professional consultant or in-house lobbyists to register and file returns with the Office of the Integrity Commissioner of New…
Read MoreJoe Thorne and Jessica Habet How far can an insurer dig into the Plaintiff’s history to defend a claim? And how much information is an insurer entitled to have in order to do so? In English v.…
Read MoreNeil Jacobs, QC, Joe Thorne and Meaghan McCaw The Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal recently confirmed that accounting/auditing firms may take on several mandates in respect of companies that may or do become insolvent in Wabush Hotel Limited…
Read MoreJoe Thorne and Brandon Gillespie An independent medical examination (“IME”) is a useful tool for insurers. An IME is an objective assessment of the claimant’s condition for the purpose of evaluating coverage and compensation. Where a…
Read MoreOn June 2, 2017 the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, clarifying the evidence needed to establish mental injury. Neither expert evidence nor a diagnosed psychiatric illness…
Read More